Damn he didn't say it....but he hinted at it....maybe on the next post.
Mouth in the gutter.....Ha your smack talk makes me sleepy.
He seems to have just recently started flying it...I'm used to the lame Typh games(only engaging when he has friends, flying with 5-8k more alt then rest of the furball, generally flying straight lines). Killing higher planes doesn't mean anything, sometimes the higher plane is just being lazy which leads to mistakes or that higher plane has been playing 2 weeks 
All deaths in this game are the ultimate result of a decision made by the pilot who was shot down.
In the end, a pilot who engages a lower aircraft is engaging from an advantage. If that advantage causes or allows the attacking plane to be lazy or otherwise exhibit bad judgement and ADM, then that is a flaw that can be exploited, just as a lack of shooting skills or turnfighting can be exploited.
You seem to be implying that Fulcrum lacks the ability to perform because of what you perceive to be deficiencies in his skillset, yet you criticize and overlook his accomplishments when he takes advantages of others' deficiencies. That is what we call a
double-standard. Well, technically, it's a play on the "No True Scotsman" fallacy, but it looks like Batman beat me to that one.
I've not known Fulcrum as long as many of you, but I can say that he been very up-front and honest in his evaluation of own skillset in my interactions with him. I've not seen him post once that he was better or otherwise more skilled; on the contrary, he consistently speaks highly of most players he encounters, even if he may not necessarily like them. He even told me that you were quite good, despite the two of you not exactly getting along, before any of our interactions or our duel.
I would suggest you evaluate your motives for posting the above, because once you get through the fallacies and double-standard, what's left is what appears to be a personal dislike for him, and not much else.
