« previous next »
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: Partial victory, it's a start anyway!  (Read 246 times)

Offline Udie

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3395
Partial victory, it's a start anyway!
« on: October 21, 2003, 05:08:34 PM »
click :D me


 There are a couple of great quotes in the article.....

Quote
The president, said Sen. Frank Lautenberg, D-N.J. "will become the first United States president to criminalize a safe medical procedure." Doctors who violate the ban would be subject to prison terms of up to two years.



LOL!  Safe for who?  the doctors? :rolleyes:
Logged

Offline Udie

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3395
Partial victory, it's a start anyway!
« Reply #1 on: October 21, 2003, 06:24:26 PM »
nothin from the left or right? :confused:
Logged

Offline vorticon

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7935
Partial victory, it's a start anyway!
« Reply #2 on: October 21, 2003, 06:31:47 PM »
...good for him...thats just a terrible way to abort...if your going to abort do it during first 3 months of pregnancy...
Logged

Offline midnight Target

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15114
Partial victory, it's a start anyway!
« Reply #3 on: October 21, 2003, 06:50:26 PM »
Stupid to outlaw something that is so rare, that the exceptions to the law will still allow the same number of procedures to be done. Playing politics with lives... sad.
Quote

Third-trimester abortions: Medical intervention to terminate pregnancies during the third trimester is quite rare. The Alan Guttmacher Institute estimates that 1% of all medical terminations of pregnancies are done at or after 21 weeks - (1994 data). It is sometimes done when the fetus has died in the womb. Termination of the life of a live fetus is generally prohibited by medical societies' regulations after the 20th or 21st week of gestation.  Exceptions do occur if required to save the life of the woman or avoid very serious, disabling health consequences. e.g.:   To save the life or health of a women experiencing a deteriorating health problem. This problem can rapidly grow worse with every day in late pregnancy. It is most often caused by diabetes or heart disease.  
 In rare cases, the delivery of the fetus can go terribly wrong, threatening the life of the woman.  
 

 At this point, the physician and patient have only two reasonable medical options:

 D&X abortions: (a.k.a PBAs): The cervix is dilated. The fetus is delivered feet-first. Its brain is removed. This shrinks the fetal head, and kills the fetus. The fetus can then be removed with less damage to the woman. About 0.04% of all abortions involve a D&X procedure.  
 Hysterotomy: This is major surgery, essentially identical to a Caesarian Section. It involves significantly higher risk to a woman than a D&X
 
Logged

Offline Shuckins

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3412
Partial victory, it's a start anyway!
« Reply #4 on: October 21, 2003, 07:31:57 PM »
My God.

If the child is healthy...why not attempt the Caesarean?  

Will somebody explain...PLEASE... why the life of the mother takes precedence over that of the child?  Threats to the health of the mother always seem to be given a higher priority than that of an unborn child.   By the third trimester of a pregnancy the argument that it is just a "fetus" no longer applies.

Shuckins
Logged

Offline Sandman

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 17620
Partial victory, it's a start anyway!
« Reply #5 on: October 21, 2003, 08:39:51 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Shuckins
Will somebody explain...PLEASE... why the life of the mother takes precedence over that of the child?  



Sometimes, it all comes down to priorities.
Logged
sand
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »