Author Topic: P-47C5  (Read 1534 times)

Offline -ammo-

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5124
P-47C5
« on: September 13, 2013, 12:07:23 PM »
The addition of this AC would fill a small but very significant gap in spring/summer of 1943.  The modeling wouldn't be difficult as it is so similar to the D11, the workload on HTC and the ambitious skin makers would be low. 

The time period this AC served was important and many potential events would benefit from the inclusion of the AC.  I may even get my Bob Johnson skin - "Lucky" :aok

For your consideration.

Respectfully submitted,

Ammo  :salute
Commanding Officer, 56 Fighter Group
Retired USAF - 1988 - 2011

Offline Zacherof

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3992
Re: P-47C5
« Reply #1 on: September 13, 2013, 02:28:03 PM »
The addition of this AC would fill a small but very significant gap in spring/summer of 1943.  The modeling wouldn't be difficult as it is so similar to the D11, the workload on HTC and the ambitious skin makers would be low. 

The time period this AC served was important and many potential events would benefit from the inclusion of the AC.  I may even get my Bob Johnson skin - "Lucky" :aok

For your consideration.

Respectfully submitted,

Ammo  :salute
Only if it has the bubble canopy. THis bird cage non-sense it Bs :old:





























+1 :)
In game name Xacherof
USN Sea Bee
**ELITE**
I am a meat popsicle

Online Devil 505

  • Aces High CM Staff
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8774
Re: P-47C5
« Reply #2 on: September 13, 2013, 02:34:34 PM »
First bubble top was the D-25, Zach.

How does the C-5 differ from the D-11?
Kommando Nowotny

FlyKommando.com

Offline Karnak

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23046
Re: P-47C5
« Reply #3 on: September 13, 2013, 02:51:25 PM »
Only if it has the bubble canopy. THis bird cage non-sense it Bs :old:
Of course it had a bird cage canopy.  Do you think they went from bubble canopy, took the effort to design and build a bird cage canopy for some reason and then went back to a bubble canopy?
Petals floating by,
      Drift through my woman's hand,
             As she remembers me-

Offline Butcher

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5323
Re: P-47C5
« Reply #4 on: September 13, 2013, 03:27:30 PM »
First bubble top was the D-25, Zach.

How does the C-5 differ from the D-11?

One of the biggest differences was the standardization of water injection into the intake manifold to produce more prolonged combat power of 2,300hp at 27,000 ft. A C-5 does 420mph and D-11 was a little faster at 433mph.
Also additional armor production for the pilot, fuel and oxygen system upgrades and the exhaust ducting was improved for reliability and performance.

Paddle-bladed airscrews were fitted as well.

Its really about a marginal performance difference between the two at high alts. (not sure if this is entirely correct its off the top of my head, jug fans let me know if i am right)
« Last Edit: September 13, 2013, 04:25:53 PM by Butcher »
JG 52

Offline skorpx1

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1130
Re: P-47C5
« Reply #5 on: September 13, 2013, 03:46:29 PM »
MOAR P47!!!!



+100000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

Offline Zacherof

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3992
Re: P-47C5
« Reply #6 on: September 13, 2013, 04:36:50 PM »
Of course it had a bird cage canopy.  Do you think they went from bubble canopy, took the effort to design and build a bird cage canopy for some reason and then went back to a bubble canopy?
it was a small joke between me and my CO. I rarely fly the D-11 for the simple fact of the cockpit setup.

And I already she's a great plane.
One of the biggest differences was the standardization of water injection into the intake manifold to produce more prolonged combat power of 2,300hp at 27,000 ft. A C-5 does 420mph and D-11 was a little faster at 433mph.
Also additional armor production for the pilot, fuel and oxygen system upgrades and the exhaust ducting was improved for reliability and performance.

Paddle-bladed airscrews were fitted as well.

Its really about a marginal performance difference between the two at high alts. (not sure if this is entirely correct its off the top of my head, jug fans let me know if i am right)
but it it more maneuverable?
In game name Xacherof
USN Sea Bee
**ELITE**
I am a meat popsicle

Offline Butcher

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5323
Re: P-47C5
« Reply #7 on: September 13, 2013, 04:56:23 PM »
it was a small joke between me and my CO. I rarely fly the D-11 for the simple fact of the cockpit setup.

And I already she's a great plane.  but it it more maneuverable?


Its almost the same performance as each other except for above 20k where the D-11 was 13mph faster.
JG 52

Offline Megalodon

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2272
Re: P-47C5
« Reply #8 on: September 13, 2013, 05:09:28 PM »
The addition of this AC would fill a small but very significant gap in spring/summer of 1943.  The modeling wouldn't be difficult as it is so similar to the D11, the workload on HTC and the ambitious skin makers would be low.  

The time period this AC served was important and many potential events would benefit from the inclusion of the AC.  I may even get my Bob Johnson skin - "Lucky" :aok

For your consideration.

Respectfully submitted,

Ammo  :salute

+1

 "Lucky" was a D-5 you could have that on the D-11.. I think.....but I don't think you'll get it past the filter  ..maybe<G>
I think you mean "Half Pint" a C-2


 :salute
« Last Edit: September 13, 2013, 07:05:08 PM by Megalodon »
Okay..Add 2 Country's at once, Australia and France next plane update Add ...CAC Boomerang and the Dewoitine D.520

Offline skorpx1

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1130
Re: P-47C5
« Reply #9 on: September 13, 2013, 05:09:46 PM »
Its almost the same performance as each other except for above 20k where the D-11 was 13mph faster.

Honestly the only real difference that will matter when it comes to in-game performance is the speed. Turning and diving are close to the same, if not exactly the same.

Offline bangsbox

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1017
Re: P-47C5
« Reply #10 on: September 13, 2013, 05:31:06 PM »
Nope...waste of time.

Offline Plazus

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2868
Re: P-47C5
« Reply #11 on: September 13, 2013, 05:31:28 PM »
How about a Malcolm Hood P47?
Plazus
80th FS "Headhunters"

Axis vs Allies

Offline Butcher

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5323
Re: P-47C5
« Reply #12 on: September 13, 2013, 05:55:04 PM »
How about a Malcolm Hood P47?

I am not a fan of the bird cage, but I would love a P-47D-6 with a malcolm hood given it was an earlier design then the D-25 (ours Is 30 eny right?)

It would be a perk machine D:
JG 52

Offline Tracerfi

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1932
Re: P-47C5
« Reply #13 on: September 13, 2013, 05:58:01 PM »
You cannot beat savages by becoming one.

He who must not be named

Offline bustr

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 12436
Re: P-47C5
« Reply #14 on: September 13, 2013, 06:50:31 PM »
If this is going to happen can the cockpit and gunsight be rendered properly this time?

The Mk8 gunsight did not become standard equipment for P47 until October 1943 with the P47 D20 series. Before that the P51, P47, and as many P40 as possible were modified at the air depots in England with the Barr & Stroud GM MKII like we have in our Hurri and spit16. This was due to the American N-3B was only good for straffing and dropping bombs due to it projected first a 30Mil ring, then upgraded to a 70Mil ring in 1943. It was useless for air to air combat. As seen by the NAVY upgrading to the Mk8 in 1941 as it's standard gunsight.

A 100Mil ring was needed to lead for high speed combat. After the K14 became the standard gunsight, pilots found when they had to use the 70Mil fixed reticle they couldn't hit anything during air to air combat.

The following pictures will speak for themselves. By the way, from what I can tell all 56th FG P47 until the Mk8 then K14 were outfitted with MkII. Also the windscreen area in our razorback is way to big. The armored glass way too tall, wide and rectangular, with the roof way too wide and flat if you look at the first to pictures. The only change was later razorback versions got rid of the vent window. The tiny size did not change in the windscreen with the razorback.

You can see from the first photo that the gunsight was only just to the side of the center bar to clear it. While fitting inside of the armored glass frame. Our D11 gunsight is about 5+- inches to far away from it's ring sight. The first cockpit photo is oriented slightly from the right. At the most the ring sight and the left edge of the Mk8 glass is 1 inch apart. Dead on the glass of the Mk8 will just fit between the windscreen center bar and the right hand frame bar for the armored glass. The ring sight will just touch the left side of the windscreen center bar with it's right side. It should be about as claustrophobic as the forward view on our new C.205.

MkII\Mk8 Round Glass - 76mm diameter 2.99inch
MkIIs Square Glass - 114mm x 114mm 4.48 inch
Iron Ring - 2 1\4 inch diameter



The glass in the Mk8 below is 16mm smaller than 76mm on my 24 inch monitor. The photo is almost to scale.















Note how the "Iron Ring" has been stenciled to the armored glass below.






bustr - POTW 1st Wing


This is like the old joke that voters are harsher to their beer brewer if he has an outage, than their politicians after raising their taxes. Death and taxes are certain but, fun and sex is only now.