Author Topic: Sunken Voight Corsair F4U-1 fighters stay  (Read 2596 times)

Offline LePaul

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7988
Sunken Voight Corsair F4U-1 fighters stay
« on: November 25, 2003, 10:32:01 AM »
...from todays BangorDailyNews online (here in Bangor, Maine USA)...

Two WWII fighter planes will remain submerged

PORTLAND - Two World War II fighter planes at the bottom of Sebago Lake since a training accident in 1944 will remain there, a federal judge ruled Monday.

Historic Aircraft Restoration Corp. found one of the sunken planes in July through the use of sonar images and a remote-controlled underwater video camera.

The company sued for permission to salvage the Corsairs out of Sebago Lake, Maine's deepest. The state and the British government, whose two pilots died in the crash, objected.

U.S. District Judge George Z. Singal said it's not his place to decide.

Part of the company's argument is under "the law of salvage" and "the law of finds," both of which fall under the broader designation of "admiralty law." Federal courts have exclusive jurisdiction in admiralty cases.

Singal ruled that admiralty law does not apply in the case because Sebago Lake is not navigable for federal purposes.

"Sebago Lake is considered a 'great pond' " he wrote, "and the Lake, its contents and the submerged land underneath are held in trust by the State of Maine for the public. From approximately 1830 until 1870, it was possible to navigate from Sebago Lake to the Atlantic Ocean via the Cumberland & Oxford Canal. However, for well over a century, Sebago Lake has been essentially landlocked and navigation is limited to other connected bodies of water within Maine."

Singal rejected an argument that any salvage operation falls under admiralty law.

By dismissing the case, Singal essentially ruled for the Maine and British governments.

Peter Hess, an admiralty lawyer who represented Historic Aircraft Recovery, said he expects the company will appeal to the U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals in Boston.

"Historic Aircraft Recovery is the party that found this plane, the first one to find it and the only party that knows where it is and, fair to say, the only party that has the wherewithal and the experience to recover it and properly restore it so it can be enjoyed by the public at large," he said. "We hope to be able to do so."

Assistant Attorney General William H. Laubenstein III, said that "at this point, it appears the aircraft is at the bottom of Sebago Lake and property of the State of Maine."

The gull-winged planes are Voight Corsair F4U-1 fighters. They took off on May 16, 1944 from the Brunswick Naval Air Station.

The planes collided over Sebago Lake. Killed were Royal Navy pilots Vaughan Reginald Gill and Raymond L. Knott.

There are only a handful of F4U Corsairs in flying condition in the United States and they're worth roughly $1 million each, aviation experts say.

Even a muck-covered hulk is worth upward of $800,000 because the airplane can be restored as an original Corsair.

Offline gofaster

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6622
Sunken Voight Corsair F4U-1 fighters stay
« Reply #1 on: November 25, 2003, 01:55:01 PM »
There have been several similar incidents where private organizations have wanted to salvage US Navy planes for restoration and preservation, but the US Navy has refused to relinquish its claim on the equipment.  Unlike the Air Force, which will strike a plane from its records after x number of years, or will otherwise permit private organizations to obtain samples of old aircraft for salvage and restoration under certain conditions and restrictions, the US Navy will maintain an on-going non-expiring right and title to vintage aircraft.

I remember one case where an old Grumman biplane fighter was located in deep water, in pristine condition, by a private firm with the intent of raising it, restoring it, and displaying it to the public.  The Navy refused to give up its title to the aircraft (most likely so that it could recover the aircraft itself) and when the private firm returned to the site years later, the plane had been severely damaged by fishing nets and Navy divers and recovery wasn't economically viable.

I'm guessing that, in the case of the 2 Corsairs, since they were British planes, the private salvage firm hoped the British government would be more receptive to the preservation of its history and permit experts in aircraft salvage and restoration to recover the two planes.

For some intersesting stories about bungled salvage operations by the government, you should read some of the stories about the Glomar Explorer.

Offline Martlet

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4390
Sunken Voight Corsair F4U-1 fighters stay
« Reply #2 on: November 25, 2003, 02:22:00 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by gofaster

For some intersesting stories about bungled salvage operations by the government, you should read some of the stories about the Glomar Explorer.


I wouldn't categorize a salvage operation in the 70's that resulted in the recovery of ANYTHING from 17,000 feet as "bungled".

Offline muckmaw

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3874
Sunken Voight Corsair F4U-1 fighters stay
« Reply #3 on: November 25, 2003, 02:29:52 PM »
Why  block the salvage, though?

They're not surving any purpose at the bottom of a lake.

Even if this company restores and sells them, many people will get to enjoy these airplanes, and forget it if they end up in a museum.

I don't understand the governments position on this.

Offline bigsky

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 964
Sunken Voight Corsair F4U-1 fighters stay
« Reply #4 on: November 25, 2003, 02:38:38 PM »
they are coffins leave them alone.
"I am moist like bacon"

Offline qts

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 782
      • None yet
Sunken Voight Corsair F4U-1 fighters stay
« Reply #5 on: November 25, 2003, 02:42:54 PM »
I wonder, did they try the obvious step of actually asking the British Govt?

Offline Gunslinger

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10084
Sunken Voight Corsair F4U-1 fighters stay
« Reply #6 on: November 25, 2003, 02:49:41 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by bigsky
they are coffins leave them alone.


Have to totally agree here.  The navy considers sunken ships to be more of a tomb than an archive.  This would also apply to aircraft as well I think.  Its kinda like the whole burial at sea thing....again this just my opinion though.

Offline muckmaw

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3874
Sunken Voight Corsair F4U-1 fighters stay
« Reply #7 on: November 25, 2003, 02:53:27 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Gunslinger
Have to totally agree here.  The navy considers sunken ships to be more of a tomb than an archive.  This would also apply to aircraft as well I think.  Its kinda like the whole burial at sea thing....again this just my opinion though.


Seems to make sense...if it were my grandads plane, though,

I'd rather have it salvaged, restored, and placed in a museum with his name on the cockpit. That would be more of a tribute in my humble opinion.

Offline gofaster

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6622
Sunken Voight Corsair F4U-1 fighters stay
« Reply #8 on: November 25, 2003, 03:19:32 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Martlet
I wouldn't categorize a salvage operation in the 70's that resulted in the recovery of ANYTHING from 17,000 feet as "bungled".


The Discovery Channel actually ran a computer-animated documentary about the recovery of the Soviet submarine and how the failure to secure the load before extraction caused the hull to break apart and lose the materials inside.  :(   They got some of the sub, but not as much as they could have.

Offline Roscoroo

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8424
      • http://www.roscoroo.com/
Sunken Voight Corsair F4U-1 fighters stay
« Reply #9 on: November 25, 2003, 03:47:12 PM »
I think it should be up to the family's of the Pilots ,ect ...
They go to extreame measures to bring family members back from Foriegn countrys for Burial . wouldnt the same apply here?

Id rather see the planes restored and flown or displayed .
Roscoroo ,
"Of course at Uncle Teds restaurant , you have the option to shoot them yourself"  Ted Nugent
(=Ghosts=Scenariroo's  Patch donation

Offline MajorDay

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 328
Sunken Voight Corsair F4U-1 fighters stay
« Reply #10 on: November 25, 2003, 04:34:36 PM »
The best thing I should say that leave F4U-1 alone, because two pilot died on that fighter plane and it the best leave them like coffin what bigsky said.  Also the another good idea that if the F4U crash into the sea and if nobody died on the plane, take it out and restore it.  :aok

Offline Gunslinger

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10084
Sunken Voight Corsair F4U-1 fighters stay
« Reply #11 on: November 25, 2003, 06:43:10 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Roscoroo
I think it should be up to the family's of the Pilots ,ect ...
They go to extreame measures to bring family members back from Foriegn countrys for Burial . wouldnt the same apply here?

Id rather see the planes restored and flown or displayed .


I think your mistaken a bit.  yes now a days recovered bodies get shipped back home but back in that era they were put in the ground were they faught.  There is an attitude of not leaving your dead ON the battlefield and to bring them back for proper burial.

In the navy, Especially back then it was a great honor to be burried at sea and I think thats why the navy keeps its pink slips on its property.

Although if they families gave the OK I dont know why the navy would have a problem with it.  It would probably just result in a squable between the navy the state and the familys though

Offline Martlet

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4390
Sunken Voight Corsair F4U-1 fighters stay
« Reply #12 on: November 25, 2003, 08:32:35 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by gofaster
The Discovery Channel actually ran a computer-animated documentary about the recovery of the Soviet submarine and how the failure to secure the load before extraction caused the hull to break apart and lose the materials inside.  :(   They got some of the sub, but not as much as they could have.



Ahhh, I honestly was only going off the information you linked.   Still, I think getting anything from 17,000 feet 30 years ago is impressive.

Quote
Originally posted by muckmaw
Seems to make sense...if it were my grandads plane, though,

I'd rather have it salvaged, restored, and placed in a museum with his name on the cockpit. That would be more of a tribute in my humble opinion.


agreed.  I'd feel the same if it were me down there.

Offline FUNKED1

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6866
      • http://soldatensender.blogspot.com/
Sunken Voight Corsair F4U-1 fighters stay
« Reply #13 on: November 25, 2003, 10:48:25 PM »
If I were down there, what I would have to say is
"blub blub gurgle glug splash".

Offline Capt. Pork

  • Parolee
  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1216
Sunken Voight Corsair F4U-1 fighters stay
« Reply #14 on: November 25, 2003, 11:38:32 PM »
How can a plane submerged for so long be restored(unless by restored they mean remilling and restamping all the components and simply borrowing the old paint scheme)? Wouldn't the metal fatigue alone pretty much necessitate what amounts to nothing short of rebuilding the plane from scratch? What percentage, in weight, would original parts represent in the restored aircraft?

 Just curious, but it seems that just about every essential system/structural member would never be airworthy again.