Author Topic: Thoughts regarding "Admiral Kuznetsov" deployment to Syria...  (Read 7443 times)

Offline artik

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1908
      • Blog
Re: Thoughts regarding "Admiral Kuznetsov" deployment to Syria...
« Reply #60 on: November 06, 2016, 01:45:00 PM »
A thing thats pretty stressful to engines and airframes even under normal conditions without having to stress them further with maximum loads. Its not like the Russians need more hard flying on their engines in the first place. Isnt that one of the main reasons for the ski jump?

Actually ski jump is way more gentle on the airframe during the takeoff than catapult. Catapult uses single point to accelerate an aircraft on full load during very short distance of +-100m. Giving up to 4g acceleration.

It is one of the heaviest duty on the airframe especially for tankers. It is actually more stressful than landing.

The ski jump is much more gentle. In fact virtually all land based fighters even with fragile gear like f16 are capable of ski jump. USAF actually tested it as an approach to handle takeoff from damaged airbase.

If you take a look on the simulation I posted before you'll see that the acceleration is quite low.
Artik, 101 "Red" Squadron, Israel

Offline GScholz

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8910
Re: Thoughts regarding "Admiral Kuznetsov" deployment to Syria...
« Reply #61 on: November 06, 2016, 01:57:18 PM »
Rich, it's no more stressful for the engines than a normal take off on a normal runway. I don't understand how you would think otherwise?
"With the first link, the chain is forged. The first speech censored, the first thought forbidden, the first freedom denied, chains us all irrevocably."

Offline artik

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1908
      • Blog
Re: Thoughts regarding "Admiral Kuznetsov" deployment to Syria...
« Reply #62 on: November 07, 2016, 01:46:41 AM »
I looked once again on the data and mig 29k has +-0.73 thrust to weight ratio at Max takeoff weight su 33 has 0.78 in comparison to 0.67 of super hornet.

Indeed according to my simulation with such a T/W ratio it is not problem at all to takeoff from long 180m strip at full takeoff weight having only 25 knots of WOD
Artik, 101 "Red" Squadron, Israel

Offline Serenity

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7313
Re: Thoughts regarding "Admiral Kuznetsov" deployment to Syria...
« Reply #63 on: November 08, 2016, 04:35:41 AM »
25 knots of WOD

Can the Kuz achieve that on a no-wind day?

Offline artik

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1908
      • Blog
Re: Thoughts regarding "Admiral Kuznetsov" deployment to Syria...
« Reply #64 on: November 08, 2016, 06:21:18 AM »
Yes, it can go 29.


Also I noticed that I missed few more parameters

Kuznetsov's takeoff strip is 195 and not 180m

So using SH data for lift/drag ratio I get for mig

21 knots of WOD for positive climb ratio requirement
9 knots of WOD for zero altitude loss requirement

See http://cppcms.com/files/skijump/#results


In reality it should be even lower as lift/drag calculated using single engine failure on takeoff that adds more drag due to assimetry of thrust


Still in hot and humid conditions it would likely need more WOD
« Last Edit: November 08, 2016, 07:08:38 AM by artik »
Artik, 101 "Red" Squadron, Israel

Offline Serenity

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7313
Re: Thoughts regarding "Admiral Kuznetsov" deployment to Syria...
« Reply #65 on: November 09, 2016, 11:56:13 AM »
Yes, it can go 29.

On paper? Or in practice?

Offline GScholz

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8910
Re: Thoughts regarding "Admiral Kuznetsov" deployment to Syria...
« Reply #66 on: November 09, 2016, 12:52:13 PM »
Downhill.
"With the first link, the chain is forged. The first speech censored, the first thought forbidden, the first freedom denied, chains us all irrevocably."

Offline ghi

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2669
Re: Thoughts regarding "Admiral Kuznetsov" deployment to Syria...
« Reply #67 on: November 13, 2016, 01:23:17 PM »
See Rule #14
« Last Edit: November 14, 2016, 10:52:35 AM by Skuzzy »

Offline Zimme83

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3073
Re: Thoughts regarding "Admiral Kuznetsov" deployment to Syria...
« Reply #68 on: November 14, 2016, 10:44:08 AM »
Things are going well, A MiG-29 crashed yesterday while attempting to land on the ship...
''The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge'' - Stephen Hawking

Offline Devil 505

  • Aces High CM Staff
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8993
Kommando Nowotny

FlyKommando.com

Offline ghi

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2669
Re: Thoughts regarding "Admiral Kuznetsov" deployment to Syria...
« Reply #70 on: November 14, 2016, 03:05:59 PM »
Raqqa Syria Offensive  , crazy video uploaded today, YPG misses Islamic State SVBIED with wire-guided ATGM; France Spec Ops save the day using #Javelin .

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H8CNWbqmhDw
« Last Edit: November 14, 2016, 03:09:29 PM by ghi »

Offline artik

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1908
      • Blog
Re: Thoughts regarding "Admiral Kuznetsov" deployment to Syria...
« Reply #71 on: November 16, 2016, 07:40:19 AM »
Interesting what was the reason of the crash...

To be honest it seems like they pushed barely trained pilots to the service. I've read recently that only few month ago MiG-29 pilots were doing training at Nitka ground test facility at Crimea before the got to actual flying. I have strong suspicions, that it was some issues with training or pilots were pushed to harsh conditions too early. I'm not sure that few month from initial training on land based facilities to combat deployment enough ;-)

Finally India flies these migs for much longer period from Vikramaditya and even longer from shores -  also Indian Navy have way more experience with carrier operations than Russia - they do it since 1961...
Artik, 101 "Red" Squadron, Israel

Offline Gman

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3731
Re: Thoughts regarding "Admiral Kuznetsov" deployment to Syria...
« Reply #72 on: November 16, 2016, 11:24:24 AM »
USNI Navy website has reported that the 6 SU33s that were embarked on Kuznetsov are now being used as land based attack aircraft, and no longer on the carrier.  That leaves 3 Mig29ks single seaters, as the 2 seater is the one that crashed.

Offline Ack-Ack

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 25260
      • FlameWarriors
Re: Thoughts regarding "Admiral Kuznetsov" deployment to Syria...
« Reply #73 on: November 16, 2016, 08:04:46 PM »
USNI Navy website has reported that the 6 SU33s that were embarked on Kuznetsov are now being used as land based attack aircraft, and no longer on the carrier.  That leaves 3 Mig29ks single seaters, as the 2 seater is the one that crashed.

As I said in another board, "Admiral Kuznetsov" is is more of an inter-coastal ferry than an aircraft carrier.
"If Jesus came back as an airplane, he would be a P-38." - WW2 P-38 pilot
Elite Top Aces +1 Mexican Official Squadron Song

Offline zack1234

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 13213
Re: Thoughts regarding "Admiral Kuznetsov" deployment to Syria...
« Reply #74 on: November 17, 2016, 11:16:49 AM »
It's the best carrier in the world

The UK has a new carrier but no planes to put onit
There are no pies stored in this plane overnight

                          
The GFC
Pipz lived in the Wilderness near Ontario