As a former proponent and user of the 1c almost exclusively, I'm starting to wonder if something about it's guns aren't overmodelled. (Actually I think it's the hispanos.) I don't want to start a 100 post thread about whether or not the guns are overdone, but I will ask if Pyro can check and see if there is a bug with the power of the Hispanos? While I don't believe the plane itself is better than any others, something is strange with the guns IMO.
I rarely fly the 1c for air to air anymore, except for bomber intercepts and JABO. Tonight I flew one sortie in it to hunt down bishop bombers over V51. I knocked off a b26's tail with only 2 pings on my FE. Any other plane that I've used would need anywhere from 10 - 25 hits to do that. The hispanos also seem to have an amazing punch against tanks. It is probably true that the hispano 20mm was (when working) likely the best gun used during WWII. It had a higher muzzle velocity and greater bullet mass compared to the MG151, which equals greater punch. My question is whether or not a hispano round could penetrate the armor of a panzer IV? Honestly, I'm sure that it could probably penetrate the top armor, but there's no way it could be as devestating as it seems to be in AH. (If it was, why weren't 4 20mm versions of the spit used to kill tanks?)
(My reasoning as to if a Hispano round could penetrate tank armor, is that P47s armed with 8 50cal often knocked out Panzers. They did this by shooting behind the tank and bouncing rounds into the engine.
)
Pyro, can you check and see if something has happened to the hispanos to make them so leathal? There are just too many people complaining about them recently to not have something wrong.
All of the above are just my own opinions of course.
I'd hate to see weazel quit because of a small bug with the Hispanos.
------------------
bloom25
THUNDERBIRDS