Author Topic: "Aces High: Korea!~" Yes or no? (Read 782 times)

fdiron · « **Reply #30 on:** May 02, 2002, 03:41:01 PM »

By the time HTC finished a Korean War sim, the graphics and gameplay of AH and Korean War sim would be obsolete.

Apar · « **Reply #31 on:** May 02, 2002, 03:50:16 PM »

What Revvin said

Replicant · « **Reply #32 on:** May 02, 2002, 03:55:47 PM »

The Hawker Sea Fury would surely be tempting but I would prefer to see many more WW2 planes in AH before they attempt a new project.

Regards

Rude · « **Reply #33 on:** May 02, 2002, 04:14:02 PM »

Mitsu · « **Reply #34 on:** May 02, 2002, 04:18:39 PM »

no.

If I wanna play Korean War, I will select Target Korea (or MiG Alley

).

-Mitsu

Hristo · « **Reply #35 on:** May 02, 2002, 04:25:09 PM »

Nope, WW2 only pls.

Mathman · « **Reply #36 on:** May 02, 2002, 04:27:22 PM »

Why?

We are doing fine with the WW2 setup and we have LOTS of new planes that can and hopefully will be added.

As others have said, if I want an online sim for Korea, I will go and use Target Korea when it is released.

streakeagle · « **Reply #37 on:** May 02, 2002, 04:38:28 PM »

At some point, after all the planes, ships, tanks, and infantry weapons have been modeled, AH will have little room for improvement other than refining and updating existing models. If and when that point is reached, all that talent will need something to do to keep busy. I would like WWI first over Korea, but I would prefer Vietnam over everything including AH. If there is a plane I love the most, more than the P-51, F4U, B-17, F-86, and F-15, it is most certainly the F-4 Phantom II. Of course Project 1 finally got a publisher. If it is as good as it looks, my time for AH may dwindle even lower than it is now.

Dux · « **Reply #38 on:** May 02, 2002, 04:44:13 PM »

In a perfect world... yes.

In the real world... No. I'd rather see HTC add some cool experimental WW2 planes; that would satisfy my jet cravings.

Quote

At some point, after all the planes, ships, tanks, and infantry weapons have been modeled...

lol, I can imagine Superfly's enthusiasm when he's 83 years old, having to get up in the morning to model the Supermarine Walrus Mk.IV

palef · « **Reply #39 on:** May 02, 2002, 04:47:46 PM »

No thanks.

palef

Buzzbait · « **Reply #40 on:** May 02, 2002, 05:11:29 PM »

S!

No, prefer to see a set of WWI planes and enviroment.

Or better yet, a Spanish Civil War enviroment...

mason22 · « **Reply #41 on:** May 02, 2002, 05:12:28 PM »

umm, does target korea ring a bell?

SpinDoc1 · « **Reply #42 on:** May 02, 2002, 05:16:12 PM »

I agree I'd rather see the WWII planeset finished. Plus, HTC deserves a life... Another point of interest that arises is the need for strat and graphics changes. When I mean graphics, I mean let's have some more interesting maps! Come on, the same three in rotation is getting a little old. I'd like to look forward to new planes AND new maps. Plus, I don't know how the maps are modeled, but is it possible to have some more interesting geographic features, like deep canyons or underpasses (arches)and such. I think different terrain features would interest a lot of people! For strat changes I think industry and performance of that country need to be tied closer together. It would be interesting if a certain factory (ex ball bearing) were hit, and then the 109's at a base would not work. This would be better suited to the CT. I'll put on my firesuit now...begin the flaming.

Jason

Otto · « **Reply #43 on:** May 02, 2002, 05:32:15 PM »

Ok, I've read all the 'nays' on a Korea arena and I've changed my mind.

I'm now in favor of a 1911 arena that explores the first use of aircraft as offensive weapon in Turkish-Italian War.

My heart beats faster at the thought of this.....

-ammo- · « **Reply #44 on:** May 02, 2002, 05:33:12 PM »

Yes! I would love to see that eventually.