Martlet: Every time I address a comment to you, you answer it while explaining "this one time" you're reading it, but remember, I'm on ignore".
If by "every time" you mean this first and only time since I .ignored you, you are certainly correct. If you mean that I have ever read your posts after putting you on ignore, let alone reply to them, you are lying.
You may well have addressed comments to me which I would not have seen and I often add to my original statements. So what?
Like i said, if you can't tell the difference between an advertisement and an OpEd, then I'm not the least bit surprised you've become the poster boy for liberal propaganda.
When the same person is claiming directly opposite things in an OpEd and advertisement, that person is a liar. I do not care if he was paid to lie. In their speeches those people often insist that they are honest and cannot be bought. They also say they would not advertise if they did not truky believe in a product.
Dago: Miko, Did you ever wonder if maybe, everyone else disagrees with you
Hardly "everyone".
Or, if you think everyone is jerk
I don't. I don't even think everyone is ignorant. When I call someone names, it's personal. I do not believe I've ever said "you all are..." about anything.
Nayway, just because I caught a couple of scumbags on obvious lie that millions can hear, how come you treat it as if I personally offended you?
While we have never had a shortage of fools saying just this kind of stuff, funny thing is that isn't happened yet.
People were saying for a long time that socialism in USSR was going to crumble. They even explained why and how. They were not all fools. In fact, the smarter they were, the earlier they predicted the downfall.
"It" is happening and has been for a long time. The size of government, the relative share of government expenses in GDP, the number of laws and regulations, their intrusiveness, centralisation, etc. - all those attributes of socialism are growing.
Miko, please tell us a little about yourself...
While posting here, I've told pretty much all you are asking already. I have quite an impressive credentals, education and experience. Relatively recently I would have said I was very accomplished and successfull in life.
What does it matter? I always try to explain how I came to my opinions, not just state them. I am always ready to elaborate any details. So you do not have to rely on my creditials to evaluate my statements.
In this particilar case, one hardly needs much education to understand that a radio show host said contradictory things.
If credentials would make you take the stuff said on this board seriously, then you are a fool. This board is not a source of education. You do not get education from a chat but from books by people most accomplished in the subject. At best, this board should arouse an interest in particular area of the study by exposing you to the views of different people.
I have to believe you are a man of great accomplishments and deeds to place yourself in judgement of so many and institutions.
If you believe what you just said, you'll believe anything. So I am channeling the spirit of the great president professor Woodrow Wilson. Just keep it our little secret.
john9001: i'm really sorry your workers paradise colasped and you are now forced to live in the represive USA.
So you think my dislike for socialism and insessant critique of it means that I love socialism and regret the downfall of Soviet Union. You are an idiot.
lord dolf vader: communists seems like a odd use of the word. dumb and patriotic ill give ya.
One can be dumb and patriotic while adhering to any political persuasion. Only those who call for more governmental control over economy, production, distribution, private property and other aspects of human life while claiming to be defending the interests of the people and appealing to people for support - those are communists.
ever notice people with extremly high i.q.s are almost always capitolists. but people with ultra high i.q.s are almost never capitolists. forest for the trees thing.
You are rising a facinating issue. I have just recenty read a paper that mentioned the same thing. Like bus drivers have more accident with low IQ but also with high IQ - being too bored and distracted, same seems to influence the politicians.
The hypothesis is that people who are too smart are often incapable of going through years of heavy, persistent, often boring work required to start a successfull business. So they go to academia (which is influenced by leftists). They have theoretical knowlege but have no idea how the world actually works in order to compare the theory with practice and decide which theory makes sense.
Gunthr: Either that, or you just enjoy poking holes in these obvious ironies of culture in a free country...
If we should not believe what they say for money in the commercials, why should we believe what they say for money in the editorial? That is of course, a rhetorical question.
So yes, it was an irony of catching them liars saying opposite things withing the same minute.
it might be fun to call up the Savage show and back him into a corner with your observations.
I will certainly try and if I get through, I will report on the results.
miko