Author Topic: Does U.S. Intervention Overseas Breed Terrorism?  (Read 766 times)

Offline wsnpr

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 374
Does U.S. Intervention Overseas Breed Terrorism?
« Reply #15 on: August 07, 2002, 06:17:08 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by GRUNHERZ
I agree! America must withdraw from the world stage... we must not get involved in world politics and must be isolationists. That way we will never have to go to war again...  

BTW

It's all America's fault always! And the WTC was attacked by white-haired buddhist Norwegian grandmothers working for Mossad.


:rolleyes:


MAN! I just knew it had to be them!!! Thanks for showing us the light!     hehe ;)

Offline wsnpr

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 374
Does U.S. Intervention Overseas Breed Terrorism?
« Reply #16 on: August 07, 2002, 06:24:42 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Hortlund


The Koran, Sura 5, verse 85, describes the inevitable enmity between Moslems and non-Moslems:
"Strongest among men in enmity to the Believers wilt thou find the Jews and Pagans."

Sura 9, verse 5, adds:
"Then fight and slay the pagans wherever you find them. And seize them, beleaguer them and lie in wait for them, in every strategem [of war]." Then nations, however mighty, the Koran insists, must be fought "until they embrace Islam."


[9:1] An ultimatum is herein issued from GOD and His messenger to the idol worshipers who enter into a treaty with you.

[9:2] Therefore, roam the earth freely for four months, and know that you cannot escape from GOD, and that GOD humiliates the disbelievers.

[9:3] A proclamation is herein issued from GOD and His messenger to all the people on the great day of pilgrimage, that GOD has disowned the idol worshipers, and so did His messenger. Thus, if you repent, it would be better for you. But if you turn away, then know that you can never escape from GOD. Promise those who disbelieve a painful retribution.

[9:4] If the idol worshipers sign a peace treaty with you, and do not violate it, nor band together with others against you, you shall fulfill your treaty with them until the expiration date. GOD loves the righteous.

[9:5] Once the Sacred Months are past, (and they refuse to make peace) you may kill the idol worshipers when you encounter them, punish them, and resist every move they make. If they repent and observe the Contact Prayers (Salat) and give the obligatory charity (Zakat), you shall let them go. GOD is Forgiver, Most Merciful.

[9:6] If one of the idol worshipers sought safe passage with you, you shall grant him safe passage, so that he can hear the word of GOD, then send him back to his place of security. That is because they are people who do not know.

[9:7] How can the idol worshipers demand any pledge from GOD and from His messenger? Exempted are those who have signed a peace treaty with you at the Sacred Masjid. If they honor and uphold such a treaty, you shall uphold it as well. GOD loves the righteous.

It goes on but I'll stop.

Offline Gunthr

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3043
      • http://www.dot.squat
Does U.S. Intervention Overseas Breed Terrorism?
« Reply #17 on: August 07, 2002, 07:09:00 AM »
Quote
Get a shrecking clue. These people aren't interested in religion - they want territory, influence and power. Religion is a romantic cover story to give strength to their cause and unite a people - which seems to have completely fooled idiotic Westerners like yourself.
- Dowding

I confess, it appears that I've been completely fooled...
"When I speak I put on a mask. When I act, I am forced to take it off."  - Helvetius 18th Century

Offline GRUNHERZ

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 13413
Does U.S. Intervention Overseas Breed Terrorism?
« Reply #18 on: August 07, 2002, 07:15:15 AM »
Phewww! Good thing we have super intelligent western liberal progressives like Dowding here to inform us that indeed the current spate of extremism prevalant in certain Islamic communities has not contributed in any way to the recent  terrorist attacks around the world!

Thanks Dowding!  Now lets get to the real terror culprits those Buddhist Norwegian Grandmothers working for Mossad.  :rolleyes:

Offline miko2d

  • Parolee
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3177
Does U.S. Intervention Overseas Breed Terrorism?
« Reply #19 on: August 07, 2002, 07:41:11 AM »
Not every intervention breeds terrorism. When US went to liberate European democracies against nazi occupation, no one seemed to mind much (except french, maybe).

 When we support Israel, we risk terrorism but that is at least a worthy cause.

 But when we conspire with corrupt medieval monarchs to keep our troops on "holy" land offending majority of population and when we support said monarchy against its people - and against our own principles of democracy - we get deserved hate.

 Some muslims may be more likely to commit violence - that particular religion and customs it supports do facilitate militancy. Nevertheless, it's not the case of them trying to invade and convert us - rather keep us out of their affairs.
 Saving their monarchies from their own people or even from Saddam Husein is not worth our soldiers' lifes.

 miko

Offline Sikboy

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6702
Does U.S. Intervention Overseas Breed Terrorism?
« Reply #20 on: August 07, 2002, 07:59:20 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by miko2d
 But when we conspire with corrupt medieval monarchs to keep our troops on "holy" land offending majority of population and when we support said monarchy against its people - and against our own principles of democracy - we get deserved hate...

.Saving their monarchies from their own people or even from Saddam Husein is not worth our soldiers' lifes.


I'm not sure I follow you Miko. In the 12 years between the Iranian revolution and the Gulf war, I do not believe that there was ever a serious challenge to Emirites. And during this time, there was no US military presense in the region beyond our Bases in Turkey, and the 6th fleet. And there was no public support in the US for the Arab nations. It could easily be argued that cooperation with the United States does not help protect the Monarchies, bur rather, causes them internal problems (some by their own design) which threaten their rule. The only "protection" we seem to grant them is vs. Iraq, not their own citizens.

-Sikboy
You: Blah Blah Blah
Me: Meh, whatever.

Offline Hortlund

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4690
Does U.S. Intervention Overseas Breed Terrorism?
« Reply #21 on: August 07, 2002, 08:18:37 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by miko2d
But when we conspire with corrupt medieval monarchs to keep our troops on "holy" land offending majority of population and when we support said monarchy against its people - and against our own principles of democracy - we get deserved hate.


Deserved hate huh? So how does it feel to hate your own country? Never mind, go smoke a joint and put your head back up your ass.

Offline Dowding (Work)

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 627
Does U.S. Intervention Overseas Breed Terrorism?
« Reply #22 on: August 07, 2002, 08:21:23 AM »
Sorry if my point wasn't made succinctly enough. I'll try again.

Evil acts committed in the name of a religion do not make that same religion inherently evil. Nor does it make all followers of that religion inherently evil. Religious scripture is by definition imprecise and vague and open to a vast amount of interpretation.

Northern Ireland, The Balkans - all contain examples of extremist violence committed by Christian followers, with incitement by religious leaders (particularly in the FY).

Quote
So how does it feel to hate your own country? Never mind, go smoke a joint and put your head back up your ass.


Great comeback, Hortlund. Superb to see an intellectual heavyweight at work!
« Last Edit: August 07, 2002, 08:23:42 AM by Dowding (Work) »

Offline Hortlund

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4690
Does U.S. Intervention Overseas Breed Terrorism?
« Reply #23 on: August 07, 2002, 08:26:15 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Dowding (Work)
Sorry if my point wasn't made succinctly enough. I'll try again.

Evil acts committed in the name of a religion do not make that same religion inherently evil. Nor does it make all followers of that religion inherently evil. Religious scripture is by definition imprecise and vague and open to a vast amount of interpretation.

Northern Ireland, The Balkans - all contain examples of extremist violence committed by Christian followers, with incitement by religious leaders (particularly in the FY).



Great comeback, Hortlund. Superb to see an intellectual heavyweight at work!  


Thanks :)

What about a religion (Islam) that actively encourages its followers to go to war against non believers? Would that be good or bad?

Offline Gunthr

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3043
      • http://www.dot.squat
Does U.S. Intervention Overseas Breed Terrorism?
« Reply #24 on: August 07, 2002, 08:40:27 AM »
Quote
Sorry if my point wasn't made succinctly enough. I'll try again.

Evil acts committed in the name of a religion do not make that same religion inherently evil. Nor does it make all followers of that religion inherently evil. Religious scripture is by definition imprecise and vague and open to a vast amount of interpretation.

Northern Ireland, The Balkans - all contain examples of extremist violence committed by Christian followers, with incitement by religious leaders (particularly in the FY).
- Dowding

I certainly understand that point, Dowding, and I agree.

I simply observe that it seems that most of the terrorism in the world today is committed by muslims quoting from the Koran.

What I havn't observed is a definitive Islamic condemnation of terrorism by Islamic leaders. Am I wrong about this?
"When I speak I put on a mask. When I act, I am forced to take it off."  - Helvetius 18th Century

Offline Eagler

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 18207
Does U.S. Intervention Overseas Breed Terrorism?
« Reply #25 on: August 07, 2002, 08:55:56 AM »
screw em

tired of trying to make everybody happy

lets build bigger bombs & cap their arses
"Masters of the Air" Scenario - JG27


Intel Core i7-13700KF | GIGABYTE Z790 AORUS Elite AX | 64GB G.Skill DDR5 | 16GB GIGABYTE RTX 4070 Ti Super | 850 watt ps | pimax Crystal Light | Warthog stick | TM1600 throttle | VKB Mk.V Rudder

Offline Sikboy

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6702
Does U.S. Intervention Overseas Breed Terrorism?
« Reply #26 on: August 07, 2002, 09:08:37 AM »
I think that we need to be careful when assigning labels to the Muslim faith.  What is the relationship between Islam and Terrorism? In oder to understand this, I think we need to understand the relationship between Islam and Autocratic rule. Why is it that there are so few cases of the Islamic republic? We can look at Iran as one that might happen in the future. Pakistan managed to have free elections until 1999.  But what is the real relationship here.

Islam is based in a region where self rule (in the modern nation state sense) is relatively new.  With the decolonization of colonial terrirories in South Asia and the Middle East, all of a sudden these peoples were supposed to rule themselves. And guess what? Strong men grabbed the reigns of power, and thanks to the fact that they were sitting on all that oil (and in the post WWII world, everyone knew how important this was). So, the west was cool with this. And not just America mind you, everyone was happy with this arrangment. Just so long as they don't get too cozy with the Soviets.

Anyhow, I certainly don't fully understand the relationship between democracy/islam/terrorism, but I'm not ready to say that Islam is any more likely to breed terrorists than any other religion. I believe that there are other factors at play, and that if you swapped out Islam for Judeism or Christianity, you would likely have the same result.

-Sikboy

If anyone is curious about freedom in the middle east (and the world for that matter) check out  http://www.freedomhouse.org/ratings/index.htm ) You might question their motives, but hte data is pretty interesting.
You: Blah Blah Blah
Me: Meh, whatever.

Offline CyranoAH

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2304
Does U.S. Intervention Overseas Breed Terrorism?
« Reply #27 on: August 07, 2002, 10:58:37 AM »
Foreign US Intervention causes terrorism? Hell yeah!

The JFK was anchored at Tarragona harbour, not far from here and I wanted so bad to take a tour, but couldn't (US troops are in a state of high alert or something like that), so now I'm maad, very maad... and I'm going to... going to...

...weep and whiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiine :p

Daniel

PS: Yes, flying over it was forbidden as well :D

Offline AKDejaVu

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5049
      • http://www.dbstaines.com
Does U.S. Intervention Overseas Breed Terrorism?
« Reply #28 on: August 07, 2002, 11:08:42 AM »
Seems some people are hell bent on being commited to a cause... sometimes any cause.  The worse the conditions... the more people of that mentality.

I maintain the belief that if any sovereign intervention serves to stop a war/revolution/feud... terrorism will soon follow.  People were ready to kill before... they'll still be ready to kill.  Its just that they have a new target to focus on.  Hopefully, with time... they'll be able to get back to killing the people they were trying to kill in the first place.

AKDejaVu

Offline miko2d

  • Parolee
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3177
Does U.S. Intervention Overseas Breed Terrorism?
« Reply #29 on: August 07, 2002, 11:52:09 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Sikboy
I'm not sure I follow you Miko. In the 12 years between the Iranian revolution and the Gulf war, I do not believe that there was ever a serious challenge to Emirites. And during this time, there was no US military presense in the region beyond our Bases in Turkey, and the 6th fleet. And there was no public support in the US for the Arab nations. It could easily be argued that cooperation with the United States does not help protect the Monarchies, bur rather, causes them internal problems (some by their own design) which threaten their rule. The only "protection" we seem to grant them is vs. Iraq, not their own citizens.


 OBL was our friend untill past the Iraiqi affair. I am pretty sure he believed that Irak-Kuwait conflict was their internal affair and that we - US - used it as a pretext to place our troops in the region - and keep them there since to supposedly protect Saudi Arabia from the same Iraq.

 If Iraq never posed threat to SA, that makes our stay there even less valid.

 The goal of OBL and his followers was to topple corrupt princes and establish people republic - based on religious principles but kind of democracy nevertheless.
 One of his issues was that the princes exploited the oil that was supposed to belong to teh whole people and sold it for nothing (there were times of $8/barrel where he though good price to be much more) and waste the proceeds on whoring and gambling.
 Our support of the monarchy linked to obvious financial gain due to exploiting resources of subjugated saudi people was one reason he and many others became our enemies.

 The second reason is that continuing presence of infidels (our troops) on their land is considered a sacrilege.

 If we only pulled out 1991 or even never went there, left saudis to their own devices and stopped interfering with their fight for freedom and religious hotspots, he would have likely still been our friend - maybe even as a president of Saudi Arabia.

 OBL did not give rats bellybutton about palestinians and Israel, neither did he have any reasons to like Iraq or accept its help in anything.

Deserved hate huh? So how does it feel to hate your own country? Never mind, go smoke a joint and put your head back up your ass.
 If I hated my own country, I would not have worried much about correcting the wrongs it does or mistakes it's about to make.
 I guess you miss that the hate I referred to was from the people we help opress and exploit - despite our own principles.
 We support dictatorships, we get to suffer hate of their people.

 I bet even in your country there were plenty of people who loved it and still disliked the fact that it served as a base for nazi industry.
 When your own king Charles XII wanted to engage in foreign military adventures, your own parliament actively resisted him, denied funding and happily deposed him after the disasterous campaighn in Ukraine. Where those people traitors or patriots?

 I do not see you volunteering to join the fight in the Middle East, so excuse me if I do not feel the need for us to do so either.

 miko