He was not a pilot now was he...
I didn't say he was a pilot, now did I?
Also I have little faith in that account. If nothing else that kid should have stayed in school because
"Our lessons in school, apart from a basic curriculum, revolved around aircraft identification (friendly and enemy), scrap collecting, herb collecting, parades and inspections, and messenger and light antiaircraft (AA) duties. . . .
"In 1943 I was ten years old, and at the age of ten we Jungvolk knew how to change the barrel on a 20mm gun. We loaded magazines and ran messages, often under fighter-bomber fire, between gun emplacements or to headquarters (HQ), when telephone communications had been shot to ribbons. A Hitler Youth knew the sound of a P-38 or a Typhoon making a beeline toward him with cannons blazing. He knew where to take cover in the nearest foxhole. He stood steadfast by the light of AA’s, handing magazines to the loader, when around him all hell was breaking loose. It was a total war, where everyone was involved, especially after the Normandy landings—because Germany, from that date, was waging a war on two fronts."
no German would spell it "Gabelschwanz Teufel". Germans make compound words ...
Maybe you don't know this, but in writing books, the author is often not the person who determines how the printed words appear. That is the realm of publishing company staff. Sometimes that staff makes errors, and sometimes they have a way they want to do it, and even an author who doesn't agree with them (right or wrong) loses that difference of opinion. Also, when a book lists a primary author who is not a professional writer in collaboration with a secondary author who is (in this case Don Gregory) it is highly likely that the second author is the one doing all of the actual writing based on things told to him by the primary author. I suspect that Don Gregory is not an expert in German syntax.
So, based on all of that, you dispute that the primary author is a German? Or you believe that Don Gregory inserted falsified information about a picky detail of German aircraft-identification cards on his own, falsely attributing it as the direct statement of the primary author?
Ye, gods, man. I get that German pilots clearly didn't typically call the P-38 a "fork-tailed devil". I said that already. I have read a lot as well (probably 50-100 books on WWII). What is now proven is that:
1. Caidin didn't invent the term "fork-tailed devil" or the story of its origin.
2. The story of its origin is given in a 1943 Life Magazine article.
3. A German flak crewman says that "fork-tailed devil" was used on German ID flak-gunner cards in 1943.
This does *not* say that:
4. It was common for German pilots to call the P-38 the "fork-tailed devil". I AM NOT CLAIMING THAT. 1, 2, AND 3 DO NOT CLAIM THAT. 4 HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH WHETHER OR NOT 1, 2, AND 3 ARE TRUE.