Only the most obtuse and dishonest of people could come on these boards and state that Bush never used the threat of Iraqi WMD and linking the 9/11 attack to Iraq to gain permission to invade Iraq. Iraq was constantly portrayed as a hot bead of WMD programs and a focus of the anti terror campaign. It still is by the talking heads of the administration. For brain washed neo con thugs to come on here now and say
"Bush didnt say it and its not his fault if you took that meaning" shows the depths that people will go to in trying to preserve some semblence of rationality in what has proven to be the greatest and most destructive lie of our new century.
All though Bush was always careful to mention that its a hard road ahead we could certainly have expected 6 months after the total control of that country was gained by the US to see....
Evidence of WMD in some form. Some hint of proof that Iraq was not complying....none
Evidence of the 1000s of mass graves that were filled by the bath party. Some kind of collaborative reports from Iraq that it was as horrible as sold.
Evidence of some kind of support for the US from Iraqis. You would think that the US administration could find some story to show progress.
Evidence of some kind of non palistinian international terror link with Iraq. Any link more then a cup of coffee.
Nothing exists to support these central tennents of the invasion of Iraq. Nothing.
No WMD traces at all. The only mass graves were dead from the 91 uprising instigated and then abandoned by the US, terrorist is now a term that is used to apply to resistance insurgence fighters, and the Iraqis are showing no support at all for the US occupation.
The more clear that becomes the more silly and mean and bitter the cheerleaders of that invasion on this board become. Searching their right wing BBSs for new ways to twist the obvios and discredit the truth with ad honim after ad honim.
