Author Topic: Royal accomodations... would you?  (Read 861 times)

Offline Wanker

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4030
Royal accomodations... would you?
« Reply #15 on: November 19, 2003, 11:18:11 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by DmdNexus
Gams are legs... specifically CALVES - NOT BREASTS...

Sheesh Read a Sam Malone novel!


Doh! I sit corrected!


Jubblies? :lol :lol


:rofl

Jubblies....

:aok

Offline DmdNexus

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 901
Royal accomodations... would you?
« Reply #16 on: November 19, 2003, 11:18:53 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Octavius
[BEven if I had the chance, a paper bag on her head wouldn't do the job.:D [/B]


She's definately a double bagger.

Any one can ride a horse... it takes a true aristocrat to look like one.

Offline midnight Target

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15114
Royal accomodations... would you?
« Reply #17 on: November 19, 2003, 11:23:57 AM »
Next time you call Gams breasts, yer gettin a gat to the melon wit yer java.... ya moke.

Offline Octavius

  • Skinner Team
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6651
Royal accomodations... would you?
« Reply #18 on: November 19, 2003, 11:41:20 AM »
Jolly good show man.  I'm terribly sorry but do inspect these translators .  It will convert your everydeay speech intoh some propah bullshit! wooht!

Yer fools! oi invented slang. de Oirish prefer any sort av diddies, jugees, bazoomers, mams, jugs, an' jubblies. aye swoop?

Guid day, scottsmen loch them too.

Or 'a abaht a lil' cockney rhymin'? many loike threepenny bits, boobs, bazoomers, mams, jugs, jubblies or knockers.

Yorksha? wha' t' 'ell is dis? 'eh, these translators rock. 'a close atteur?
octavius
Fat Drunk BasTards (forum)

"bastard coated bastards with bastard filling?  delicious!"
Guest of the ++Blue Knights++[/size]

Offline ravells

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1982
Royal accomodations... would you?
« Reply #19 on: November 19, 2003, 11:51:52 AM »
me main geeza octavius,

what an bangin wes'ite. fank yous so much fe introducin me to hit. I as bookmarked hit fe future uses.

ravs - Is it coz I iz black?

Offline miko2d

  • Parolee
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3177
Royal accomodations... would you?
« Reply #20 on: November 19, 2003, 12:39:52 PM »
Getting Laura pregnant may be a good touch for the upcoming elections. He may have little else by then...

 miko

Offline SOB

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10138
Re: Re: Royal accomodations... would you?
« Reply #21 on: November 19, 2003, 01:20:41 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Ripsnort
What makes you think they'd need condoms? Most responsible parents, once finished with having children, take more effective measures to prevent over-populating the world (Please remove Catholics, Mormens, and Islamics from this equation)

Sorry to interrupt your subtle bashing with facts, but the LDS church doesn't forbid birth control.  (LDS AKA Mormons)
Three Times One Minus One.  Dayum!

Offline aztec

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1800
Royal accomodations... would you?
« Reply #22 on: November 19, 2003, 03:51:09 PM »
SOB when you are as attention starved as Rip then facts are just trivial little things that get in the way.

Offline AKIron

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 13324
Re: Re: Re: Royal accomodations... would you?
« Reply #23 on: November 19, 2003, 04:59:48 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by SOB
Sorry to interrupt your subtle bashing with facts, but the LDS church doesn't forbid birth control.  (LDS AKA Mormons)


They certainly don't encourage it either.
Here we put salt on Margaritas, not sidewalks.