Author Topic: F4U-1D vs Spit/N1k ... does the corsair ever stand a chance?  (Read 1480 times)

Offline Tub-o-lard

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 34
F4U-1D vs Spit/N1k ... does the corsair ever stand a chance?
« on: March 16, 2002, 07:49:11 PM »
Hi all, I finally signed up for the free two weeks this weekend, and I have been having a blast! My 250ms ping hasn't been a problem at all, and the Main Arena has been warp free for me because I play when it is night in the US so there are only 100 odd people in there.

I spent a while flying from the carrier today and I noticed that if I was in an F4U and I came accross a plane like a N1K or a Spit, I was dead.

To try and work out why this was so I took the SpitV for a spin, dived into the nearest dogfight and immediately got two kills before we ran out of bad guys ... so can the corsair ever beat these planes? If so, what techniques do you use?

Thanks in Advance!

Offline FulzGold

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 53
F4U-1D vs Spit/N1k ... does the corsair ever stand a chance?
« Reply #1 on: March 16, 2002, 08:57:48 PM »
Try and get ABOVE em use B&Z tatics against these 2 T&B planes
Tho i have seen some that CAN & DO T&B with the Gull wing wonder.Main thing i find in F4U is KEEP THE SPEED FAST.Try and fight in the vertical tho the N1K and spit also climb very well.

Offline SKurj

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3630
F4U-1D vs Spit/N1k ... does the corsair ever stand a chance?
« Reply #2 on: March 16, 2002, 09:13:31 PM »
Keep fast if ya can

If you get slow you are in trouble.  The F4 out rolls both the nik and spit at any speed so use that when u can.

SKurj

Offline Tub-o-lard

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 34
F4U-1D vs Spit/N1k ... does the corsair ever stand a chance?
« Reply #3 on: March 16, 2002, 09:31:38 PM »
Thanks for the answers guys.

What would you consider would be a minimum speed for the F4U? Also, does this mean that you would never turn hard enough to hear the stall buzzer when fighting in the corsair?

If anyone has any films of an F4U beating either of these planes I would love to see them.

Offline Kweassa

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6425
F4U-1D vs Spit/N1k ... does the corsair ever stand a chance?
« Reply #4 on: March 17, 2002, 06:53:56 AM »
I'm not a F4U driver, and never droven F4Us seriously, but maybe my little experience in other fighters such as 190A-5s against N1K2s and Spitfires would suggest some useful tips.

 Now, "Fight when you are faster, and higher than him" is a truth that applies to all fighters, and a bit vague. Clearly you seem to be asking the situations where you are forced to fight them in simular altitudes.

 The problem with the 'bad turner' planes is that no matter how fast you are capable of, the superior turners are always one step.. no, make that three four steps above of you after the merge. Let's say a 190A-5 is at an equal altitude with an enemy Spitfire9. Both approaching at Head-On direction.
 
 The first Head-On merge happens, and two foes pass each other. Look back, and start to reverse directions to engage again. The speed of both planes after they passed each other Head-On might have been equal, the A-5 might even have been faster.. but the problem is when the 190 tries a reversal, it's turn performance is bad so it takes a long time. If you do a Immelmann turn right after the merge, you will notice the Spitfire has also done the same, but has already finished its move and is pointing his guns at you. By this time the 190A-5 has but just finished, or is about to finish his Immelmann.

 Thus, when two planes meet at the same alt, both having simular speeds, the better turn fighter always has advantage. To win comfortably in these situations, the 190A-5 has to have either looooots of speed or the Spit pilot has to be very inexperienced. Thus, in a bad turner, after a HO merge, you have to go easy on the reversal and extend. What does this mean?? For example, read carefully this scenario and imagine the fight within your head:

* A Spitfire9 and 190A-5 meet, both near same speed, simular altitude.
* A head on pass occurs, the Spitfire, after passing the 190A-5, begins to turn.
* 190A-5, seeing this, just plain extends away straight.
* Now, the Spit9 has turned right after the HO merge quickly. With that move, he lost a lot of speed. He has to build up his speed again, and that takes time.
* So, the 190A-5 passes and just goes straight to about 3.0 - 4.0 distance.
* In this safe distance, the 190A-5 does an easy Immelmann.
* Now the distance closes again, 190A-5 finished the Immelmann. 190A-5 is slow. The Spitfire gained some of his speed he lost, but not all of it. Two foes again, are facing each other with some distance, but this time, the Spitfire a little faster than 190A-5, but the 190A-5 higher than the Spitfire.
* The 190A-5 dives shallowly down to the Spitfire. The Spitfire, if he wants to have his guns on the 190A-5, has to point his nose up shallow.
* Now, as the distance closes much, the Spitfire loses speed again. In contrast, the 190A-5 picks up speed.
* Just when a Spitfire is attempting a Head-On shot, the 190A-5 moves away from the Head-On again, and goes vertically up.
* The Spitfire cannot follow the 190A-5.
* Now, the Spit9 has to nose down and try to dive away, and the 190A-5, after going vertically up, will nose down and start chasing the Spitfire. Two planes started at equal terms, one was energy wise, the other spent his energy in vain. This is what people call "energy fighting"


 Think it as sort of a 'joust'. But after each pass you have to trick the opponent into making bit more extreme maneuvers, while you do the least maneuvers. After many passes, the small mistakes some up to a big one. Such as in the scenario of the Spit9 vs 190A-5. Keep note that in that scenario, the 190A-5 gained the critical advantage when the Spitfire, trusting his good turn capability, turned and reversed after the first pass. It took time for the Spitfire to regain some of the energy he lost, and during that time the 190A-5 ran away to a safe distance, and gained an altitude advantage and came back.

 Fighting in a Corsair against supreme turners at the same altitude, unless the Corsair pilot is extremely talented, is always a disadvantaged game for reasons I have stated in the beginning. Make long extensions, pass after pass, and see if the pilot in the turn fighter is a hasty guy, reversing not long after each pass. If he is, he can be shot down with patience and good energy management. If the pilot you see is a cautious one, seemingly experienced, and makes his reversals after passes carefully, then run. He mocks you or not, just run. That is the time when you should run and come back later with higher altitude and speed. :)

Offline cp52

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 60
Great stuff, Kweassa
« Reply #5 on: March 17, 2002, 08:40:26 AM »
I have had this same problem and will try this out.  Thanks!!!:)

Offline Tub-o-lard

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 34
F4U-1D vs Spit/N1k ... does the corsair ever stand a chance?
« Reply #6 on: March 17, 2002, 05:35:33 PM »
Wow, excellent response Kweassa!! I will have to try these out next time I come across one of these planes 1 vs 1

Offline terracota

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 14
      • http://members.fortunecity.com/terracota
F4U-1D vs Spit/N1k ... does the corsair ever stand a chance?
« Reply #7 on: March 18, 2002, 12:00:23 PM »
Kweassa is rigth thats the best thing you can do against those kind of planes, I have about 2 years flying the f4u-1d corsair so I can send ya some films showing exactly what Kweassa said
f4u vrs spits, f4u vrs niks, f4u vrs zeros .


just tell me where can I send it

terra

Hammerhead

  • Guest
F4U-1D vs Spit/N1k ... does the corsair ever stand a chance?
« Reply #8 on: March 18, 2002, 12:03:01 PM »
At Last............
Now I know what they mean by E-fighting....:o :D :D ;)

Offline humble

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6434
F4U-1D vs Spit/N1k ... does the corsair ever stand a chance?
« Reply #9 on: March 18, 2002, 04:38:41 PM »
Tub-o-lard,

couple points I can add here....

1st lets deal with the vertical...the hog is a good E fighter in the vertical. It will zoom well and has excellent rudder authority. As a general rule the hog will equal or outpreform the spit and nikki in the vertical...of course you need the E...if you go vertical in a neg E situation the 20mm in either con will make you pay for your mistake.

In the horizontal, both the nikki and the spit are sluggish at higher speeds, they have a slower roll rate and their turn rate at high speed is actually not very good....so, if you are on the 6 of a nikki or spit try the following...as you close the range throttle back if your closure rate is very high. As the con breaks...pull up and use rudder to start turn toward con (this will bleed some extra E) as you roll semi inverted you can pull down and usually have a nice snap or tracking shot. If the con continues to turn dont follow more than a 1/2 circle...either roll 90 degree's away and extend...or pull to vertical if you feel you have the E to top the con out if he reverses and follows.

To win in the hog you need to win the E fight and then use the vertical to "saddle up"...you'll almost never get a kill vs a true T&B fighter in the horizontal.

"The beauty of the second amendment is that it will not be needed until they try to take it."-Pres. Thomas Jefferson

Offline Tub-o-lard

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 34
F4U-1D vs Spit/N1k ... does the corsair ever stand a chance?
« Reply #10 on: March 18, 2002, 05:57:13 PM »
Humble and terracota thanks for the great replies. I would love to see those films, can you please send them to:

michaelk at access dot com dot au

Thanks in advance!

Offline Widewing

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8800
F4U-1D vs Spit/N1k ... does the corsair ever stand a chance?
« Reply #11 on: March 19, 2002, 11:46:03 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Kweassa
I'm not a F4U driver, and never droven F4Us seriously, but maybe my little experience in other fighters such as 190A-5s against N1K2s and Spitfires would suggest some useful tips.

 Now, "Fight when you are faster, and higher than him" is a truth that applies to all fighters, and a bit vague. Clearly you seem to be asking the situations where you are forced to fight them in simular altitudes.

 The problem with the 'bad turner' planes is that no matter how fast you are capable of, the superior turners are always one step.. no, make that three four steps above of you after the merge. Let's say a 190A-5 is at an equal altitude with an enemy Spitfire9. Both approaching at Head-On direction.
 
 The first Head-On merge happens, and two foes pass each other. Look back, and start to reverse directions to engage again. The speed of both planes after they passed each other Head-On might have been equal, the A-5 might even have been faster.. but the problem is when the 190 tries a reversal, it's turn performance is bad so it takes a long time. If you do a Immelmann turn right after the merge, you will notice the Spitfire has also done the same, but has already finished its move and is pointing his guns at you. By this time the 190A-5 has but just finished, or is about to finish his Immelmann.

 Thus, when two planes meet at the same alt, both having simular speeds, the better turn fighter always has advantage. To win comfortably in these situations, the 190A-5 has to have either looooots of speed or the Spit pilot has to be very inexperienced. Thus, in a bad turner, after a HO merge, you have to go easy on the reversal and extend. What does this mean?? For example, read carefully this scenario and imagine the fight within your head:

* A Spitfire9 and 190A-5 meet, both near same speed, simular altitude.
* A head on pass occurs, the Spitfire, after passing the 190A-5, begins to turn.
* 190A-5, seeing this, just plain extends away straight.
* Now, the Spit9 has turned right after the HO merge quickly. With that move, he lost a lot of speed. He has to build up his speed again, and that takes time.
* So, the 190A-5 passes and just goes straight to about 3.0 - 4.0 distance.
* In this safe distance, the 190A-5 does an easy Immelmann.
* Now the distance closes again, 190A-5 finished the Immelmann. 190A-5 is slow. The Spitfire gained some of his speed he lost, but not all of it. Two foes again, are facing each other with some distance, but this time, the Spitfire a little faster than 190A-5, but the 190A-5 higher than the Spitfire.
* The 190A-5 dives shallowly down to the Spitfire. The Spitfire, if he wants to have his guns on the 190A-5, has to point his nose up shallow.
* Now, as the distance closes much, the Spitfire loses speed again. In contrast, the 190A-5 picks up speed.
* Just when a Spitfire is attempting a Head-On shot, the 190A-5 moves away from the Head-On again, and goes vertically up.
* The Spitfire cannot follow the 190A-5.
* Now, the Spit9 has to nose down and try to dive away, and the 190A-5, after going vertically up, will nose down and start chasing the Spitfire. Two planes started at equal terms, one was energy wise, the other spent his energy in vain. This is what people call "energy fighting"


 Think it as sort of a 'joust'. But after each pass you have to trick the opponent into making bit more extreme maneuvers, while you do the least maneuvers. After many passes, the small mistakes some up to a big one. Such as in the scenario of the Spit9 vs 190A-5. Keep note that in that scenario, the 190A-5 gained the critical advantage when the Spitfire, trusting his good turn capability, turned and reversed after the first pass. It took time for the Spitfire to regain some of the energy he lost, and during that time the 190A-5 ran away to a safe distance, and gained an altitude advantage and came back.

 Fighting in a Corsair against supreme turners at the same altitude, unless the Corsair pilot is extremely talented, is always a disadvantaged game for reasons I have stated in the beginning. Make long extensions, pass after pass, and see if the pilot in the turn fighter is a hasty guy, reversing not long after each pass. If he is, he can be shot down with patience and good energy management. If the pilot you see is a cautious one, seemingly experienced, and makes his reversals after passes carefully, then run. He mocks you or not, just run. That is the time when you should run and come back later with higher altitude and speed. :)


If I may add to what Kweassa has already described (described very well too).

Understanding the strengths and weaknesses of your aircraft, and that of your enemy is essential to success, no matter what you elect to fly. I have been successful in the F4U (37 kills, 7 losses, with only one loss in aerial combat) so far this tour. This is a result of employing the tactics defined by Kweassa and constant practice on deflection shooting. Ultimately, everything boils down to marksmanship. Even if you get perfect position, you must still hit the enemy aircraft with gunfire. In addition, it is far more common not to have the ideal shooting angle, especially when using E tactics. This is because many of your opportunities will come at off-angles closer to head-to-head than near the con's 6, or even 90 degree to your direction of flight. My suggestion is that you also practice off-angle shooting. This can be done offline, and without a doubt will contribute to improved skills and better scores in the main arena. Practice attacking the drones from every conceivable angle. Perfect the judgement for proper lead, and you will become a terror to opposing fighters. There is nothing worse than getting killed from what appeared to be an impossible angle. It leaves your victims shaking their heads in disbelief. Understand that high-angle deflection shooting means NOT using the gunsight. Frequently, you will be shooting without being able to see the enemy aircraft. Likewise, the enemy will not expect you to take, much less actually make this type of shot. A skilled deflection shooter is THE most dangerous opponent you will ever encounter. Guys like Leviathn, Mandoble, Mathman and Nath (naming only a few, there are many others) are expert deflection shooters, and are highly dangerous from ANY angle.

Fly everything. That's right, fly every aircraft to learn its strengths and shortcomings. Indeed, the best way to understand what a Spitfire is capable of is to fly a Spitfire. Likewise for any other type.

I have been flying since the middle of tour 24. I primarily stayed with Spitfires, Hurricanes and the Zero, because I like to turnfight. However, this tour I have added the Fw 190, F4U and Typhoon to my list. This required me to learn energy tactics. Initially, I struggled a bit. But halfway through the tour I have improved to the point where I'm comfortable against any enemy. Last evening I managed 22 kills and one loss flying the Fw 190A-5 (three sorties). That lone loss was credited to an M16 GV, even though I induced an accelerated stall at 100 feet trying to bring my guns to bear. The M16 never even saw me until I fell on him. Included in the victories were Spitfires, N1K2s, and P-38s. Most were killed in huge furballs over airfields. The secret to this success lies in keeping the 190 (or F4U) at or above corner speed at all times (200-300 mph). At these speeds, every pilot's turning ability is restricted by G tolerance. That means that Spitfires and Nikis can't turn any tighter than you without slowing considerably. When they slow down, the advantage remains with the faster aircraft, assuming you don't squander your energy. Should the enemy fighter try a "blackout" turn to get position, you should be beyond range and moving much faster when he eases out of the turn. Simply unload (zero G), extend and reposition yourself for another go at them.

Tactics described by Kweassa are boilerplate. They are very effective as long as you maintain discipline and hone your gunnery skills to a fine edge. Follow the advice given in this thread and I will expect that you will be highly successful in the Corsair (I recommend the F4U-1C, F4U-4, F4U-1 and F4U-1D in order of effectiveness).

My regards,

Widewing
My regards,

Widewing

YGBSM. Retired Member of Aces High Trainer Corps, Past President of the DFC, retired from flying as Tredlite.

Offline Mickey1992

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3362
F4U-1D vs Spit/N1k ... does the corsair ever stand a chance?
« Reply #12 on: March 19, 2002, 12:07:18 PM »
Tub-o-lard,

........um.....nothing really.  I just wanted to start off a post calling someone a Tub-o-lard.  Thanks. :D

Offline Tub-o-lard

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 34
F4U-1D vs Spit/N1k ... does the corsair ever stand a chance?
« Reply #13 on: March 20, 2002, 12:45:22 AM »
Widewing, I understand why you put the -C first, given how much you stress shooting ability, then the -4 second is an obvious choice, but why did you put the F4U-1 ahead of the F4U-1D?

Mickey ... you're welcome :)

Offline Lephturn

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1200
      • http://lephturn.webhop.net
F4U-1D vs Spit/N1k ... does the corsair ever stand a chance?
« Reply #14 on: March 20, 2002, 06:56:12 AM »
How effective you find each plane will also depend on your personal skill set.  Although I am a decent pilot, I'm not a great shot.  It's what keeps me from being one of the really dangerous guys out there.  However, I'm cool with that and I know my strengths and weaknesses.  Given that I'm not a superb shot, but I am a pretty good E fighter, I find the -4 most effective for me.  The C comes a close second for me, but I'd pick the 1D over the -1 as well.  Widewing may rank them differently to suite his own strengths and weaknesses, and you should do the same.

Try them all, and see which one suites you best.  Personally the P-47D is the plane that seems to be perfectly suited to my skill set, so it is the plane I enjoy the most and spend the most time in.