Author Topic: Clipboard AWACS and IFF  (Read 852 times)

Offline -ammo-

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5124
Clipboard AWACS and IFF
« Reply #15 on: December 05, 2001, 04:04:00 PM »
Please, give it a rest. HTC KNOWS how you fell about the way they do radar...we all do (boy do we)
Commanding Officer, 56 Fighter Group
Retired USAF - 1988 - 2011

Offline funkedup

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9466
      • http://www.raf303.org/
Clipboard AWACS and IFF
« Reply #16 on: December 05, 2001, 04:09:00 PM »
Ammo I'm pretty sure HTC know the differences between their system and WWII systems, and they know it a lot better than I do.  The message is not intended for them.  It's intended to enlighten players, who have shown lack of knowledge of how the game works vs how things worked in WWII.  If you already understand and don't want to hear about it, don't reply, and the thread will quickly drop off the front page.

[ 12-05-2001: Message edited by: funkedup ]

Offline -ammo-

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5124
Clipboard AWACS and IFF
« Reply #17 on: December 05, 2001, 04:16:00 PM »
Bud, its my UBB to enjoy too, and I read it as you do, and reply as you do. Press on with your "enlightenment" for others, we *all* certainly appreciate it.  But certainly know if you continue with your radar agenda (personally I think its worth a try, I new nothing else till I came here from WB's in '99) you will see posts like mine.
Commanding Officer, 56 Fighter Group
Retired USAF - 1988 - 2011

Offline funkedup

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9466
      • http://www.raf303.org/
Clipboard AWACS and IFF
« Reply #18 on: December 05, 2001, 04:34:00 PM »
Sure, no problem, I understand all that.

Actually my "agenda" (three posts in a week) is about out of ammo anyways.  I had three points to make:

1.  The MA is quite crowded, so the "finding the fight" argument for AWACS is dead.

2.  AWACS gives us capabilities to use day fighters to make blind intercepts of maneuvering targets, well enough to get within guns range, something that could not be done so easily in WWII.

3.  AWACS gives us instant IFF capability of distant bandits that was not equalled by WWII day fighters.

That's the extent of my agenda.  I don't have any more points to make.  But they were distinct points, and needed to be made seperately.  The longer a thread goes, the less communication occurs, due to hijacking and short attention spans, so I used three seperate threads to do this.

And in the course of all this I found some answers that I am pleased with.  There are some new radar settings (to be first used in Big Week) that will enable in-flight and tower radar modes to be set up differently from each other.  And HTC have increased their effort in developing the Combat Theater into a viable 24/7 arena.  Put those two together and I am a happy camper.

[ 12-05-2001: Message edited by: funkedup ]

Offline hblair

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4051
      • http://www.cybrtyme.com/personal/hblair/mainpage.htm
Clipboard AWACS and IFF
« Reply #19 on: December 05, 2001, 04:52:00 PM »
Interesting post funked. Thanks.

Offline lazs1

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 996
Clipboard AWACS and IFF
« Reply #20 on: December 05, 2001, 04:56:00 PM »
'There is a reason they flew in formations and planned their flights and stayed in contact on the radio. To reduce this kind of chasing."

guess what?  that ain't gonna happen.  The Ah world is nothing like WWII was.   Lone wolf fighters were not lurking at alt to take out fighters taking off or landing or nursing shot up planes a few miles from their base.   The clipboard is a gamey cheezy substitute for the organization, dedication and equipment that was radar.   course it's no cheezier than a monitor substituting for a real world.

You think removing dot dar will make people sit in the tower "communicating" or fly finger fours or missions?  LOL!   At best it will allow a little more of the gamey lone wolf "sneak up and run away" style and at worst it will make for more gangbangs and chase the dot idiocy while simple decreasing the "kills per time" stat.

Like pop said... "this is a GOOD thing?"
lazs
"

Offline hblair

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4051
      • http://www.cybrtyme.com/personal/hblair/mainpage.htm
Clipboard AWACS and IFF
« Reply #21 on: December 05, 2001, 06:02:00 PM »
What happened to the trolling lazs? Your all serious now. Getting concerned? Go take a geritol, it might calm you down.

Offline Creamo

  • Parolee
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5976
      • http://www.fatchicksinpartyhats.com
Clipboard AWACS and IFF
« Reply #22 on: December 05, 2001, 06:20:00 PM »
I thought you were talking about the MA.
 
Can't see no reason why not to make The Combat Theater into a viable 24/7 arena if it's this realism that would fill it up.

I thought that's the way it was already, but never go there because it's empty.

Offline -ammo-

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5124
Clipboard AWACS and IFF
« Reply #23 on: December 05, 2001, 06:37:00 PM »
Oh I thought funked meant the MA too. It would definately be a good idea in the CT to lose the dot dar in flight for both sides.
Commanding Officer, 56 Fighter Group
Retired USAF - 1988 - 2011

Offline Sundog

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1781
Clipboard AWACS and IFF
« Reply #24 on: December 05, 2001, 09:15:00 PM »
You aren't sneaking that 'No agenda' stuff by me Funked. I recognize a 'passive' attempt to get the P-61 into AH.

So the real question is, when are we getting the P-61 and He-219 in AH?   :D

Offline funkedup

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9466
      • http://www.raf303.org/
Clipboard AWACS and IFF
« Reply #25 on: December 06, 2001, 01:36:00 AM »
Actually I'm trying for a Mosquito night fighter with two-stage Merlins.   :)

Offline Seeker

  • Parolee
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2653
Clipboard AWACS and IFF
« Reply #26 on: December 06, 2001, 08:08:00 AM »
"Actually I'm trying for a Mosquito night fighter with two-stage Merlins. "

Shouldn't that have two clipboards as well, one for the radio operator?