Author Topic: "I've still got a bullet in my leg" - Client  (Read 1828 times)

Offline midnight Target

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15114
"I've still got a bullet in my leg" - Client
« Reply #60 on: December 12, 2002, 03:55:50 PM »
Quote
miko - That does not mean that the discrepancies we see today are mostlythe result of discrimination that ended two generations ago.


Which dream world are you in today?:confused:

Offline StSanta

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2496
"I've still got a bullet in my leg" - Client
« Reply #61 on: December 12, 2002, 04:42:17 PM »
Thought Thrawn was yer old gf lazs :D

Offline lazs2

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 24886
"I've still got a bullet in my leg" - Client
« Reply #62 on: December 13, 2002, 12:49:40 PM »
so that everyone understands... I think that it is a small percentof black people that are causeing the high per capita rate of gun homicides in America.   If we take these sociopaths out of the mix then the U.S. gun homicide rate is "acceptable".  

I do not pretend to know the reasons... I can guess but ... like all the answers i have seen here... it would be a guess...   I am pragmatic in any case... I will deal with it as it is and you libs can work out the "cause"... If you can come up with a solution that is better than my solution then I will support it.

My solution is to have even looser concealed carry permits and at the same time.... Increase penalties dramatically for gun crime including stealing a firearm.   If you ad 30 years to a sentance for burglary if a gun is stolen you will see houses cleaned out with the gun still lying on the floor..  If you dowbt this then you are not looking at the example of the postal service...

In the mean time... If you want to improve the lot of the sociopath in order to prevent more from being made/born whatever... fine.   But you need to get the disease under control first.... a little quarantine is in order.
lazs

Offline miko2d

  • Parolee
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3177
"I've still got a bullet in my leg" - Client
« Reply #63 on: December 13, 2002, 12:54:28 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by midnight Target
Which dream world are you in today?:confused:


 How often do you see whites discriminating against blacks? In my 13 years in NYC I havent' seen one case and I saw a lot of privileges extended for racial reasons.
 And I was looking and asking for years. Being raised in single-race society where racist feelings could not possibly exist other than as concept of "evil" practiced somewhere in US, according to our books, I was really interested. What's more - I saw plenty of evidence from blacks that there is no discrimination, otehr than the danger of resentment brought on by preferential treatment. Ward Connerly? Thomas Sowell? Walter Williams? Any number of books by black authors denouncing affirmative action in your nearest book store?

 How about places where blacks are overwhelming majority, have black school boards, legislatures and mayor? And plenty of money spent per student in a public school, etc. Like Washington, DC, for example. Who opresses them?
 
 I saw the results of the studies - including those that show that blacks with the same IQ are paid a bit more than whites. That does not indicate a lot of discrimination, does it?

 I could try to be personally offencive (like you) and imply that you live in a scary-fantasy world created by socilaists but I would rather argue the issue on a merit of the arguments and data. Care to name real examples of widespread discrimination? I will consider them.

 The liberal's position is that blacks are 12% of the population and women 51% - so we should observe the same distribution everywhere.  That would be true if the groups were identical in related abilities. If they are not - you pose an unachievable goal.

 Yes, the scientists 150 years ago tried to explain an obvious phenomenon with hypothesis that were false - measuring brain volume, etc. Those hypothesis and methods were proven false. That does not mean that the phenomenon does not exosts and that modern methods should not be considered.
 Every time a liberal "refutes" the "intelligence hypothesis", he/she refers to 100-year old statements despite plenty of research done quite recently and available in any bookstore. Why is that? Too scared to tackle the real thing?

 Yes, slavery had negative effects. How come those effects were mild 40 years after slavery but became terrible 100 years after it ended (compare stats for 1905 and 1985 - marriage, etc)? And that after most of the country switched to pro-equality from segregation?

 If the majority of americans support equal rights (after all, the laws were adopted reflecting teh will of the majority), who does all the discrimination?

 Colleges fight for a black student who has even a slight chance not to drop out. Big firms look for such graduates regardless of qualifications to make "quotas". Are you saying there is enough hidden discrimination that negates those widespread and visible efforts by the majority?

 I am not even talking about the fact that even if the discrimination were present, 30 million blacks could have had mostly self-sufficient communities like many other ethnicities had and still have.
 If a guy fails to hire a capable black guy in favor of incapable white or refuses the black customers, than the non-racist business, especially the black business would have built-in advantages of more accessible capable employees and guaranteed loyal customer base - besides the fact that many non-rasist whites would also prefer black-run businesses. So even with real discrimination blacks would actually prosper - like many discriminated minorities did over the centuries in many countries.

 Unless you are implying that blacks are not capable of running the business as well as whites do and cannot maintain a civilised society other that as an appendage of a white one. But that would imply an inherent lack of abilities, wouldn't it?

 How about lots of blacks, let alone other ethnicities immigrating into our country just to get a chance to be discriminated against?

 Anyway, I somehow expect that my post will elicit no more of substantiation than any past discussions did.

 For people trying to prove genetic racial equality of intelligence, liberals surely do not try hard...

 miko

Offline Hortlund

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4690
"I've still got a bullet in my leg" - Client
« Reply #64 on: December 13, 2002, 01:18:29 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Thrawn

Statement - Black people are involved in more per capita homocides then other races.

Conclusion - Genetics in black people are the cause of this problem.


If the statement is true, that does not have to mean that the conclusion is true too. There might be other reasons. Welcome to the scientific method

Offline Thrawn

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6972
"I've still got a bullet in my leg" - Client
« Reply #65 on: December 13, 2002, 01:47:55 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Hortlund
If the statement is true, that does not have to mean that the conclusion is true too. There might be other reasons. Welcome to the scientific method


Uhhh, that's what I said.

Offline Hortlund

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4690
"I've still got a bullet in my leg" - Client
« Reply #66 on: December 13, 2002, 01:52:49 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Thrawn
Uhhh, that's what I said.



Uhhh, I know that.

But if the statement is true, there has to be some reason for it...no?

Offline gofaster

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6622
"I've still got a bullet in my leg" - Client
« Reply #67 on: December 13, 2002, 01:58:53 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Gunthr
I agree, parts of Africa are totally out of control.

  I'm most familure with Zimbabwe. A buddy of mine, Tim Bradshaw, is a close friend of wildlife artist Craig Bone, who lives there. My buddy sells his paintings, and he has spents months there as Bone's guest.

The government actually incites the blacks to take over white ranches and farms by force. You don't go anywhere without being armed. Its a lawless place. Bone has a lot of stories about the stuff that goes on there...

For info on his paintings....



Here


Story broke today in the news that Mugabe was inciting more racial riots in order to steal land from the farmers that bought the land during British rule.  And then there were the Nigerian riots caused by a fashion writer's opinion of the Miss World pageant.  If something like that will touch off a riot, I'm not so sure I'd want to be in an African nation, particularly one that was just coming out of a civil war.

Offline midnight Target

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15114
"I've still got a bullet in my leg" - Client
« Reply #68 on: December 13, 2002, 02:19:21 PM »
I see discrimination fairly regularly miko. Not every day, but often enough.

I have seen the police follow my son around a store then out to his car... followed by the delivery of a ticket for "bald tires".  I am certain that the policeman assumed he and his 2 black friends were "probably troublemakers". This type of thing happens more often than you realize.

Sometimes discrimination is pretty obvious, like that extra ID check at the store counter that the white man in front of you didn't get. Sometimes it is more subtle and probably unintentional like when someone talks to the white man in a group as if it were obvious that he must be in charge. The point is, discrimination is alive and well.

I'm assuming you missed my earlier post regarding the sociological reasons for increased urban crime. I am not trying to duck your intelligence theories, just provide a more logical one. One of the points included this:

 
Quote
[In late 19th Century Philadelphia] blacks consistently outscored their competitors on written tests of all kinds...


Additionally, as a former Special Education teacher, I find IQ assessments to be questionable at best. They are invariably tied in some way to social development or the accumulation of some knowledge base.

I had a student who was tested at an IQ of about 70. If you were to tell her your birthday and year of birth she could calculate your exact age in years months and days in about 3 seconds. She would then tell you which day of the week you were born. What was her real IQ?

Offline Hortlund

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4690
"I've still got a bullet in my leg" - Client
« Reply #69 on: December 13, 2002, 02:23:55 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by midnight Target

I had a student who was tested at an IQ of about 70. If you were to tell her your birthday and year of birth she could calculate your exact age in years months and days in about 3 seconds. She would then tell you which day of the week you were born. What was her real IQ?


"about 70"

By definition her IQ was about 70, you just said so yourself.

Exactly what does the concept of "IQ" mean to you anyway? The ability to calculate high numbers?
« Last Edit: December 13, 2002, 02:31:13 PM by Hortlund »

Offline midnight Target

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15114
"I've still got a bullet in my leg" - Client
« Reply #70 on: December 13, 2002, 02:54:19 PM »
"What IQ means to me"

It is just an attempt to assign a number to a person's potential to learn. The real question is ... how much is intelligence predicated on genetics and how much is based on sociological development?

Offline mietla

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2276
"I've still got a bullet in my leg" - Client
« Reply #71 on: December 13, 2002, 03:01:41 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by midnight Target
"What IQ means to me"

It is just an attempt to assign a number to a person's potential to learn. The real question is ... how much is intelligence predicated on genetics and how much is based on sociological development?


Not an expert here, but as far as I know, you can't change your IQ. You just got what you got, and once  the child develops into an addult and reaches the peak, the IQ remains the same for the rest of a life



I'm sure Miko will explain it better.

Offline midnight Target

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15114
"I've still got a bullet in my leg" - Client
« Reply #72 on: December 13, 2002, 03:25:30 PM »
I'm sure he will also, but that very point is at the heart of the controversy regarding miko's favorite book.. "Bell Curve".

It is not as cut and dried as you say, or as miko feels, or as the authors of Bell Curve try to prove.  

IQ can be enhanced through social intervention.

Offline Hortlund

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4690
"I've still got a bullet in my leg" - Client
« Reply #73 on: December 13, 2002, 03:32:37 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by midnight Target
how much is intelligence predicated on genetics and how much is based on sociological development?


Didnt the twin studies give the answer to that one?

Offline miko2d

  • Parolee
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3177
"I've still got a bullet in my leg" - Client
« Reply #74 on: December 13, 2002, 03:48:51 PM »
Thrawn: Statement - Black people are involved in more per capita homocides then other races.
Conclusion - Genetics in black people are the cause of this problem.


Hortlund: If the statement is true, that does not have to mean that the conclusion is true too. There might be other reasons. Welcome to the scientific method


 Just becasue you call something "conclusion" does not make it a conclusion.

 Here how it really works:

 Statement - Black people are involved in more per capita homocides then other races.
 Hypothesis - Genetics in black people are the cause of this problem.

 Development of the theory:
 Let's come up with a hypothetical mechanism that would explain causal relationship of genetics on a crime rate.
 Let's come with experiments that isolate influence of genetics and support or refute teh hypothesis.

 Working hypothesis:
 1. Intelligence is mostly genetically determined.
 2. Low intelligence increases a chance of antisocial behavior.
 3. Blacks' genes determine lower intelligence.

 Research:
 1. Condict studies on on a statistically significant sample  isolating effect of genes in determining intelligence. Studies on twins, siblings, adopted children. Factor out socioeconomic and educational environment, ethnicity, culture, etc.
 Finding: intelligence it 60%-80% determined by genes. The rest of it is random.

 2. Conduct studies on a statistically significant sample isolating influence of intelligence on anti-social behaviour. Factor our other variables.
 Finding: low intelligence has much higher influence on anti-social behaviour than family income, education, etc.

 3. Conduct measurements of blacks intelligence. Done.
 Conduct studies to determine if the lower intelligence in blacks is mostly genetic rather than economicaly, culturally or otherwise determined.
 Ancillary:
 Determine if the low performance of blacks on paper-and-pencil or oral tests is influenced by lower motivation, unfamilarity with taking tests, etc. Design tests that woudl eliminate such distortions if any.

 Done. Example - Forward digit span blacks are better than whites which indicates better memory and at least the same motivation. Backward digit span which requires much more involved neural processing. The same blacks perform worse. Motivation cannot be a factor.

 Examples:
 Perform culture-neutral question/answer tests designed to measure intelligence.
 Test subjects on neural-pricessing tasks of various complexity not requiring concious thought.
 Measure physiological and neural parameters that were in other groups shown to corellate with measured intelligence - brain wave frequency and patterns, degree of myelination, neural conductivity, neural density, glucose consumption, etc.

 Conduct statistical studies. Example:
Take a sample of parents - whites, blacks, and jews with average IQ 120-125 and family income $100,000+, both parents present and are professionals with a graduate degree, residing in upscale suburban neighbourhoods. All children attending private or suburban schools.

 Measure average intelligence of their children. According to the statistical phenomenot of "reversal to the mean" the average intelligence of the children would be in the middle of an average of their parents intelligence and the average population intelligence. I_children = (I_parents + I_population) / 2 approximately.

 Results:
 Whites average children intelligence 110 which indicates average white population intelligence 100 - as expected.
 Ashkenasi jews children intelligence 118 which ndicates average ashkenazi jews intelligence 115 - check.
 Blacks average children intelligence 105 which indicates average black population intelligence about 85 - check.

 And so on...

 Now we come to a conclusion and can form a theory.

midnight Target: I see discrimination fairly regularly miko. Not every day, but often enough.

 I am sorry to hear that. I would certainly hope that the cases of real discimination are not neglected by honest people. You never do a favor to you own race by discriminating against another one.

 I would like to note that the examples you've cited are not discrimination that would actually prevent a person's promotion or social mobility.
 Yes, police does concentrate more on certain groups. But. Unless the the cops turn criminals and fabricate charges - which does not happen often, most of their checks do not result in any real harm other than frustrationand lost time. I view such attention as privilege to blacks becasue it increases a chance of a black criminal being caught which benefits lifes of law-abiding blacks more than otehr groups. I wouls certainly not mind if police cracked down on russian criminals. I would have easier time dealing with russians knowing there is smaller chance one of them is a crook - even if I have to be stopped by police one in a while.
 My experience with groups which really underwent discrimination - jews and germans in Soviet Union, as well as historical examples indicate that a group is at elast as likely to thrive as suffer die to external pressure - at least culturally, with respect to family values, etc.
 Yes, ID check at the store is humiliating. Not only does not it not prevent one from studying or working, but provides motivation to succeed - provided the ability is there.

 In late 19th Century Philadelphia] blacks consistently outscored their competitors on written tests of all kinds.

 There are plenty of capable people among blacks. Given appropriate leaders and cultural motivation, why shouldn't they have succeeded? Were they truly representative of the whole black race or a selected sample? I suspect latter but I do not know about that.

 as a former Special Education teacher...

 You surely must know that statistics is not applicable to individual cases and a person's individual IQ score is only corellated with his/her chance of success - rather loosely at that. It is indicative of a person's success but only roughly. Often motivation, temperament and other traits play more significant role. I know plenty of brilliant failures.
  But for a population a small statistical difference is hugely significant. Casinos are making millions with only 2-3% odds advantage.

 When it comes to obvious deviaitons from the norm, all statistics goes out the window.
 The girl's abilities demonstrate powerfull capabilities of human mind that are not accessible to us because of higher level of controlling processes. Brain has amasing raw computing ability. She is not in any way unique in that - we all have those abilities, just can't access them conciously or voluntarily.


 miko
« Last Edit: December 13, 2002, 03:51:37 PM by miko2d »