Author Topic: 50's are different in different planes?  (Read 1511 times)

Offline jtdragon

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 262
Re: 50's are different in different planes?
« Reply #30 on: January 15, 2014, 09:06:04 AM »
The M2 MG had different barrels that could be used. Most aircraft 50's used a shorter/lighter barrel that had a higher rate of fire. With the heavy barrel you had slower rate of fire but longer range and hitting power.
JT

Offline HGANCHOR

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 44
Re: 50's are different in different planes?
« Reply #31 on: January 15, 2014, 10:18:52 PM »
Coolaid Drinkers. :banana:  It's different, because HiTech makes it so.  So we have to live with it, or everyone would fly ponies all day.

“The day I saw Mustangs over Berlin, I knew the jig was up.”
- Hermann Goering, German Luftwaffe commander, WWII

Anchor sends
Lifes hard, it's harder if your stupid!

Offline FiLtH

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6448
Re: 50's are different in different planes?
« Reply #32 on: January 16, 2014, 01:43:28 AM »
Its why I dont fly 51s, its my assist plane. When I feel like giving a helping hand, but dont want the credit.

~AoM~

Offline SlapShot

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9121
Re: 50's are different in different planes?
« Reply #33 on: January 16, 2014, 09:56:13 AM »
The M2 MG had different barrels that could be used. Most aircraft 50's used a shorter/lighter barrel that had a higher rate of fire. With the heavy barrel you had slower rate of fire but longer range and hitting power.

The AN/M2 was used in aircraft and they had an optimum cyclic rate of 750-800 rpm.
SlapShot - Blue Knights

Guppy: "The only risk we take is the fight, and since no one really dies, the reward is the fight."