« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 ... 8   Go Down

Author Topic: Iraqi losses ?  (Read 2299 times)

Offline llyr69

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 77
????
« Reply #30 on: March 21, 2003, 10:37:53 AM »
You miss the point-no one would have to die if Saddam wasn't a psychotic homicidal maniac.

I find it rather odd that any Iraqi who's managed to get the hell out of there in the last 35 years supports our actions-and the Westerners (who's greatest death threat occurs when they drive on the highway) are making apologies for him!
Logged

Offline Hristo

  • Parolee
  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1150
Iraqi losses ?
« Reply #31 on: March 21, 2003, 10:41:31 AM »
US rhetorics as of recent.

Hey, look, Iraq is our mortal enemy ! Damn, how we missed that for years ? We must attack before it destroys us !

Hey, Iraq is supporting OBL ! But wasn't OBL an enemy of Saddam ?! Yea, maybe, but we'll attack anyway. They are all Arabs, afterall !

Hey, Iraq is dangerous for having WMD ! What do you mean you say can't find it ? No problem, we'll attack anyway !

Listen, we'll atack Iraq if Saddam doesn't leave his country in 48 hours ! But, you know, even if he does, we will attack anyway.

Hmm, we need an UN resolution to start an attack. No problem though, even if we don't get it, we'll atack anyway.

Hey, terrorists might blow up Arizona nuclear power plant. Hurry, we must get Saddam quick, time is running out !

If it wasn't sad, it might even be funny.
Logged

Offline AKS\/\/ulfe

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4287
Iraqi losses ?
« Reply #32 on: March 21, 2003, 10:51:08 AM »
If that wasn't a blatant misrepresentation of the facts to support your weak opinion, it would be sad Hristo... instead, it's just funny.
-SW
Logged

Offline milnko

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 995
      • http://www.cameltoe.org
Iraqi losses ?
« Reply #33 on: March 21, 2003, 10:56:01 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by AronL
One life lost is one to many :(

Does not matter what country the person happened to be born in.
One death is a tragedy, 74,319 is a statistic.
Logged

Offline Hristo

  • Parolee
  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1150
Iraqi losses ?
« Reply #34 on: March 21, 2003, 11:13:16 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by AKS\/\/ulfe
If that wasn't a blatant misrepresentation of the facts to support your weak opinion, it would be sad Hristo... instead, it's just funny.
-SW


Blatant misrepresentation ? Another long word ?

I thought these were facts.
Logged

Offline AKS\/\/ulfe

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4287
Iraqi losses ?
« Reply #35 on: March 21, 2003, 11:19:12 AM »
Some are facts, some are hearsay, they are ALL used out of context or with little understanding of what has transpired here in the US over the past year and a half.

Hint about that nuclear power plant: The government told us a year ago all nuclear power plants are targets, so are chemical and industrial plants. It's nothing new that nuclear power plants are a suspected prime target, yet you associated it with Saddam for some unknown reason. Hence it is a misrepresentation.

I can take a part of a fact and use it in any context I want, it then becomes a false misrepresentation of facts to support my poorly informed opinion.
-SW
Logged

Offline Hristo

  • Parolee
  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1150
Iraqi losses ?
« Reply #36 on: March 21, 2003, 11:37:38 AM »
Heresay ? Misinterpreted ? There war sure has started ?  An aggressive one, without UN approval.

The cowboy fulfilled his threats, without providing one important thing. A reason.

about the power plant
http://www.hitechcreations.com/forums/showthread.php?s=&threadid=82303

You can continue to read Rip's idiotic threads of liberated Iraqis screaming of joy. Next thing you'll see reports of Iraqis begging marines to be killed by Amerikan bullets.
Logged

Offline AKS\/\/ulfe

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4287
Iraqi losses ?
« Reply #37 on: March 21, 2003, 11:45:12 AM »
I saw the power plant deal, obviously you chose to ignore my statement which is FAR more informed than you will ever be.

You get to sit out there on the sidelines, you only get the BIGGEST headlines. I get all the small details, like school districts being prepared for chemical weapons attacks. See that right there, if you had known about that, you would of thrown that up there in your list.

"Children in schools have to be prepared for bio/chem/nuclear attacks... Must attack Iraq!"

When the two are entirely unrelated.

An aggressive war, you uninformed people sure do like to throw that around. We don't need the UN's approval. Iraq's continued non-compliance with past resolutions makes this war completely legit.

As for the rest, you ever heard the term "rock bottom, still digging"?

You are already uninformed and spouting your own rhetoric that you have put together from various headline clippings which in many cases bear absolutely no connection to one another other than what you have invented, why don't you just quit digging?
-SW
Logged

Offline Toad

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 18415
Iraqi losses ?
« Reply #38 on: March 21, 2003, 01:41:11 PM »
Hristo, would you be in support of this war if there had been another UN SC resolution beyond 1441 authorizing the US to take action?

Only need a simple yes or no, not a dodge. Thx.
Logged
If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude than the animated contest of freedom, go from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains sit lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen!

Offline Saurdaukar

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8610
      • Army of Muppets
Iraqi losses ?
« Reply #39 on: March 21, 2003, 01:55:44 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Toad
Hristo, would you be in support of this war if there had been another UN SC resolution beyond 1441 authorizing the US to take action?

Only need a simple yes or no, not a dodge. Thx.


Shall I get the cross and nails ready?
Logged

Offline illo

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 374
Iraqi losses ?
« Reply #40 on: March 21, 2003, 02:11:17 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Eagler
who cares ...


sick. :(
Logged

Offline Turdboy

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 155
Iraqi losses ?
« Reply #41 on: March 21, 2003, 02:23:24 PM »
Hristo I would rather listen to Rip's facts that he can back up than your BS that is incomplete and full of Anti-Bush remarks.

Bush has made his case for War. I don't believe everything he says but on the main reasons for going to Iraq I agree.
Logged

Offline john9001

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9453
iraqi losses?
« Reply #42 on: March 21, 2003, 02:29:02 PM »
"body counts" are so viet nam, nobody uses body counts anymore, now they just count how many are still shooting back at you, thats the only number thats important
Logged

Offline Hristo

  • Parolee
  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1150
Iraqi losses ?
« Reply #43 on: March 21, 2003, 02:39:50 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Toad
Hristo, would you be in support of this war if there had been another UN SC resolution beyond 1441 authorizing the US to take action?

Only need a simple yes or no, not a dodge. Thx.


Yes.

This way Bush made a mockery of UN.
Logged

Offline Furious

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3243
Iraqi losses ?
« Reply #44 on: March 21, 2003, 03:35:17 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Hristo
Yes.

This way Bush made a mockery of UN.


The UN is deserving of mockery.
Logged
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 ... 8   Go Up
« previous next »