« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2 3   Go Down

Author Topic: Field Artillery  (Read 2381 times)

Offline aerosaber

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 93
      • http://www.tampapi.com
Field Artillery
« on: July 21, 2008, 02:34:51 PM »
Heavy self propelled guns. The Russian ISU-152 would be perfect, big, bad, and ugly. It could be aimed the same way you aim the guns on a cv. Artillery is the one arm of combat that has been completely left out of AH.
Logged

Offline ian5440

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 451
      • http://rollingthunder.spruz.com/main.asp
Re: Field Artillery
« Reply #1 on: July 21, 2008, 02:55:29 PM »
Artillery seems like its getting more popular an the wishlist forum???
Logged
~~~~~~Hellkitty Dweeb~~~~~~
~~~~~~Wildcat Dweeb~~~~~~~

Offline Masherbrum

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 22420
Re: Field Artillery
« Reply #2 on: July 21, 2008, 04:36:12 PM »
Quote from: aerosaber on July 21, 2008, 02:34:51 PM
Heavy self propelled guns. The Russian ISU-152 would be perfect, big, bad, and ugly. It could be aimed the same way you aim the guns on a cv. Artillery is the one arm of combat that has been completely left out of AH.

 :confused:

It didn't even have a turret, so the "aimed the same way as guns on cv" is out of the question.   Only way to aim horizontally is to move the entire vehicle on it's axis.   Translation:  A sitting duck.   
Logged
MSI X670E MAG Tomahawk - Ryzen 7 9800X3D - Noctua DH-15 Chromax Black
64GB G.Skill Flare DDR5-6000 - ASRock 7900 XTX - Corsair RM1000e - Lian Li O11D EVO RGB

Offline stephen

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 744
Re: Field Artillery
« Reply #3 on: July 21, 2008, 05:24:46 PM »
or just tow an 88m in, emplace it, and kill a bunch of birds with one stone. :pray
Logged
Spell checker is for Morrons

Offline Motherland

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8110
Re: Field Artillery
« Reply #4 on: July 21, 2008, 05:39:13 PM »
The Tiger has an 88mm, doesn't it? Or is it a different gun?
Logged

Offline aerosaber

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 93
      • http://www.tampapi.com
Re: Field Artillery
« Reply #5 on: July 21, 2008, 05:46:58 PM »
LTV4  has a fixed gun also but spins 360, just another reminder that this IS NOT REAL...lol
Logged

Offline Masherbrum

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 22420
Re: Field Artillery
« Reply #6 on: July 21, 2008, 06:07:36 PM »
Quote from: aerosaber on July 21, 2008, 05:46:58 PM
LTV4  has a fixed gun also but spins 360, just another reminder that this IS NOT REAL...lol

Thanks, you just let me know that this is REAL LIFE! 
Logged
MSI X670E MAG Tomahawk - Ryzen 7 9800X3D - Noctua DH-15 Chromax Black
64GB G.Skill Flare DDR5-6000 - ASRock 7900 XTX - Corsair RM1000e - Lian Li O11D EVO RGB

Offline SmokinLoon

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6168
Re: Field Artillery
« Reply #7 on: July 22, 2008, 09:05:19 AM »
The Soviet ISU-152 wasnt field arty, it was a direct fire cannon.  Someone correct me if I am wrong, but I thought it was used as a tank destroyer more than anything, yes?

Field arty = US 105 Howitzer via jeep, 75mm pack howitzer (via donkeys, of course  :D ); Soviet 122mm howitzer; UK 25 pounder (86mm?); Jap 7cm Type 92 Inf cannon; German 15cm Inf cannon; etc 
Logged
Proud grandson of the late Lt. Col. Darrell M. "Bud" Gray, USAF (ret.), B24D pilot, 5th BG/72nd BS. 28 combat missions within the "slot", PTO.

Offline Kweassa

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6425
Re: Field Artillery
« Reply #8 on: July 22, 2008, 11:09:33 AM »

 Bring on the 88!

 Field Artillery/AA mode included!

 

 
Logged

Offline Ghosth

  • AH Training Corps (retired)
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8497
      • http://332nd.org
Re: Field Artillery
« Reply #9 on: July 23, 2008, 05:50:36 AM »
Bring on towed arty by all means!

5 min or more setup/takedown time during which you are highly visible from the air.
And extremely vulnerable to damage.

After setup camo nets go up your very hard to spot from the air.

With of course both flak ammo and AP/antitank rounds.

I suspect the problem is coordinating between the gun and driver of the support vehicle.
That bugger could be nasty to coad.

I'm not sure even HT can pull that rabbit out of the hat.
Logged

Offline saantana

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 763
      • Dywizjon 308
Re: Field Artillery
« Reply #10 on: July 23, 2008, 06:20:14 AM »
I think its a good idea.
I like it  :aok
Logged
Saantana
308 Polish Squadron RAF
http://dywizjon308.servegame.org

"I have fought a good fight, I have finished the course, I have kept my faith"

Offline SD67

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3218
Re: Field Artillery
« Reply #11 on: July 23, 2008, 08:00:08 AM »
Quote from: Ghosth on July 23, 2008, 05:50:36 AM
That bugger could be nasty to coad.

I'm not sure even HT can pull that rabbit out of the hat.
HT is the coad GOD! he can coad anything! :rock
Logged
9GIAP VVS RKKA
You're under arrest for violation of the Government knows best act!
Fabricati diem, punc
Absinthe makes the Tart grow fonder

Offline 100goon

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 253
Re: Field Artillery
« Reply #12 on: July 23, 2008, 08:32:11 AM »
Quote from: Motherland on July 21, 2008, 05:39:13 PM
The Tiger has an 88mm, doesn't it? Or is it a different gun?


92mm
Logged
Claim Jumpers

Offline Pannono

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1101
Re: Field Artillery
« Reply #13 on: July 27, 2008, 11:11:34 PM »
Logged
Pannono
Proud Member of Pigs On The Wing
8 Player H2H: 2006-07
MA Tours: 87, 97-113, 143-144, 160-Present
FSO: JG54

Offline Cthulhu

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2463
Re: Field Artillery
« Reply #14 on: July 28, 2008, 01:32:02 PM »
Quote from: Masherbrum on July 21, 2008, 04:36:12 PM
:confused:

It didn't even have a turret, so the "aimed the same way as guns on cv" is out of the question.   Only way to aim horizontally is to move the entire vehicle on it's axis.   Translation:  A sitting duck.   
:huh  No, but the gun could be slewed in azimuth over about +-10 degrees just like all the other German & Russian tank destroyers of the period. Hardly a "Sitting Duck". Su-152's were used as both tank destroyers & as a self-propelled howitzer. The ISU-152 was an improvement, being based on the IS-2 chassic instead of the earlier (and uglier) KV-1. It was referred to unofficially as the "Animal Killer" because of what it could do to Tigers (both flavors) and the Panther. Though low velocity, the 107lb :uhoh AP round did a number on anything it hit. A very effective weapon. :aok

Always best to do your homework. ;)
Logged
"Think of Tetris as a metaphor for life:  You spend all your time trying to find a place for your long thin piece, then when you finally do, everything you've built disappears"
Pages: [1] 2 3   Go Up
« previous next »