I thought he accepted my explanation when I described in detail how all internal combustion engines make water.... but, oh well <sigh>.
Its hard to convey a point with little context and that's my bad.
I was actually trying to make the point that "He" had mentioned the "Chemtrail" thing way back around 2016 or so (don't quote me on the year) and I too believed that he took your explanation into consideration, and because I assume he did - I believe that he - or anybody for that matter - is capable of changing their mind if the information can be presented in a manner that makes sense to them. Many -a- people just take what they read or is told to them as gospel.
To honestly change your mind on a subject like the one above you have to take the time, rationalize the subject, analyze and question your belief system and be truthful enough with yourself to arrive at a conclusion. Inexperience, lack of knowledge or whatever you want to call it (not to imply insult) can muddle perception and understanding.
I did have to question the Airline takeover thingy though. . . . . .lol
I have not mentioned chemtrails one time in this thread.
My intention was not to say that you had - rather that it was an instance as described above where "I" believe you at least considered the explanation and I was under the impression that you may have at least found the explanation "somewhat" credible.
The Airline takeover was a goad the rest of it was not intended to be construed that way. I may have come across with too much sarcasm.