Author Topic: P-38J vs P38L Flight Performance in AH  (Read 6918 times)

Offline GScholz

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8910
Re: P-38J vs P38L Flight Performance in AH
« Reply #30 on: November 04, 2014, 04:50:31 PM »
According to Mosq's sustained turn list they're both equal in turn without flaps. With flaps the L turns slightly better, but I guess it's well with the margin of error.
"With the first link, the chain is forged. The first speech censored, the first thought forbidden, the first freedom denied, chains us all irrevocably."

Offline Randy1

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4299
Re: P-38J vs P38L Flight Performance in AH
« Reply #31 on: November 04, 2014, 09:23:20 PM »
My bet is, that no matter how hard you try, the J will still out maneuver the L. In my experience it is like fighting the K4 vs the G14, while the K4 is faster all around, the G14 seems to out maneuver the K4 slightly.

I got $50 on it!


 I think you are right but I am trying to give each theory a go.

Offline Ack-Ack

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 25260
      • FlameWarriors
Re: P-38J vs P38L Flight Performance in AH
« Reply #32 on: November 04, 2014, 11:17:51 PM »
According to Mosq's sustained turn list they're both equal in turn without flaps. With flaps the L turns slightly better, but I guess it's well with the margin of error.

and Mosq's list is correct.

ack-ack
"If Jesus came back as an airplane, he would be a P-38." - WW2 P-38 pilot
Elite Top Aces +1 Mexican Official Squadron Song

Offline Randy1

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4299
Re: P-38J vs P38L Flight Performance in AH
« Reply #33 on: November 05, 2014, 06:02:19 AM »
According to Mosq's sustained turn list they're both equal in turn without flaps. With flaps the L turns slightly better, but I guess it's well with the margin of error.

The sustained turn performance between the J and L was not in question.  It is the ability to move the two planes around in low speed situations that is in question.

It could be the L is modeled correctly and the simulation coding used to mimic stiffer, nonboosted ailerons in the J model may offer a small benefit in slow speed maneuvers.  

Again, I have zero proof of any of this so I have no argument with those that say it is bunk.

Delirum's post quoting a WW2 P-38 pilot having switched from a nonboosted plane to a boosted plane suggest the AH simulation is dead-solid-perfect.  The question then is why would the nonboosted plane seem to fly lighter than the boosted plane?
« Last Edit: November 05, 2014, 06:25:05 AM by Randy1 »

Offline Randy1

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4299
Re: P-38J vs P38L Flight Performance in AH
« Reply #34 on: November 05, 2014, 06:54:08 AM »
Anybody read this document?

DSIR 23/15439
Description:    

Lockheed P38 Lightning aircraft fitted with power boosted ailerons: brief handling trials

Offline FLS

  • AH Training Corps
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 11621
      • Trainer's Website
Re: P-38J vs P38L Flight Performance in AH
« Reply #35 on: November 05, 2014, 11:31:50 AM »
Randy1 "flying lighter" does not describe anything unless you're reducing weight which is not the case here. We experience a visual representation of pitch, roll, yaw, and acceleration. Those can all be measured and compared. What we know is different between the J and L models is the degree the aileron deflection is reduced at high speeds.

Offline Mister Fork

  • AvA Staff Member
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7294
Re: P-38J vs P38L Flight Performance in AH
« Reply #36 on: November 05, 2014, 12:13:18 PM »
What is the weight of both the J and L? Are the essentially the same bird otherwise other than the L is the improved version?
"Games are meant to be fun and fair but fighting a war is neither." - HiTech

Offline FLS

  • AH Training Corps
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 11621
      • Trainer's Website
Re: P-38J vs P38L Flight Performance in AH
« Reply #37 on: November 05, 2014, 12:59:04 PM »
The weights in the hanger are the same when the loads match. The significant differences between the late model J and the L are the dive flaps and aileron boost. The most noticeable performance difference in AH after the high speed roll rate has been the snap roll behavior.

Offline Randy1

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4299
Re: P-38J vs P38L Flight Performance in AH
« Reply #38 on: November 05, 2014, 02:30:53 PM »
Randy1 "flying lighter" does not describe anything unless you're reducing weight which is not the case here. We experience a visual representation of pitch, roll, yaw, and acceleration. Those can all be measured and compared. What we know is different between the J and L models is the degree the aileron deflection is reduced at high speeds.

Flying lighter is just a descriptive phase for the difference in the J model meaning the J model flies as if it were lighter.

Offline FLS

  • AH Training Corps
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 11621
      • Trainer's Website
Re: P-38J vs P38L Flight Performance in AH
« Reply #39 on: November 05, 2014, 03:03:22 PM »
Flying lighter is just a descriptive phase for the difference in the J model meaning the J model flies as if it were lighter.
Aren't you just repeating the phrase?  Actually flying as if it was lighter would be measurable in climb rate and turn rate. The known difference in handling is the roll rate. I assume the roll inertia is the same because the total weight is the same but the difference in snap rolls makes me wonder what causes it.

Offline Randy1

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4299
Re: P-38J vs P38L Flight Performance in AH
« Reply #40 on: November 05, 2014, 03:31:55 PM »
Aren't you just repeating the phrase?  Actually flying as if it was lighter would be measurable in climb rate and turn rate. The known difference in handling is the roll rate. I assume the roll inertia is the same because the total weight is the same but the difference in snap rolls makes me wonder what causes it.

Was the L model the first P-38 with a bit larger fuel tanks?  I think each wing leading edge tank had an addtional 55 gallons

Offline FLS

  • AH Training Corps
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 11621
      • Trainer's Website
Re: P-38J vs P38L Flight Performance in AH
« Reply #41 on: November 05, 2014, 04:00:23 PM »
The late model J's also have the additional wing tanks. Note the weights and fuel capacities are the same.

Offline colmbo

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2246
      • Photos
Re: P-38J vs P38L Flight Performance in AH
« Reply #42 on: November 05, 2014, 06:09:55 PM »
...the difference in snap rolls makes me wonder what causes it.

I haven't been able to see a difference in handling yet.  What is it you're seeing?
Columbo

"When once you have tasted flight, you will forever walk the earth with your eyes turned skyward, for there you have been, and there you will always long to return."

Fate whispers to the warrior "You cannot withstand the storm" and the warrior whispers back "I AM THE STORM"

Offline save

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2873
Re: P-38J vs P38L Flight Performance in AH
« Reply #43 on: November 05, 2014, 06:13:48 PM »
38L follow in to a dive up to about 500-ish, whereas 38j normally pull out earlier.
My ammo last for 6 Lancasters, or one Yak3.
"And the Yak 3 ,aka the "flying Yamato"..."
-Caldera

Offline FLS

  • AH Training Corps
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 11621
      • Trainer's Website
Re: P-38J vs P38L Flight Performance in AH
« Reply #44 on: November 05, 2014, 06:29:49 PM »
I haven't been able to see a difference in handling yet.  What is it you're seeing?

The 38J  seems to start and stop a snap roll more easily. A few years ago I wasn't able to get more than a quarter roll from the L but it's better now. I don't know if the flight model changed or I did something differently but I couldn't get both models to respond the same way . I was surprised when I tried it again and it worked. It's still a puzzle.