Author Topic: UFO Video, real thing? (really cool ) (Read 1450 times)

airbumba · « **on:** February 02, 2003, 04:59:51 PM »

Here's that url for the UFO vid I was clammering about. I've seen lots of footage, but this takes the cake, if it's real.

http://ufocasebook.com/wtcvideo.html

Let me know what ya's think.

Bumba

AKS\/\/ulfe · « **Reply #1 on:** February 02, 2003, 05:18:23 PM »

Now that... I just have no idea what to say about that.
-SW

GRUNHERZ · « **Reply #2 on:** February 02, 2003, 05:18:41 PM »

That has to be the best UFO fraud ever, really really cool. I bet well see more of them as more talented people get access to digital effects programs.

Great video!

AKS\/\/ulfe · « **Reply #3 on:** February 02, 2003, 05:23:52 PM »

For a fraudulant video, the audio is in sync with everything that happens. (Turn up your audio, just as the object blasts by you hear the lady gasp)
-SW

NUKE · « **Reply #4 on:** February 02, 2003, 05:30:00 PM »

lol! totaly stupid.

1st, girl says "are you getting all this? " as if filming a girl filming the WTC is a big deal.

2nd, girl says" what is that?" a few seconds b4 the "UFO" appears in view.

3rd, the video ends upbruptly................ why? Why no "rolling film" discussion about what they "saw"

Total set up and fake.

LOL.

Very amature IMO.

GRUNHERZ · « **Reply #5 on:** February 02, 2003, 05:30:51 PM »

Yep, Ive watched it several times - it is very good! Very talented filmmaker at work no doubt. Has that professional movie feel.

NUKE · « **Reply #6 on:** February 02, 2003, 05:33:52 PM »

remeber that "Alien" autospy show? LOL, I knew that was a fake within 30 seconds due to camera bouncing around like crazy.

You'd think that if the USAAF was going to document an event that big, they would have had 10 cameras perfectly fixed to see everything.

I like a good hoax, but some people are so dumb.

NUKE · « **Reply #7 on:** February 02, 2003, 05:37:12 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by GRUNHERZ
Yep, Ive watched it several times - it is very good! Very talented filmmaker at work no doubt. Has that professional movie feel.

maybe a talented effects guy, but no film maker. Gotta look at pretext. What pretext would a girl be in a helecopter with a chitty camera, being filmed by a guy with a better camera and asking a the "cameraman" if he was "getting all this" ( getting all what?) when in fact he was only filming her looking at the wtc.

Then girls asked "what's that?" about 3 seconds before the "UFO" stutters into view.

Then she says "it's over there" the instant the light-speed UFO appears where she is looking.

She wasn't even pointing her camera at the WTC.

Funny.

AKS\/\/ulfe · « **Reply #8 on:** February 02, 2003, 05:39:59 PM »

Nuke- it's filming a girl taking a picture of the WTC in a helicopter ride.

I think if you pay attention, you may find most people who take rides, tours or other tourist attraction type deals, they bring along cameras of all sorts to document their adventure.

So, I fail to see how this makes it less real.

Second, she says "what is that" when it is in view, but the camera is not zoomed in all the way... however, as the camera is zooming in, the object is clearly visible (a lot of it) by the side of the WTC.

Answer to 3rd question: To save bandwidth, seeing as how this is a 3rd party website, I highly suspect they didn't want to show a couple of people who also don't know what's going on.
-SW

GRUNHERZ · « **Reply #9 on:** February 02, 2003, 05:40:48 PM »

I saw the whole thing as a short movie about a UFO sighting, it's very good work and the plot is entirely plausible. Some girl and her boyfriend go for a trip to NY and take a helicopter rider around manhattan. He's filiming the trip and their experience and she has a her still camera. In fact I dont think it's all that unlikely that they took the ride on puropse to make the film just for kicks.

Very cool stuff!

NUKE · « **Reply #10 on:** February 02, 2003, 05:41:57 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by AKS\/\/ulfe
Nuke- it's filming a girl taking a picture of the WTC in a helicopter ride.

I think if you pay attention, you may find most people who take rides, tours or other tourist attraction type deals, they bring along cameras of all sorts to document their adventure.

So, I fail to see how this makes it less real.

Second, she says "what is that" when it is in view, but the camera is not zoomed in all the way... however, as the camera is zooming in, the object is clearly visible (a lot of it) by the side of the WTC.

Answer to 3rd question: To save bandwidth, seeing as how this is a 3rd party website, I highly suspect they didn't want to show a couple of people who also don't know what's going on.
-SW

fake all the way

AKS\/\/ulfe · « **Reply #11 on:** February 02, 2003, 05:45:06 PM »

Well, if you say so... of course I'd save my definite answer until someone who can actually analyze video goes over it and determines it's authenticity.

A couple of guys watching a low quality replay aren't really definitive confirmation of video authenticity.
-SW

NUKE · « **Reply #12 on:** February 02, 2003, 05:48:09 PM »

LOL, look at when she says "its over there" . She must have super human vision and reflexes in order to follow that UFO

100% unbelievable imo

AKS\/\/ulfe · « **Reply #13 on:** February 02, 2003, 05:51:38 PM »

You can't be serious on offering that up as proof Nuke. Watching the normal speed replay, I can clearly see the object begin moving right. Then by the time she says "look over there", it's already there and didn't move more than a couple thousand yards.

The object didn't move at lightspeed, a good hundred miles per hour, sure... but it was no where near instantaneous.
-SW

NUKE · « **Reply #14 on:** February 02, 2003, 05:53:06 PM »

not to mention the cameraman's super super super sense on timing in following the UF up after it buzzed them.....I'm so sure.

That cameraman better have had a lazer lock on the UFO in order to follow it up after it buzzed them

Some people have little common sense.

I'm glad Im fairly intelligent...........