Author Topic: food for thought  (Read 309 times)

Offline Meatwad

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 12794
food for thought
« on: July 21, 2015, 12:21:50 PM »
Has anyone ever really looked at the back of food items and read the serving size and the number of servings in the container to see if you are actually getting whats supposed to be in there?

Don't buy laffy taffy in caseys private label peg bags, you get hosed on being shorted candy
See Rule 19- Do not place sausage on pizza.
I am No-Sausage-On-Pizza-Wad.
Das Funkillah - I kill hangers, therefore I am a funkiller. Coming to a vulchfest near you.
You cant tie a loop around 400000 lbs of locomotive using a 2 foot rope - Drediock on fat women

Offline guncrasher

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 17360
Re: food for thought
« Reply #1 on: July 21, 2015, 01:34:51 PM »
I remember when a 12 ounce can of soda used to say 2 servings.  think beer used to mention the same thing.



semp
you dont want me to ho, dont point your plane at me.

Offline zack1234

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 13213
Re: food for thought
« Reply #2 on: July 23, 2015, 12:06:46 AM »
How many servings are required for AH.

And are SECs required to have additional nutritional advice information?
There are no pies stored in this plane overnight

                          
The GFC
Pipz lived in the Wilderness near Ontario

Offline ghi

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2669
Re: food for thought
« Reply #3 on: July 25, 2015, 05:23:38 PM »
I'm not worried  about the size but I want to know what I eat;  they won't allow state GMO labelling?
I'm amazed how this bill was passed silently;  I'm  in Canada but here 95% of fresh produce and lots of other foods frozen, meat...are coming  from US;

"House passes bill to prevent states from requiring mandatory GMO labels on food packages
Published July 23, 2015
Associated Press
Facebook
 
Twitter
 
Email
WASHINGTON –  Food companies would not have to disclose whether their products include genetically modified ingredients under legislation passed by the House Thursday.

The House bill is backed by the food industry, which has fought mandatory labeling efforts in several states around the country. The legislation, which passed 275-150, would prevent states from requiring package labels to indicate the presence of genetically modified organisms, or GMOs
http://www.foxbusiness.com/markets/2015/07/23/house-passes-bill-to-prevent-states-from-requiring-mandatory-gmo-labels-on-food/

"U.S. House moves to block labeling of GM foods"
http://news.sciencemag.org/policy/2015/07/u-s-house-moves-block-labeling-gm-foods

« Last Edit: July 25, 2015, 05:33:12 PM by ghi »

Offline jeep00

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 924
Re: food for thought
« Reply #4 on: July 25, 2015, 05:32:56 PM »
Always compare unit price too. Many times the bulk buy is not the best buy.