He asked for opinions. I gave mine. Just because we have bad examples doesn't mean you should encourage more. Two wrongs don't make a right. We should strive to be better, not use a convenient excuse that doesn't hold water or stand up to scrutiny. That's why I say let's not go backward. Only forward.
In regards to skins already in-game: Sub variants of 109s are a small matter and open to argument. If you know a lot about the nuances of difference versions, there are some skins that could go on 2 different in-game models and a decision has to be made. Same with P-47-D40s. Gotta put them on something, and that's the best fit. No captured markings should be in the game, period.
The problem skins are the nuke toting B-29s, IMO, and the TAIC skins on zeros, the training (non-combat) schemes and squadron hacks. They shouldn't be in the game IMO. I also agree that formation bombers (I'm looking at you B-24s) shouldn't be allowed at all. Nor should the milk running midnight pamphlet dropping B-17.
However, please check the facts before complaining about some variants. There was absolutely no difference between P-51Bs and P-51Cs. 100% identical just different designations for different factory runs. A lot of the "these skins don't belong on this plane" comments get lost because sometimes there's a valid justification for it. Then when there isn't a valid justification it slips through the system (or somebody misrepresents it to get it past the system because they just want their skin in-game). Learning more always helps with understanding a skin and the references related to it.
Once you get the facts right in the first place, you don't need me, Ace. So keep the insults to a minimum if you can. Thanks.
