Author Topic: Political Compas (Read 2599 times)

strk · « **Reply #30 on:** November 17, 2003, 02:16:28 PM »

Quote

btw who is Jean Chrétien ?

I dont know but I am over there with him too.
check out this page
http://www.digitalronin.f2s.com/politicalcompass/extremeright.html
at the bottom it has a graph showing the placementn of political parties on the graph. Notice where the "liberal democrats" are - on the right/libertarian side!! that was a suprise.

strk

Octavius · « **Reply #31 on:** November 17, 2003, 02:19:42 PM »

Did it again answered "strongly disagree" to every question.

Gave me this:

Economic Left/Right: 0.00
Libertarian/Authoritarian: -4.36

Answered "strongly agree" to every question and got this:

Economic Left/Right: 0.00
Libertarian/Authoritarian: 4.36

I did not create the test therefore I haven't a clue as to how it's scored. But economically there seem to exist the same number of questions. Socially... well it seems to lean whichever way you answer your questions.

mrblack · « **Reply #32 on:** November 17, 2003, 02:32:23 PM »

LOL i'm with the Pope

miko2d · « **Reply #33 on:** November 17, 2003, 02:34:07 PM »

Hooligan: Some of those statements are very interesting. Take the first one:
"If economic globalisation is inevitable, it should primarily serve humanity rather than the interests of trans-national corporations."

So this presumes that the interests of corporations are necessarily opposite the interests of humanity? I find this rather odd.

Not "interesting", the words you are looking for are "loaded", "biased" and "nonsensical".

Like am inquisition questionnaire that would ask "Should witches be burned or impaled on a stake?".

miko

FUNKED1 · « **Reply #34 on:** November 17, 2003, 02:41:09 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Hooligan
Some of those statements are very interesting. Take the first one:

"If economic globalisation is inevitable, it should primarily serve humanity rather than the interests of trans-national corporations."

So this presumes that the interests of corporations are necessarily opposite the interests of humanity? I find this rather odd.

Bingo. There were several questions like that.

Dune · « **Reply #35 on:** November 17, 2003, 03:03:14 PM »

Your political compass
Economic Left/Right: 1.00
Libertarian/Authoritarian: 1.33

But I do like how the pope is on the same side as Mugabe, Arafat and Hussein.

Duedel · « **Reply #36 on:** November 17, 2003, 03:04:57 PM »

Dalai Lama here

we had a similar test in Germany. These questions are not definite and therefore not correct to answer.

miko2d · « **Reply #37 on:** November 17, 2003, 03:05:29 PM »

even more it presumes that globalisation is a process that can be controlled rather than enabled or disabled.

In fact it's just like "Democracy".

Saying should democracy benefit people's material wellbeing or their spiritual level is nonsensical. The democracy is a spontaneous process and if you allow it, you cannot choose which way it will take you.
If you do control it, it will not be democracy by definition.

Anyone who even thinks that "globalisation" that can either benefit poor or corporations and that humans can have some control over it are not talking about the real globalisation - the free trade, they are talking about some kind of colonialism.

Free market and free trade by definition benefit everyone because otherwise the parties would not engage in it. Obviously it benefits poor more than it benefits rich because rich can do without few more dollars but the poor would probably starve without those few more dollars and their economies would never develop without going through primitive capitalism stage.

miko

ravells · « **Reply #38 on:** November 17, 2003, 03:07:43 PM »

miko!

We've dont that one to death already!

Ravs

AKIron · « **Reply #39 on:** November 17, 2003, 03:22:30 PM »

Almost got the bullseye. What do I win?

Ripsnort · « **Reply #40 on:** November 17, 2003, 03:38:10 PM »

I trust anyone within 3 (+/- .5) of bullseye. Anyone outside of 3, or -3, I would consider a threat and would certainly not trust them, whether that would be in a sense of pumping gas, or watching over their own children.

midnight Target · « **Reply #41 on:** November 17, 2003, 03:52:51 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Ripsnort
"Compass"

Economic Left/Right: 2.75
Libertarian/Authoritarian: 0.87

I wonder where that "3" came from. You sure you didn't mean 2.8?

Ripsnort · « **Reply #42 on:** November 17, 2003, 04:01:27 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by midnight Target
I wonder where that "3" came from. You sure you didn't mean 2.8?

you missed the "+/- .5" part I see. Typical, never read it all the way, just what you want to read into it.

Dnil · « **Reply #43 on:** November 17, 2003, 04:07:32 PM »

egads iron, i think we were seperated at birth.

Otto · « **Reply #44 on:** November 17, 2003, 04:10:11 PM »

Economic Left/Right: 4.12

Libertarian/Authoritarian: 0.46

Good, this confirms my self view.