Author Topic: 44-1 Fuel  (Read 1393 times)

Offline Randy1

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4216
44-1 Fuel
« on: May 06, 2014, 05:10:23 PM »
The late war arena should have the 44-1 fuel for the British and American planes that test reports are available.

That is all.

Offline HighTone

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1299
      • Squad Site
Re: 44-1 Fuel
« Reply #1 on: May 06, 2014, 05:49:28 PM »
We already have it, but it's only available on the rearm pad. You just have to park you plane on there and hit alt+f4  :cheers:

LCA Special Events CO     LCA ~Tainan Kokutai~       
www.lcasquadron.org      Thanks for the Oscar HTC

Offline bustr

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 12436
Re: 44-1 Fuel
« Reply #2 on: May 06, 2014, 06:55:12 PM »
Randy,

Do a forum search for 150 octane. Then go back to the performance web site and look up the most recently released data sheets comparing the K4 versus Spit14 on 150oct. Look at the data sheets for P51B\D on 150oct and the K4 data from the XIV comparison. I suspect the game from a playability standpoint would be destabilized.

At 21lb boost and 70-75Hg, even with 150oct being what the XIV and P51D used over the continent from 44 on. Our luft fans would probably leave the game. And forget trying to play in the MA any other way than would be dictated by the P51D weenies, who many of them fly it so they don't have to fight.

D9 1.8 ata
K4 1.8 ata
XIV 21lb
P51D 75Hg

Fighter--SL-- Alt 410mph
D9-----377-- 11,000
K4-----366-- 12,500
XIV----377--   8,500
P51D--398--   2,500

It's obvious why 150oct as a war evolutionary point of view to destroy the enemy. From a game stabilization point of view, we are limited to the octane used at the factory on the first production delivery date of each given model. Or if Hitech perks it. Do you want the P51D perked? We would probably loose players over that.
bustr - POTW 1st Wing


This is like the old joke that voters are harsher to their beer brewer if he has an outage, than their politicians after raising their taxes. Death and taxes are certain but, fun and sex is only now.

Offline Karnak

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23047
Re: 44-1 Fuel
« Reply #3 on: May 06, 2014, 07:56:12 PM »
I want it for my Mossie VI.  Not anything else.  Not even other Mossie VIs, just mine.   :devil

~375mph on the deck in a fighter with four centerline Hispanos sounds fun.
« Last Edit: May 06, 2014, 07:57:53 PM by Karnak »
Petals floating by,
      Drift through my woman's hand,
             As she remembers me-

Offline guncrasher

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 17345
Re: 44-1 Fuel
« Reply #4 on: May 06, 2014, 08:11:18 PM »
is that fuel leaded or unleaded?



semp
you dont want me to ho, dont point your plane at me.

Offline Drane

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 784
Re: 44-1 Fuel
« Reply #5 on: May 07, 2014, 04:59:38 AM »
is that fuel leaded or unleaded?

 :O  leaded of course  :cool:
92 Squadron RAF - Aut pugna aut morere - 'Either fight or die'

Offline moot

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 16333
      • http://www.dasmuppets.com
Re: 44-1 Fuel
« Reply #6 on: May 07, 2014, 07:13:11 AM »
I want it for my Mossie VI.  Not anything else.  Not even other Mossie VIs, just mine.   :devil

~375mph on the deck in a fighter with four centerline Hispanos sounds fun.
Single seater 410 as fielded at squadron strength.
Hello ant
running very fast
I squish you

Offline Randy1

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4216
Re: 44-1 Fuel
« Reply #7 on: May 07, 2014, 07:28:20 AM »
Bustr, I can't argue with your thoughts on tossing the MA into controversy albeit planes like the P38L suffer in AH because of that .  The L's motor was rated at 3200 RPM with its new crankshaft weights on standard fuel and even that is not modeled in.


The first Ls would be delivered to operational bases with the 44-1 fuel already in place so they would be put into service with the higher pressure and 3200 RPM I would think.  I may be wrong on the time line on the L and the 44-1 fuel.  It gets confusing.




Offline Karnak

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23047
Re: 44-1 Fuel
« Reply #8 on: May 07, 2014, 10:08:49 AM »
Single seater 410 as fielded at squadron strength.
Sure.  Mind you, it'd be a free kill for a Mossie or P-38 still.
Petals floating by,
      Drift through my woman's hand,
             As she remembers me-

Offline moot

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 16333
      • http://www.dasmuppets.com
Re: 44-1 Fuel
« Reply #9 on: May 07, 2014, 10:13:15 AM »
Yeah, but at least I/we'd feel like we had a chance.
Hello ant
running very fast
I squish you

Offline Saxman

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9155
Re: 44-1 Fuel
« Reply #10 on: May 07, 2014, 11:09:32 AM »
I wouldn't see a problem with having different fuel types, or even alternate (DOCUMENTED) power settings, IF there was a perk on it.

So a P-51D with the standard fuel type would be free, but taking 150 fuel would add a perk cost to it.
Ron White says you can't fix stupid. I beg to differ. Stupid will usually sort itself out, it's just a matter of making sure you're not close enough to become collateral damage.

Offline moot

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 16333
      • http://www.dasmuppets.com
Re: 44-1 Fuel
« Reply #11 on: May 07, 2014, 11:30:38 AM »
Yeah we had this discussion, and also about perk ordnance.  Is HTC reading this? :)
If the chog is perked, what reasons (an honest question suggested for debate) are there for a 150 octane 51-D not being analogous?
Hello ant
running very fast
I squish you

Offline Karnak

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23047
Re: 44-1 Fuel
« Reply #12 on: May 07, 2014, 12:21:23 PM »
I wouldn't see a problem with having different fuel types, or even alternate (DOCUMENTED) power settings, IF there was a perk on it.

So a P-51D with the standard fuel type would be free, but taking 150 fuel would add a perk cost to it.
I actually would have an issue with it.  It would put hidden landmines in play.  "Am I facing a normal, just very, very good Spit XVI, or am I facing a super Spit XVI? Well, best just assume every Spit XVI is running at +25lbs boost and that every P-51D can't be caught."

The existence of the boosted versions of certain aircraft would significantly affect how all versions of those aircraft were handled in game.

Basically,  the existence of a boosted P-51D creates an advantage for all P-51Ds by making the decision to pursue much more questionable.
Petals floating by,
      Drift through my woman's hand,
             As she remembers me-

Offline Randy1

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4216
Re: 44-1 Fuel
« Reply #13 on: May 07, 2014, 12:44:32 PM »
I can see the problem as Bustr pointed out but the coin does have two sides.  If the 44-1 fuel is not used then neuter or perk those non American-British planes put into service after the use of 44-1 if there is any other than the 262 and 163. Kind of fair play since a major technology has been discounted.

Offline save

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2844
Re: 44-1 Fuel
« Reply #14 on: May 07, 2014, 03:32:37 PM »
From mid -1944 on estimated 85% of all German pilots where noob's.

Should we also model that so 2-weekers only can fly 109g6 and 190a8's, and Allied pilots can fly 150 octane fuel planes with 5-8:1 in numbers ?

I seldom fly anything lower than ENY 15, mostly ENY 20-30, but what would be the point of fighting when the cruise speed of a 150 octane 51D will overtake a Bf109G6 on WEP.
My ammo last for 6 Lancasters, or one Yak3.
"And the Yak 3 ,aka the "flying Yamato"..."
-Caldera