Author Topic: WB players trying AH  (Read 1082 times)

Offline Drex

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 627
WB players trying AH
« Reply #45 on: May 09, 2002, 12:44:58 PM »
I have received 17 emails so far, and have sent out replies.  if you have not received my email please let me know.  

Drex

Offline Puck

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2980
WB players trying AH
« Reply #46 on: May 09, 2002, 01:09:22 PM »
Drex, if you wouldn't mind would you film all those training sessions?  If nessisary I'll provide download space for all the .asf files so people can view from any angle.

Of course I might have to close that part of the site while I'm flying.  My connect is bad enough without having my pipe saturated  :)
//c coad  c coad run  run coad run
main (){char _[]={"S~||(iuv{nkx%K9Y$hzhhd\x0c"},__
,___=1;for(__=___>>___;__<((___<<___<<___<<___<<___
)+(___<<___<<___<<___)-___);__+=___)putchar((_[__
])+(__/((___<<___)+___))-((___&

Offline Drex

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 627
WB players trying AH
« Reply #47 on: May 09, 2002, 01:21:20 PM »
I'll have the camera rollin'.


Drex

Offline Edbert

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2220
      • http://www.edbert.net
WB players trying AH
« Reply #48 on: May 09, 2002, 02:30:27 PM »
Quote

__________________
Dnil-or anything with Dni, hehe
Bait for MOL members  


Dnil? Please esplain. Granted I have not been flying much lately but I am on the mailing list, have not seen your name come up on our must-kill chart.

Offline Bcnu

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 81
      • http://www.fourthfightergroup.com
WB players trying AH
« Reply #49 on: May 09, 2002, 03:21:50 PM »
All present and former JG14 types are PUTZES.

:D

Offline popeye

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3658
WB players trying AH
« Reply #50 on: May 09, 2002, 03:33:16 PM »
Edbert,

Stop by, and meet your squadies some time.  ;)

popeye  (another MOL squadie)
KONG

Where is Major Kong?!?

Offline Edbert

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2220
      • http://www.edbert.net
WB players trying AH
« Reply #51 on: May 09, 2002, 04:07:48 PM »
I'll be up this weekend POPI, my new 1800+ will be in tomorrow along with my new Cougar (:)) , son;t ask about the proc...long and sad story. CYA soon ole' pal.

Offline Udie

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3395
WB players trying AH
« Reply #52 on: May 09, 2002, 04:27:21 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Edbert MOL


Dnil? Please esplain. Granted I have not been flying much lately but I am on the mailing list, have not seen your name come up on our must-kill chart.



that would have been like 3+ years ago.  I doubt any of your crew can remember that far back! :D

Offline midnight Target

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15114
WB players trying AH
« Reply #53 on: May 09, 2002, 05:38:18 PM »
I say QUAH! to Warbirds!!!!
:p

Offline Borg

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 48
Aces High vs. WarBirds
« Reply #54 on: May 11, 2002, 11:01:01 PM »
I'm keeping my accounts active in WB, AH, and WW-2onLine to help fund development and competition in all of these sims, but mostly to have fun.
AH has a much more complete strategy in their sim , plus steerable CVs and lots of other ground and water vehicles with user-controlled guns, ranging from 8" to 50-cal. There is definitely some fun and satisfaction in learning how to fire an 8" gun that can destroy other moving ships and bases that are more than 5 miles away.

I have seen some criticism about the AH cockpits because of their non-historical look and layout, but I love their cockpits because all the important instruments are VISIBLE, READABLE, and you can set up your head-position any way you want, to come closer to real-life instrument and outside visibility. This is an all-important feature that makes all of the aircraft in AH more flyable in ACM. WB-2 aircraft had good cockpit intstumentation also, but I consider WB-3 instrument placement and outside visibility to be a step backwards.

I was somewhat annoyed by the AH map clipboard untill I learned how to properly configure and use it. I also love being able to configure keyboard and stick settings while in flight.

Their flight-recorder is an incredible tool for reflying a mission and learning from ones mistakes.

The Aces High kill-buffer does not say who-killed-who, and I miss the humor, elation, humiliation, and competition that this feature promotes in WarBirds. Even though AH player statistics are superior to what WB-3 offers, I really miss being able to call up the statistics of my last sortie in AH

The AH flight-modeling is much closer to real life aircraft that I have flown: very similar to the T-37, which has WW-2 performance, and direct-manual flight controls. The ME-262 reminds me of an underpowered B-737. AH power-off glide and landing characteristics seem much more realistic than WB flight modeling. Neither flight models seem totally accurate because no matter what I try, I can't get any of these aircraft into a prolonged inverted spin.

At this point, I believe that Aces High offers more features, and has more forward momentem and regular improvements than any other online flight-sim.

Offline beet1e

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7848
WB players trying AH
« Reply #55 on: May 12, 2002, 02:31:59 AM »
Borg, I agree 100%.

What real life types have you flown?  I have flown only single engined piston engined types up to 235hp (that one was a C182 RG Skylane). And many would be quick to point out that I'm therefore not qualified to pass judgement on sim flight models. But what I can say is that the AH flight models are much closer to what I would expect than those of the dark side. The first thing I noticed was that AH attempts to model constant speed props; WB is very arcadish in that regard. I've attached an earlier posting about constant speed props. iEN never responded to my suggestion - all very typical :rolleyes:

Offline Esme

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 318
WB players trying AH
« Reply #56 on: May 13, 2002, 02:07:04 AM »
(JG14 -at least in WB)
If they're putzes, then I'm a putz-lover, I'll happily have them keep the foe at bay from my beeyootiful Ju88/G4M/whatever other buff I'm flying. (recalls what happened on the Moresby raid in WB...)

they're good. :-)

Esme

Offline Bcnu

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 81
      • http://www.fourthfightergroup.com
WB players trying AH
« Reply #57 on: May 13, 2002, 10:31:00 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Esme
(JG14 -at least in WB)
If they're putzes, then I'm a putz-lover, I'll happily have them keep the foe at bay from my beeyootiful Ju88/G4M/whatever other buff I'm flying. (recalls what happened on the Moresby raid in WB...)

they're good. :-)

Esme


Never mind, it's an old gag, largely involving guys like Boomer and GJ.

Offline Ripsnort

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 27251
WB players trying AH
« Reply #58 on: May 13, 2002, 11:02:10 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by julle
:D ripsnort the FAF has NOTHING to do with the nazi´s!

Thulin type D (RC-33SW)
Donated by the Swedish count von Rosen, it became the first aircraft  in the Finnish Airforce in 1917.
Nazi plane? ;)

julle http://www.sci.fi/~ambush/faf/faf.html


Julle, read my post again. :)

Offline Esme

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 318
WB players trying AH
« Reply #59 on: May 19, 2002, 08:24:04 AM »
Bcnu, I knew you were joking, even though I didnt know enough to appreciate the joke fully.  I was just expressing a liking for JG14!  JG2, JG14, the Finns, Gums and Samarts outfits, 352nd FG, 341BG, JG26, JG51, 403RCAF in AH - honourable menton to 303 Polish and 401RCAF in WB... putzes, the lot of 'em! But I like 'em anyway! :-)

Esme