That's kind of harsh to a guy who's been here for only three weeks. Not everybody instantly grasps what we are aiming at here Fancy et. all, I probably would have thought the same in the given situation as Mooja, and so would everyone, if he was here for only three weeks. No need to antagonize a seemingly blumbering answer
, because through such mistakes people learn. Everybody was a blumb once.
....
Mooja, there are few things to consider as a whole:
a) The first and largest objective for a fighter pilot is to shoot the enemy down.
b) but, as a whole, the larger purpose behind shooting the enemy down is to survive. That's why tactics are developed. Pyrhic victories are worthless.
c) Efficient combat tactics are there to help people
win AND survive[/I], not to just win. That is the ultimate premise between all tactical considerations. Therefore, any move that has a good chance to jeopardize your survival cannot be defined as a tactic. It's more of a gung-ho suicidal move. Even with considerable advantage in firepower many good pilots choose not to go for a Head-on, because not only they want victory, but they also want to survive and cherish the victory.
...
Not only the HO tactic you suggest is very inefficient, but it is also dangerous for yourself - because it is so predictable. To say the truth, when I see a bogey chasing either my shallow climb-out or extension when I'm clearly faster, it is almost always noticeable that the guys a "newbie".
Because the faster plane has a lot more than just one "fancy move" up his sleeve, turning the tables on such a wild attempt is what every experienced pilot would instantly recognize as "rope-a-dope".
The faster guy pulls forward, does the "fancy maneuver". You aim up to him. Is that all? What would happen if the enemy goes into a classic double-Immelmann? There are so many ways to so easily counter what you have suggested that the chances are, the HO attempt you described will rarely even achieve mutual knock-outs.
......
My suggestion is this - you should start rethinking this "agenda" you have here:
In a normal, uni-directional shooting plane your main focus should be to always keep the nme in front of you ... *blah blah crap crap* ... I can tell you from experience 9.9 times out of ten if you try to turn around the nme will just shoot you down anyway. So you can see the HO's are your best shot and after that it's pointless to do anything but auger.
What you have stated applies only to planes with equal E-status or very simular characteristics. Also, what you have stated is a classic "1 vs 1", "dog-fighting" scenario familiar to WWI style of air combat.
If I may remind you, that sort of thinking died out in the first year of WWII.
ps) To be more precise, that sort of thinking died out even before WWI ended. There's a good reason Baron von Richtofen was able to achieve 80+ kills and honored as a legend - because his enemies thought like you did, Mooja, and Richtofen thought exactly the opposite.