Author Topic: Jobs  (Read 505 times)

Offline AKIron

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 13322
Jobs
« on: November 06, 2003, 12:21:42 PM »
It's about jobs stupid, no wait, it's about the economy, no wait, it's about the war.

http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/ap/20031106/ap_on_bi_ge/greenspan_economy_5
Here we put salt on Margaritas, not sidewalks.

Offline Wanker

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4030
Jobs
« Reply #1 on: November 06, 2003, 12:26:35 PM »
No, in reality, its about finding any reason for people to vote for the Democratic candidate in 2004. Jobs, War, Economy are just a few of the legitimate subjects to argue for or against a sitting president.

Are you saying that a party that is trying to remove an incumbent president can't attack said president on multiple issues?

Before you cry foul, just remember that both parties do it, depending which party has the presidency in any given election.

Offline gofaster

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6622
Jobs
« Reply #2 on: November 06, 2003, 12:27:42 PM »
Speaking of jobs, how can someone claim that they didn't get paid overtime, when they work a 24-hour job?

Offline Mickey1992

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3362
Jobs
« Reply #3 on: November 06, 2003, 12:35:07 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by gofaster
Speaking of jobs, how can someone claim that they didn't get paid overtime, when they work a 24-hour job?


How can someone who's "job" is simply to allow themselves to be video monitored 24 hours a day claim they are working overtime?

If someone pays me $300 a week to housesit for them, can I turn around and say they owe me overtime because I "worked" for them 24 hours a day?

Offline AKIron

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 13322
Jobs
« Reply #4 on: November 06, 2003, 12:44:12 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by banana
No, in reality, its about finding any reason for people to vote for the Democratic candidate in 2004. Jobs, War, Economy are just a few of the legitimate subjects to argue for or against a sitting president.

Are you saying that a party that is trying to remove an incumbent president can't attack said president on multiple issues?

Before you cry foul, just remember that both parties do it, depending which party has the presidency in any given election.


I'm only mocking those that have spun so much they are now dizzy and don't know which way to go.
Here we put salt on Margaritas, not sidewalks.

Offline Wanker

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4030
Jobs
« Reply #5 on: November 06, 2003, 12:49:15 PM »
Well, desperate times call for desparate measures! :lol

Offline Rude

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4609
Jobs
« Reply #6 on: November 06, 2003, 01:08:37 PM »
This thread will die soon as it has far too much to do with the truth....shame on you.

Offline gofaster

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6622
Jobs
« Reply #7 on: November 06, 2003, 01:14:56 PM »
Well at least I planted the seed for a discussion about voyeur dorms and strippers being lopped into the same category as musicians, actors, and athletes. :p