Author Topic: I don't think it's realistic to expect women to urinate standing up (Read 624 times)

Swoop · « **on:** May 27, 2003, 02:40:10 PM »

The iLoo is not yet dead.....

http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/54/30888.html

"You're In Control" has as many potential uses as we have toilet gags. The system "uses computation to enhance the act of urination. Sensors in the back of a urinal detect the position of a stream of urine, enabling people to play interactive games on a screen mounted above the urinal," according to the website.

SOB · « **Reply #1 on:** May 27, 2003, 02:42:30 PM »

Lovely, this needs no introduction...

http://www.restrooms.org/standing.html

10Bears · « **Reply #2 on:** May 27, 2003, 03:16:05 PM »

Quote

"There's a lot of competition in toilets," notes Dan, who explains that the system lends itself to multiplayer games. "It really would be pissing contest," he points out. But the potential for interactive entertainment doesn't stop there.

"There are also carnival games: squirting water into clown's mouth where the balloon inflates."

No wonder clowns look so unhappy when they're offstage. If only they knew

Good Lord!!

OIO · « **Reply #3 on:** May 27, 2003, 03:55:23 PM »

its gotta be for women.

Us guys are happy with "tag the turd" game. Been entertaining for 5 thousand years, a classic with unlimited replay value.

john9001 · « **Reply #4 on:** May 27, 2003, 04:44:17 PM »

Gabrielle can write her name in the snow?

Hangtime · « **Reply #5 on:** May 27, 2003, 04:48:36 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by john9001
Gabrielle can write her name in the snow?

only if her name was once gregory.

Curval · « **Reply #6 on:** May 27, 2003, 05:10:35 PM »

Do they "have" to stand up? I mean, can't they just open their legs a bit, look down and aim by wiggling their buts?

Udie · « **Reply #7 on:** May 27, 2003, 05:35:27 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Curval
Do they "have" to stand up? I mean, can't they just open their legs a bit, look down and aim by wiggling their buts?

sure if the target is the sides of their legs

Tarmac · « **Reply #8 on:** May 27, 2003, 05:35:30 PM »

More efficient to aim the gun and turret, not the whole battleship. Men will always be superior in this respect.

Monitor vs. Merrimack is still teaching lessons today.

Curval · « **Reply #9 on:** May 27, 2003, 06:12:59 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Tarmac
More efficient to aim the gun and turret, not the whole battleship. Men will always be superior in this respect.

Monitor vs. Merrimack is still teaching lessons today.

My sig line for a while. It just says it all.

Tarmac · « **Reply #10 on:** May 27, 2003, 09:52:23 PM »

Octavius · « **Reply #11 on:** May 27, 2003, 10:45:39 PM »

ROFL!!

What scares me is that SOB replied with blazing speed. He seems to have been waiting for the right moment to unleash that link!

I think I would turn to stone if I saw his full bookmark list

SOB · « **Reply #12 on:** May 27, 2003, 11:13:32 PM »

LOL! I actually had a link in mind and I went searching for it, but this was the first thing I clicked on and I decided there was no need to go any further. The link I was looking for was for a device that's made of cardboard and is designed for the purpose of allowing a woman to pee standing up. Aww hell...here it is!

And yes, I saved them both to my favorites

SOB

Holden McGroin · « **Reply #13 on:** May 27, 2003, 11:43:31 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Tarmac
Monitor vs. Merrimack is still teaching lessons today.

"It was the Virginia that fought that yankee boat from hell!
Only uncultured yankee dogs continue to call it the Merrimack"

Tarmac · « **Reply #14 on:** May 28, 2003, 01:56:17 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by Holden McGroin

"It was the Virginia that fought that yankee boat from hell!
Only uncultured yankee dogs continue to call it the Merrimack"

Hey, it was our ship first. Knew I'd catch flak for that one.

Besides, "Monitor vs CSS Virginia" just ain't a catchy name for a rumble.