I don't think any one is talking about FORCING anyone to do anything they don't want. What people are suggesting is making things more advantageous to play a different way. You want to horde, go ahead, but if you try taking bases with a smaller group it is easier. You want to pick above a crowd, go ahead but you get a better score if you fight the horde instead of being part of the horde and picking from above.
Nobody is trying to force any one to do anything, nor take anything away from anyone. Just giving people more options.
no options have been given that will give an advantage over what we have now. and what exactly will the score do for me? will it give me better planes? more rockets? other than take command of a cv, score is meaningless in this game except for those who like to talk about their "skill".
some of the ideas proposed to "fight hordes" are funny as hell. for example the give more perks to fight up and defend the base to "fight the horde".
just some quick things that I see as funny.
-who gets the most perks? the first one to up? what about the second and 3rd who up to defend?
-what if 20 guys up trying to get the extra perks then realize nobody is going to get them? there's gotta be a cap othewise everybody will just get perks for upping.
-in the point above will the first couple of guys who upped then come back to post about how some dweebs are ruining their extra perks?
-will there be calls on country chanel asking people not to up because there's already 5 defending and you will ruin their perks?
-wont the extra perks actually contribute to even less people defending so as not to ruin other people's extra perks?
which will bring you back to people posting threads about how so and so is ruining the game by talking crap to others who up and ruined their "extra" perks.
you guys need to think a bit more about how your "change for the better" may turn into a "change for the worst".
semp