Author Topic: What? No WMD in Iraq?  (Read 2378 times)

Offline Boroda

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5755
What? No WMD in Iraq?
« Reply #30 on: January 09, 2004, 09:18:08 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Nakhui
Zavul!! Eb tovayu mat'! Na Khui!

Very good! By the way "Na Hooy" - that's how you pronounce it ;P

However.... consult your slang book for it's "real" meaning.

Russian is just one of many languages that I'm illiterate in.

Nope I've never been banned.

Danke!


What does "Zavul!!" mean? ;)

Another way to pronounce your name is just "nakh". It's an indefinite article, second most popular after "blya". In plain words it's used to connect words in a sentence by some major social groups.

You blya are a funny guy nakh. Keep on nakh posting things like blya what you nakh did, yobanarot.

Ne uchi otca ebatsya :) Ya na yazyke s semi let boltayu. Ne stroy iz sebya specialista po matchasti, esly yazyk ne rodnoy i ty ne iz slavyan - budesh vyglyadet' smeshnym :p

Offline Yeager

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10167
What? No WMD in Iraq?
« Reply #31 on: January 09, 2004, 09:19:09 AM »
No WMDs in Iraq?

Well we had to find out didnt we :D

There is an old saying among wise people: Better safe than sorry.

I always thought part of the reason for putting so much emphasis on the Iraq WMDs was to use the threat posed by their being provided to terrorists as a political weapon to force the pro saddam westerners to the side while the real deal went down.

It worked.

Russian women can be very attractive but their teeth are usually a disaster.  American women moving to Russia?  Egads!  Why would ANYONE want to live in Russia :aok
"If someone flips you the bird and you don't know it, does it still count?" - SLIMpkns

Offline Slash27

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 12793
What? No WMD in Iraq?
« Reply #32 on: January 09, 2004, 09:23:43 AM »
I wonder if there really ever was WMD in Iraq? I know, lets ask the Kurds.

Offline Boroda

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5755
What? No WMD in Iraq?
« Reply #33 on: January 09, 2004, 10:28:20 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Slash27
I wonder if there really ever was WMD in Iraq? I know, lets ask the Kurds.


It's just like accusing NATO of violating an embargo on weapon delivery to Yugoslavia in 1999.

I bet there are WMD in Iraq now.

Offline Pongo

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6701
What? No WMD in Iraq?
« Reply #34 on: January 09, 2004, 10:30:07 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Yeager
No WMDs in Iraq?

Well we had to find out didnt we :D

There is an old saying among wise people: Better safe than sorry.



I believe the saying your looking for is "Its better to beg forgivness then ask permision"

Poor Coling Powel. He is starting to look rediculous. I hope Conrad Black has cut him as good a deal as he cut Peal and Kissinger.

Offline lord dolf vader

  • Parolee
  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1528
What? No WMD in Iraq?
« Reply #35 on: January 09, 2004, 10:45:51 AM »
he was the least "Party faithfull" so he got the easy set that press conference was a huge load of whooey he supposedy complained about it at the time. they turn on each other like dogs was just his turn . think about it they all have to be so full of crap to just be in the position of higher ranking repulican. a water gate senerio of internal betrayal is just a matter of time.

the whole party line is literaly psichotic full of circular arguments and bul**** allusions to god and patriotism. lots of plays on the well inforced dogma of the church. ( how about a partial birth abortion law that is obviously unconstitutional on the face of it and will be struck down, but not till after the election year.... get a grip they are lieing to you)

reagan ran a cocain cartell in south america he only avoided prosecution because of his own vps pardon.

wake up

wmd... more of the same. repubs playin the domatic stupid flagwaivers.

Offline Mini D

  • Parolee
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6897
      • Fat Drunk Bastards
What? No WMD in Iraq?
« Reply #36 on: January 09, 2004, 11:01:45 AM »
I find the whole "haven't found any weapons of mass destruction yet" subject to be very humorous.  It should be easier than this... right?  I mean... it's not like they'd be as easy to find as say... shoulder fired missiles.

MiniD

Offline 10Bears

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1509
What? No WMD in Iraq?
« Reply #37 on: January 09, 2004, 11:28:03 AM »
whoa, you guys give the freepers a run for their money..

Yeager why do you hate America so much?

Offline Yeager

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10167
What? No WMD in Iraq?
« Reply #38 on: January 09, 2004, 12:12:57 PM »
10bears,

I am generally satisfied overall with the current version of America -with some reservations.  

I didnt care for Clintons america thats for sure, although I wouldnt say that I had reached the level of hatred you seem to feel towards america today.
"If someone flips you the bird and you don't know it, does it still count?" - SLIMpkns

Nakhui

  • Guest
What? No WMD in Iraq?
« Reply #39 on: January 09, 2004, 12:49:34 PM »
Some information was recently declassified about the Nixon Administration.

The top-secret document reveals that the United States, under President Richard Nixon, was prepared to act more aggressively than previously had been thought to secure America's oil supply if tensions between Israel and its Arab neighbors continued to escalate after the October 1973 Middle East war or if the oil embargo did not abate.

In fact, the embargo did peter out, by March 1974.

http://www.iht.com/articles/123419.htm
http://www.nytimes.com/2004/01/01/international/middleeast/01CND-DOCU.html?hp
http://www.wsws.org/articles/2004/jan2004/1973-j06_prn.shtml

I suspect, some of you will believe there's WMD in Iraq, regardless of what the current governement investigations find  

Even if Kay comes out and says... ooops we made a mistake.

The present facts are...

The people who said they exist have not yet found them....

Doesn't mean they are lying...
Doesn't mean they are telling the truth either.

That's just what the facts are.

The US government (all governments) are always doing more than what the people really know. Doesn't mean the government is evil.

There are things... the people shouldn't know... for their own good.

U2 and SR-71 flights over Russia were denied by the US Government until Gary Powers was shot down in 1960...

And the CIA was operating in Laos... and Iran... and chile... and El Salvado... selling arms to terrorist to support freedom fighters...

oh the list goes on...

Perhaps there weren't WMD in Iraq....

Bad military intelligence.. perhaps...
and then... is it just possible... that the answer is perhaps the US had to deal with a 'security' problem.... or there are some other reason... not openly known to everyone...

I realize many of you don't want to think this - it doesn't fit into your mental box of what reality is...

You only believe what you've been told.... until it become common knowledge... and conventional wisdom....

What woud have people thought if Churchill announced the day after Germans bombed and killed 10,000 citizens... that Churchil knew about the raid... could have called for an evacuation... but he didn't want the Germans to suspect the Allies had the enigma machine and were intercepting Hitler's communications?

10,000 dead to save a secret.. that ultimately... probably saved 100 of thounsands lives and years of war.

Did any one ever suspect Nixon was planning on seizing oil fileds in 1973?

Well he was.

I'm not talking conspiracy theory... this is how it is.

Is the middle east a better place now?
Are the US national interests in a better place now?
Is America safer?

Offline mietla

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2276
What? No WMD in Iraq?
« Reply #40 on: January 09, 2004, 01:00:13 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Boroda
Funny nickname.

I'll better spell it as "nahooy".
 



Yeah, made me chuckle too :D