Author Topic: Air start for heavy bombers?  (Read 571 times)

Offline davidpt40

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1053
Air start for heavy bombers?
« on: November 27, 2002, 06:05:25 PM »
Due to time constraints, how about 15k air starts for heavy bombers at rear fields?  This will not only promote more realistic heavy bombing, but it will also help to encourage some high altitude fighting (escorts vs interceptors).

Offline loser

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1642
Air start for heavy bombers?
« Reply #1 on: November 27, 2002, 06:19:10 PM »
ohhhhh david...one word:   run!

Offline Airscrew

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4808
Air start for heavy bombers?
« Reply #2 on: November 27, 2002, 06:24:11 PM »
This will be fun:D   I got a seat right down in front.

AirScrew

Offline T0J0

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1056
Air start for heavy bombers?
« Reply #3 on: November 27, 2002, 06:35:07 PM »
Incoming!!!!!!

Offline Karnak

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23046
Air start for heavy bombers?
« Reply #4 on: November 27, 2002, 06:36:37 PM »
COVER!!!!!
Petals floating by,
      Drift through my woman's hand,
             As she remembers me-

Offline Kweassa

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6425
Air start for heavy bombers?
« Reply #5 on: November 27, 2002, 06:37:58 PM »
maybe a dud? :D

Offline Thrawn

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6972
Re: Air start for heavy bombers?
« Reply #6 on: November 27, 2002, 06:41:57 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by davidpt40
This will not only promote more realistic heavy bombing, but it will also help to encourage some high altitude fighting (escorts vs interceptors).


It wouldn't be realistic as you would probably see bombers at 40+K.

Offline ALF

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1208
      • http://www.mikethinks.com
Air start for heavy bombers?
« Reply #7 on: November 27, 2002, 06:53:55 PM »
We already have fields at 11k on the much loved pizza map.  Starting with an altitude would be unworkable, for many reasons, just think about different situations where the "magic altitude
 could be abused.

It is true that bombing takes time, but considering that one person can take out small and med fiel FH as it is now, I cant imagin if I could come in at 25k or so with easy...how nasty it would be.

Offline Airscrew

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4808
Air start for heavy bombers?
« Reply #8 on: November 27, 2002, 08:03:17 PM »
About time, Oedipus,  the suspense was killing me.  Good response, not to heavy handed.  Don't want to give the kid a complex do we:)   not unlike yours?;)

AirScrew

Offline brendo

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 269
Air start for heavy bombers?
« Reply #9 on: November 27, 2002, 09:00:45 PM »
I would also like to see this feature.

I am a realism lover. To me this idea has ALWAYS made sense.

US Bombers liked 15000 - 22000 feet IIRC. I think the RAF like 18000.

This would save bomber pilots time.

My 109 intercepter does 4000+ feet per minute climb. I like that sort of challenge.

Its not fair that the bomber pilots have to waste so much time just climbing, only for a CLICK FLY DIE type flyer to nail them at low level.

Offline davidpt40

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1053
Air start for heavy bombers?
« Reply #10 on: November 27, 2002, 09:17:41 PM »
Diversity is the spice of life.  Same applies to Aces High.

The majority of air combat in Aces High occurs at about 5,000 feet.  This altitude favors certain aircraft, and certain styles of fighting.  Now with a heavy bomber airstart of 20,000 feet (from rear bases only of course), a new element would be added to AH-high altitude combat.  

The bomber squadron I was previously in used to do many high altitude raids.  It sure was a pain in the butt to climb for 45-60 minutes in a B17 while maintaining a close formation.  But one of the reasons I was in a squadron was because I was tired of the tedious 5k furballs that are the norm.

Heres my plea:  Give airstarts a chance.  Maybe just for one tour.  Bombers will become more common, high altitude fighting will add a new challenge, and ETO American planes will have their chance to shine.  I know some people may be reluctant to allow air starts because their hunk-of-junk La7s, N1k2s, and other low altitude garbage planes won't fair so well.

Offline Leslie

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2212
Air start for heavy bombers?
« Reply #11 on: November 27, 2002, 09:40:11 PM »
Would be great to have that feature for off-line practice.


Les

Offline Innominate

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2702
Air start for heavy bombers?
« Reply #12 on: November 27, 2002, 09:42:02 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Leslie
Would be great to have that feature for off-line practice.


Les


Get the "germany" map.  it has a 30k airstart.

Offline loser

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1642
Air start for heavy bombers?
« Reply #13 on: November 27, 2002, 10:50:37 PM »
david i think you are really missing something here.

if it werent for hour long climbouts to 18K, i would never wash my dishes, or do my laundry, and i would have this big arsed beard because i would never find time to shave.

HTC secretly extended climbout times so us junkies could do the chores most people do without thinking about it. Just think of Hitech and his crew as your surrogate parents.  

now go check the expirey date on your dairy products while climbing to alt.

Offline Pongo

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6701
Air start for heavy bombers?
« Reply #14 on: November 27, 2002, 11:08:55 PM »
Not a bad idea. Really hard to keep alive in bombers these days