You attempt to insult my flying,
I didn't attempt to do anything other than to tell you the film of you getting a kill on simon, was neither a fight, imo, or worth gloating about...
yet you fail to point out that he was both higher, faster, and broke my 3/9 line twice (in that there were two merges). He could have easily disengaged. In fact, he did disengage temporarily, only to gain separation and turn back into me for the sole purpose of engaging me.
this is not what is shown in the film... you
merged in behind him, him never being 1.5k out in front of you... now, we oldtime dogfighters don't call this a fight... I'd call it an engagement in which you started out on his 6... granted he may have had a little more speed, and a little more alt, but you started on his 6... and never got off his 6 as is shown in the film... did you not shoot him from the 6 position? just because he attempted to turn back into you from 1.5 k out in front, doesn't mean you didn't have the adv of being on his 6 to start with, in other words, you had angles to start with... by being on his 6... what part of that are you missing?
Interesting that you would claim someone who shot down a faster, higher, more maneuverable plane at an altitude where theirs is outperformed displayed poor fighting skills.
again, you started on his 6... lolz...
Also, it is impossible to "merge" behind someone. I think the term you meant to use was "fell in behind him."
don't know what you're talking about here.... merge-To become combined or united... your flight paths were united, you being on the same path as he, but 1.5k behind...
and just to reiterate my point, if you're going to talk smack about fighting someone and killing them, and then post film.. might want to post one where you don't start out on the guys 6.. it kind of voids the ability to gloat about it...