Author Topic: SM 79 vs the Cant Z 1007  (Read 6979 times)

Offline straffo

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10029
SM 79 vs the Cant Z 1007
« Reply #30 on: October 03, 2002, 01:30:54 AM »
I want to "wave a little french flag" :)

either with a D520 or with a Yak3 / P63 / P39 / Spit IX

Offline brady

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7055
      • http://personal.jax.bellsouth.net/jax/t/y/tyr88/JG2main.html
SM 79 vs the Cant Z 1007
« Reply #31 on: October 03, 2002, 12:58:05 PM »
D 520 would be nice, very nice.

Offline Imp

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 269
SM 79 vs the Cant Z 1007
« Reply #32 on: October 04, 2002, 06:26:05 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by straffo
I want to "wave a little french flag" :)

either with a D520 or with a Yak3 / P63 / P39 / Spit IX


<---- Drools thinking of a D520 in AH

Un Dewoitine 520 pour AH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! :D

Offline brady

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7055
      • http://personal.jax.bellsouth.net/jax/t/y/tyr88/JG2main.html
SM 79 vs the Cant Z 1007
« Reply #33 on: October 05, 2002, 02:10:24 PM »
WOOO HOOO, My Brand spanking New Hot off the presses Ali D'Italia 18 C.R.D.A. Cant Z 1007 came yesterday. Like all in this series it is a great book, very informative, and filled with a ton of great picks, interiour ones as well showing all the gun positions and and crew positions, detailed drawings of the aircraft and turets as well. It also covers the remakable history of this amasing plane in great detail.

 Some Quotes from this Volume:

p.9  "The cant Z 1007 apears to be the most advanced Italian landplane bomber wrote the Air Staff Office( on 3 Augast 1938)"

p.11 " Magor Giuseppe Colavolpe, commandor of the 1st Flying unit, described the handeling qualities as excellent and satisfactory under every aspect."

 p.11 "On 12th Augast 1939, the Air Staff Office informed Gabaereo that the preformance recorded placed the type very clearly ahead of the SM 79."

 p.11" Since the Cant Z 1007bis has been shown to have better preformance than all other Standard Bomber aircraft currently in service, and in the event that such results be sanctioned by practial experience with service units{they were}, it will presumably be necessary to orient future orders towards this aircraft type."

 p.22 "upon entering service the Cant Z 1007bis immedately showed qualities that endeared it to it's crews- docile handeling, stable platform, good low speed characteristics."

 p.22 " bombs were well placed, making for predictable trajectories that inproved accuracery."

 P.22 "Defensive arament was also found adaquate to keep enemy fighters at bay."

 p.22 " wooden structure extreamly strong"

p.26 " the gradual increase in of the Cant Z 1007bis production rate translated into greater availabaility, which in turn allowed sereral SM 79 units to convert onto the new bomber."

p.35 "1942..."by now the aircraft formed the backbone of the reconnaissance and bomber units."

p.37 " Lt Vittorio Sanseverino, a veteran of the 256th squadrigilia, testifies that the 1007 could take great punishment and was not easily set on fire."

 After the armistice, the Germans and the allies made use of the Cant Z 1007 howeaver the alies seam to of made greater use of the type suporting operations in Italy and in suport of Titos paratisans. In various forms/ and in varing roles the type saw service untill the end of the war on both sides and the last of it's type was finaly withdrawn from service in November 1949.

Offline Kevin14

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 917
SM 79 vs the Cant Z 1007
« Reply #34 on: January 01, 2003, 12:41:49 PM »
I really don't care, just an Italian PLANE

Offline llyr68

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 16
Italian birds
« Reply #35 on: January 01, 2003, 05:47:58 PM »
I'd still vote for the Pe 1008. Production numbers or service use are not a factor in deciding an AC's inclusion in AH....see Ostie and C Hog numbers IRL for two glaring examples.

And, of course a Re 2005 for escort :D

Offline udet

  • Parolee
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2242
      • http://www.angelfire.com/nd/mihaipruna/dogfight.html
SM 79 vs the Cant Z 1007
« Reply #36 on: January 01, 2003, 07:03:51 PM »
who needs crappy italian planes, bring me the Helldiver

Offline brady

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7055
      • http://personal.jax.bellsouth.net/jax/t/y/tyr88/JG2main.html
SM 79 vs the Cant Z 1007
« Reply #37 on: January 02, 2003, 08:56:47 AM »
Hmmm, drives a railroad tie through my udet doll.:)

Offline Kevin14

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 917
SM 79 vs the Cant Z 1007
« Reply #38 on: January 18, 2003, 02:42:35 PM »
Punt?               :D

Offline Jester

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2753
SM 79 vs the Cant Z 1007
« Reply #39 on: January 18, 2003, 06:54:31 PM »
Damn, you would think Brady had stock in the plane the way he is pushing it! :D

Brady!
Lt. JESTER
VF-10 "GRIM REAPERS"

WEBSITE:  www.VF10.org

Offline brady

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7055
      • http://personal.jax.bellsouth.net/jax/t/y/tyr88/JG2main.html
SM 79 vs the Cant Z 1007
« Reply #40 on: January 19, 2003, 06:30:10 AM »
Somewone douge it up and punted it.


     Frankely I have run the emotional gamet of plane hoping to the point whear I am over it, What is that cheasey Doris Day song, been watching Hitchcock movies again, What ever Shal Be , Shal be.

Offline Kevin14

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 917
SM 79 vs the Cant Z 1007
« Reply #41 on: January 19, 2003, 11:13:49 AM »
I would like to see an Italian plane or French.  Everyone is pushing for Me-410s and Ki-84s when Italy has by far the least amount of planes (oh yeah, VVS comes close)

Offline Kevin14

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 917
SM 79 vs the Cant Z 1007
« Reply #42 on: January 22, 2003, 06:04:29 PM »
I don't really want to say punt but..................punt

Offline brady

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7055
      • http://personal.jax.bellsouth.net/jax/t/y/tyr88/JG2main.html
SM 79 vs the Cant Z 1007
« Reply #43 on: January 22, 2003, 06:26:35 PM »
Kevin, plese stop punting this HTC might get pissed and lock it or somthing, just creat a link to it on your sig like i did then people can view it if the wish, I looked up a buch of stuff for this thread I would to be able to refrence it in the future.

Offline DukeMskt

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 47
      • http://www.Accu-Flight.com
SM 79 vs the Cant Z 1007
« Reply #44 on: February 06, 2003, 06:59:57 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by udet
who needs crappy italian planes, bring me the Helldiver

Now THAT'S a crappy plane...Many of my Navy friends flew the Helldiver, and they all hated it. But I dosn't matter, we dont have to work on the "leaker"...As for Italian planes, why not? And the Leaker too...and the ju-52, and the ME410, and and and...I got an Idea! why dont we have a plane building contest for CT? Im guessing HT would be happy to put it in the arena, provided it was up to snuff...what ya think?XXX,Duke