Originally posted by Löwe
LOL Shane "Touche"!
As for the A6M2 vs the F4F. The F4F will best the A6m2 in speed, and turns so well your head will spin. The effective cannon rounds on the A6M2 are very low, plus you have to get close to make them count. While your cutting the distance another F4F will saddle up, and blow you away with its 50 cals, that can reach out and wreck our day. Give the A6M2 a dirty look and it catches fire. Add to the fact the F4F has a very liberal damage model, and it's a long week of flying A6M2's. A6m2s vs P-40Bs, and Hurri I's is bad enough. The a6m2 vs P-40Es, and F4Fs is B.S. in my opinon, then again it's my opinon. Not yours:)
Ah, If I want to kill Wildcats, I take the A6M2. It will dominate the F4F-4 in low-speed turnfights. Moreover, the F4F-4 is SLOWER than the A6M2 at all altitudes above 5k. Not only that, but the F4F-4 is a very slow climber.
As to the damage model, Grumman built the Wildcat like a brick toejamhouse. It weighs nearly twice that of the Zero, and is a smaller fighter. It could suck up hits that would kill 5 Zeros. Japanese pilots were in awe of the Wildcat's ability to shrug off gunfire.
I have no doubts that the A6M2 will hold its own with the Wildcat. On the other hand, the P-40E, if flown to its strengths, is almost untouchable by the Zero.
I think that there will be plenty of people willing to fly Japanese.
My regards,
Widewing