Lots of you guy out there are shooters and ex military. Seriously don't you think Kennedy was an easy hit?
Yes, the shot was a gimmee. The question is who took the shot and who was behind the entire thing. Also its not entirely clear exactly where the killing shot came from. But 3 shots from that distance? The rifle and scope, most of all the scope, was a semi-POS, but still the shot was a gimmee. An 88 yard shot with a scoped rifle, even on a slowly moving target, is not difficult.
Ive seen a lot of head shots, its a favorite for gangs dealing with rats, but never one with a rifle/caliber/bullet of that type except when hunting animals. I still think the exploding skull/brain was excessive for a supposed RNFMJ at that velocity. And the single bullet theory smells too.
The thing is there is a way to make things fit no matter which side you take. What is suspicious is the amount of things you have to "make" fit. Like i said Homicide investigations , successful ones, just dont have that many loose ends that allow so many book sales for both sides of the argument.
Oswald was not an overly skilled marksman. Yeah he qualified "sharpshooter" in the USMC but that was only a middle grade. There were three classifications, lowest to highest, rifleman, sharpshooter, and marksman. The real good shots were marksman and even this was after a basic course with an M1 Garand. Oswald later slipped to "rifleman" in later qualifications and there was never ANY evidence found he had any exposure to firearms either before or after his USMC service.
I think Oswald was one of these fools that saw to many James Bond movies and wanted to play super spy which is why he exposed himself to both the CIA and the KGB. The guy was a whack job ; A perfect patsy.
