Author Topic: Max bomb load for SBD-5 is incorrect  (Read 446 times)

Offline Widewing

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8800
Max bomb load for SBD-5 is incorrect
« Reply #15 on: August 26, 2002, 11:25:38 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Vermillion
I forgot that info post on the naval site.  Stupid of me since I have it printed out and in my little library.

Can you imagine a combat radius of 50 nm ?  At sea level you can see 26 nm, from surface to surface.  

Its just a guess, but I would bet that at 50 nm from the deck of a carrier or the superstructure of a battleship you could see literally see the tops of the opposing fleet, not to mention their smoke plumes from the boilers.


These heavy loads where generally used by the Marine Corps SBDs engaged in close support work. Typically, they operated from airfields bulldozed out of the coral, sometimes within sight of the front lines. So, flight endurance was never an issue. SBDs where used effectively for blasting bunkers and caves on several different islands during the island hopping campaigns of 1943-45. Indeed, the Jarheads liked the SBD because nothing else in their inventory could put bombs on target with accuracy even close to that attained by the Dauntless.

Such loads where not used by USN SBDs, because the required takeoff run was too great even for the Essex class CVs, much CVLs and the little CVEs. There is the possibility that overloaded SBDs could be catapulted off.

By the way, escort carriers (CVE, initially built on merchant ship hulls) would be a terrific addition to the game. Flying only Wildcats, SBDs and TBMs, (although the F6F and F4U did fly from CVEs for training purposes) they would be ideal for supplementing the current TGs. I think they would be of great value for TODs, where suicide runs are discouraged by the fact that you have just one life to lose.

My regards,

Widewing
« Last Edit: August 26, 2002, 11:56:04 AM by Widewing »
My regards,

Widewing

YGBSM. Retired Member of Aces High Trainer Corps, Past President of the DFC, retired from flying as Tredlite.

Offline Mathman

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1921
Max bomb load for SBD-5 is incorrect
« Reply #16 on: August 26, 2002, 06:03:08 PM »
SBD's did not operate from the CVE's very often (except in early war).  The reason for this was the fact that the wings did not fold, thus restricting the number of planes that could be carried.  The CVE's used in the PTO during the early war period were mainly used for ferrying aricraft to the combat areas.

I would like to see a CVE or CVL added to the set (maybe add an IJN CVL instead of an Independence class just to keep the country representation nazis from blowing a gasket over another US platform being added to the game).

Offline brady

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7055
      • http://personal.jax.bellsouth.net/jax/t/y/tyr88/JG2main.html
Max bomb load for SBD-5 is incorrect
« Reply #17 on: August 26, 2002, 08:02:43 PM »
Math U reealy do love me:)

Offline whgates3

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1426
Max bomb load for SBD-5 is incorrect
« Reply #18 on: August 26, 2002, 08:09:27 PM »
i dont think a SBD could put all three legs on the groud w/ a tordonut tied to it's belly, otherwise i dont see why not...