Author Topic: Moveon.org and PETA Slammed simultaneously!!!  (Read 613 times)

Offline muckmaw

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3874
Moveon.org and PETA Slammed simultaneously!!!
« on: January 16, 2004, 08:06:30 AM »
CBS rejected both their ads for Superbowl.

BAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAAHA!!!!

Friggin hippies.

Offline Ripsnort

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 27260
Moveon.org and PETA Slammed simultaneously!!!
« Reply #1 on: January 16, 2004, 08:17:58 AM »
Why?

Offline kappa

  • Parolee
  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1330
Moveon.org and PETA Slammed simultaneously!!!
« Reply #2 on: January 16, 2004, 08:22:46 AM »
money, of course...   :rolleyes:
- TWBYDHAS

Offline Ripsnort

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 27260
Moveon.org and PETA Slammed simultaneously!!!
« Reply #3 on: January 16, 2004, 08:25:41 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by kappa
money, of course...   :rolleyes:


They didn't have enough to pay the slot fee for a commercial?  Anyone have a link to the story?

Offline gofaster

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6622
Moveon.org and PETA Slammed simultaneously!!!
« Reply #4 on: January 16, 2004, 08:28:44 AM »
Quote
CBS Cries Foul on PETA, MoveOn Super Bowl Ads  
Thu Jan 15, 8:17 PM ET  

By Peter Henderson

LOS ANGELES (Reuters) - U.S. football fans will not see ads featuring scantily clad vegetarians or a political attack on President Bush during February's Super Bowl after CBS said on Thursday that advocacy advertisements were out of bounds on professional football's biggest day.
   

The network, over the years, has rejected dozens of advertising proposals by advocacy groups, who argue that the network only airs controversial messages that it agrees with.


"We just want to be able to present our jiggly women," said Lisa Lange, spokeswoman for People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, asking to join advertisers like beer brewers who has boosted sales with images of scantily-clad women.


Liberal group Moveon.org, known for its Internet funding power, told members this week that it hoped to have the first political Super Bowl ad.


But its hopes were dashed when CBS said the spot, which asks "Guess who's going to pay off President Bush's $1 trillion deficit?" was an issue piece and could not run.


In a letter, CBS told PETA that it would not run advertisements on "controversial issues of public importance."


CBS spokesman Dana McClintock said the policy had been in place for years. "We have a policy against accepting advocacy advertising," he added. CBS, a unit of Viacom Inc., does run political advertising for and against candidates.


CBS came under criticism in November when it decided not to run a two-part made-for-television movie, "The Reagans," after conservatives complained that it was unflattering to former president Ronald Reagan and his wife, Nancy.


PETA spokeswoman Lange said that CBS's broadcast of anti-smoking advertisements and even hamburger chain spots were controversial, advocacy pieces, as well.


"In essence, CBS is saying we will air an advocacy ad if we agree with the viewpoint," she said.


The PETA ad shows two scantily clad women snuggling up to a meat-eating pizza delivery man. "Meat can cause impotence," the screen reads after the rendezvous fails.


CBS also said the PETA spot raised "significant taste concerns.


I agree with the network on this one.  Football is about entertainment, beer, girls, cars, and investment funds. And video games. And blue jeans. And soft drinks. And junk food. And maybe even tech companies.

I also agree with nixing Bono's duet with J.Lo to support his AIDS cause.  His 9-11 tribute was one thing, but AIDS in Africa smacks too much of a "niche" cause, kinda like the "We Are The World" thingy that was done so long ago.  I don't mind him doing charity work, but do it on his own time, not the NFL's.  

There's always the Daytona 500 in February if they want to air political commercials to a mass audience.

Offline lazs2

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 24886
Moveon.org and PETA Slammed simultaneously!!!
« Reply #5 on: January 16, 2004, 08:36:45 AM »
vegetarian women cause impotence.

lazs

Offline ravells

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1982
Moveon.org and PETA Slammed simultaneously!!!
« Reply #6 on: January 16, 2004, 08:37:41 AM »
Now that Peta have got all this publicity about their ad, people will be very curious to see what it is (particularly as it features scantily clad women). Doubtless it will be posted elsewhere and Peta will get lots of 'eyes' to assuage their curiousity.

So it looks like Peta may win out after all - and far more cheaply than paying for a prime slot.

Ravs

Offline lazs2

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 24886
Moveon.org and PETA Slammed simultaneously!!!
« Reply #7 on: January 16, 2004, 08:47:48 AM »
No matter how much publicity they get.... they will still be.... peta.  pretty hard to work around that one.

lazs

Offline ravells

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1982
Moveon.org and PETA Slammed simultaneously!!!
« Reply #8 on: January 16, 2004, 08:52:49 AM »
True, but I can't help thinking that they had this one worked out in advance all along.

Ravs

Offline lazs2

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 24886
Moveon.org and PETA Slammed simultaneously!!!
« Reply #9 on: January 16, 2004, 09:00:08 AM »
I don't think vegetarians can think that agressively but.... I also think that they are in the same boat as say MAMBLA (or whatever the acronym is).

They are better off with people not quite knowing who they are...  they may get some members who are confused if they don't get publicity.

lazs

Offline kappa

  • Parolee
  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1330
Moveon.org and PETA Slammed simultaneously!!!
« Reply #10 on: January 16, 2004, 11:07:50 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by lazs2
vegetarian women cause impotence.

lazs


Not this one m8.. hehe :eek:
- TWBYDHAS

Offline FUNKED1

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6866
      • http://soldatensender.blogspot.com/
Moveon.org and PETA Slammed simultaneously!!!
« Reply #11 on: January 16, 2004, 11:30:41 AM »
"Bush's trillion dollar deficit"?
ROFLMAO

Offline Dingbat

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1004
      • http://mysite.verizon.net/res0v1l1
I refuse to watch CBS...
« Reply #12 on: January 17, 2004, 05:44:23 AM »
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2004/01/14/eveningnews/main593216.shtml

Quote

They are a soaring real estate trend: fly-in communities called air parks.

"Every house has a paved taxiway to the runway," says Lesley Hock, an Eagle's Nest Air Park realtor.

Amenities include your very own community airstrip, your own personal hanger and the freedom to come and go as you please.

"There's really no security in regards to living with your airplane," says Hock.

And, as CBS News Correspondent Bob Orr reports, that's the fear. These general aviation airstrips, like the one in Eagle's Nest in western Virginia, are an open invitation for terrorists.

"I think it's a real concern," says airport manager John Trissel. "I think it's a possibility."

There are 19,000 general aviation airports in the United States, and most are like Eagle's Nest, with just a single landing strip. There are no fences, no gates, no security systems and no federal requirements to have them.

Since Sept.11, 2001, the government has not ordered Trissel to make any security changes at his airport.

Would-be passengers and luggage are not screened, says Trissel.

"We haven't really implemented the razor wire, the big tall fences, the security gates," says Trissel.

Trissel says he tries to keep a close watch on the planes and strangers, but former National Transportation and Safety Board managing director Peter Goelz says, that's not security.

"Homeland Security has to make general aviation and business aviation a priority," says Goelz. "They've got to develop a program, and they're going to have to spend some money on it."

He says terrorists are well aware of these small insecure airports.

"That's where they learned to fly," says Goelz. "We know the terrorists trained at small aviation systems.

"We know that two of the Sept. 11 terrorists left a plane on the runway at a Florida airport."

Some argue that there's no need to worry because these are small aircraft. But packed with explosives, small planes could be devastating bombs.

"A small plane taking off from a remote airport is going to be virtually untrackable and will suddenly appear into a restricted area - into a high population area, and there's going to be nothing we can do about it," says Goelz.

After Sept. 11, a student pilot in Florida stole a small plane and crashed it into a Tampa skyscraper. Authorities tracked the flight on radar but were powerless to stop it.

But two years later, there've been no mandated security changes.

"We need to make it a real concern and deal with it and try as best we can so that it will never happen," says Trissell.

Until then, vulnerability will be the price for general aviations freedom.





Umm no mention of Airport Watch...  Completely biased reporting...

Offline crowMAW

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1179
Moveon.org and PETA Slammed simultaneously!!!
« Reply #13 on: January 17, 2004, 07:56:34 AM »
If you want to see the ads they can be found at:

PETA

and

Moveon

Offline strk

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 776
Moveon.org and PETA Slammed simultaneously!!!
« Reply #14 on: January 17, 2004, 09:00:21 AM »
Isn't CBS part of the evil liberal media??