WW1 New Years Eve Special Event

[Spikes]

Well Shane thanks for the detailed break down on how much work it is to get the status logs, but you know I wasnt asking you in particular that question. You see the difference is that all the other replies were either pertinent to the question or they actually pointed in the direction for ascertaining the goal of the question. The question was point blank and did not require your typical wise bellybutton comment. That in particular is the reason people in general cannot stand you or even discussing things with you.
nuff said

Pops

What's your deal? He laid out where to find various logs for the lesser known events.

[captain1ma]

Well Shane thanks for the detailed break down on how much work it is to get the status logs, but you know I wasnt asking you in particular that question. You see the difference is that all the other replies were either pertinent to the question or they actually pointed in the direction for ascertaining the goal of the question. The question was point blank and did not require your typical wise bellybutton comment. That in particular is the reason people in general cannot stand you or even discussing things with you.
nuff said

Pops

actually it was a pretty polite response telling where to find information. thanks shane. pops, i think you misinterpret his response and it wasnt necessary or called for. it was non-confrontational, until your overly aggressive response. maybe take a deep breath and read it 2 or 3 or 4 or 5  times first next time.

[perdue3]

Spikes:
Alright we all had a ball last night. Now I really would like to see a statistics sheet on last nights event.

Pops

To be honest, this opening statement is much more hostile than anything Shane said until provoked. I read this statement as aggressive in tone and unnecessarily so. No one is keeping anything rom you.

Glad you had fun.

[pops04]

Everyone on this post. I stand corrected. I guess the way I read Shane's reply just struck me as being somewhat hostile with the statement as to much effort it is to post the results. My bad and I apologize.
Pops

[captain1ma]

Everyone on this post. I stand corrected. I guess the way I read Shane's reply just struck me as being somewhat hostile with the statement as to much effort it is to post the results. My bad and I apologize.
Pops

 

[Shane]

Everyone on this post. I stand corrected. I guess the way I read Shane's reply just struck me as being somewhat hostile with the statement as to much effort it is to post the results. My bad and I apologize.
Pops

    

Let me clarify, when log results are run when we select them, the individual logs collate fast. The summary logs can take 2-3 mins to process the logs and present the results - it might appear to be hanging, but it's processing the log data.  That's what I meant when I said it takes time to process results for display.