Author Topic: WTC #7's collapse  (Read 4536 times)

Offline NUKE

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8599
      • Arizona Greens
WTC #7's collapse
« Reply #150 on: January 30, 2004, 03:47:46 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by kappa
And you'd rather believe there is no conspiracy with no proof.. Now go away......


which proves that you lean towards believing a conspiracy before you believe anything else...... since you have proof of nothing yet believe a conspiracy.

You make a choice to actually say that you had proof that the building was demolished, then you are reduced to asking me to "go away" simply because I ask you to back up your claims.

Please tell us all again why the #7 building felll? I want to hear from an expert like yourself.

Offline kappa

  • Parolee
  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1330
WTC #7's collapse
« Reply #151 on: January 30, 2004, 03:59:56 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Kieran
Right... you've ignored the arguments, then later in the thread posted no one has bothered to refute what you posted. In short, you aren't paying attention to viewpoints that oppose your predetermined concepts. You've said no one has the balls to post refuting arguments based on fact, when in fact people have given you very plausible and reasonable avenues of discussion- which you ignored. You aren't discussing, you're lecturing, big difference.

Now to be honest, it was easy from the moment you started the thread to see where you were going with it. That's why I tried to cut to the chase and get a straight "yes" or "no"- which by the way you have avoided. So... do you believe our government was involved in setting up 9/11, yes or no- or do you not have the balls to say. No wishy-washy "I don't know" either.


I just cant stay away.. Some will drives me here...

Ok Kieran... plz shed more light on these arguments you are referring to that I have ignored??  What view points have i not taking into consideration?? When?? Where?? What are you talking about??
- TWBYDHAS

Offline kappa

  • Parolee
  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1330
WTC #7's collapse
« Reply #152 on: January 30, 2004, 04:03:59 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by NUKE
which proves that you lean towards believing a conspiracy before you believe anything else...... since you have proof of nothing yet believe a conspiracy.

You make a choice to actually say that you had proof that the building was demolished, then you are reduced to asking me to "go away" simply because I ask you to back up your claims.

Please tell us all again why the #7 building felll? I want to hear from an expert like yourself.


I have no physical proof #7 was demolished however I believe it was..  my reasoning.. let me edit this to show you since you are unable to find for yourself.. Yes my child.. I will take your hand... I will show you and lead the way for you since you are unable to yourself.. wait.. I dont have to edit..

My reasoning for this conclusion..

The building's owner said it was...
No steel framed building has ever fallen due to fire..
No other credibal evidence is availible..
FEMA is unable to find a creditalbe reason, hence no reason given..
It is documented that people were aware that #7 was about to fall...
Visual evidence...
Footprint evidence...
Location evidence...
- TWBYDHAS

Nakhui

  • Guest
WTC #7's collapse
« Reply #153 on: January 30, 2004, 04:07:09 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Kieran
Now to be honest, it was easy from the moment you started the thread to see where you were going with it. That's why I tried to cut to the chase and get a straight "yes" or "no"- which by the way you have avoided. So... do you believe our government was involved in setting up 9/11, yes or no- or do you not have the balls to say. No wishy-washy "I don't know" either.


I know for a fact the CIA in collaboration with Mossad and the Scottish Brigadoon underground were involved in the 9/11 hijackings. Contrary to conventional wisdom.

These agents purchased two some times three tickets a piece. They increased their numbers by impersonating additional  terriorst by using hand puppets made of socks, glue stick and felt. Rather clever and resourceful. In this manner each agent was able to impersonate 2 terrorist. There by fooling everyone on board that there were more terriorts than there actually were.

Some agents were even so adept as to impersonate 3 terrorists - a much shorter midget terrorist.

They fooled security by dressing as argile, athletic, and even fishnet sock puppets. Benignly they sat chatting from hand-to- hand blending in among the other passangers. Then when the time came, several of the sock puppets donned their terrorist turbans put a gun to another sock puppet's head (pretending to be an innocent by-stander) and threatened to blow his socks off.

The flight attendant lead them to the captains cabin and thus are the details of the infamous 9/11 hijackings.

Only the CIA, Mossad, and the Scottish Brigadoon underground are sophisicated and specially trained to perform such an act.

That is your proof.

Offline kappa

  • Parolee
  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1330
WTC #7's collapse
« Reply #154 on: January 30, 2004, 04:12:48 PM »
Really Nakhui... please... there lies enough unconstructive bull**** in this thread...
- TWBYDHAS

Offline NUKE

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8599
      • Arizona Greens
WTC #7's collapse
« Reply #155 on: January 30, 2004, 04:14:54 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by kappa
I have no physical proof #7 was demolished however I believe it was..  my reasoning.. let me edit this to show you since you are unable to find for yourself.. Yes my child.. I will take your hand... I will show you and lead the way for you since you are unable to yourself.. wait.. I dont have to edit..

My reasoning for this conclusion..

The building's owner said it was...
No steel framed building has ever fallen due to fire..
No other credibal evidence is availible..
FEMA is unable to find a creditalbe reason, hence no reason given..
It is documented that people were aware that #7 was about to fall...
Visual evidence...
Footprint evidence...
Location evidence...


Just like you have said more than once you were "gone" from this thread, you have believed your own lies.

What evidence do you have or have you seen that concludes
 it was demolished?

I pray that you will answer me, since I know your are "gone" from this thread.

Offline kappa

  • Parolee
  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1330
WTC #7's collapse
« Reply #156 on: January 30, 2004, 04:17:59 PM »
Hey I was gone forabit!

Damn Nuke.. dont make you hold your hand anylonger..  I gave my reasoning.. I also said I have no physical proof.. Damn man.. cant you read?? Everyone of my reasons I got from the links I posted way way back.. Read for yourself..

Besides its funny the watermelon you guys will post when you think you wont be replied too.. lol
- TWBYDHAS

Offline NUKE

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8599
      • Arizona Greens
WTC #7's collapse
« Reply #157 on: January 30, 2004, 04:19:41 PM »
Would it be against this BB rules to state that I beleive I am about 110 times more intelligent than kappa?

Offline NUKE

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8599
      • Arizona Greens
WTC #7's collapse
« Reply #158 on: January 30, 2004, 04:22:16 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by kappa
Hey I was gone forabit!

Damn Nuke.. dont make you hold your hand anylonger..  I gave my reasoning.. I also said I have no physical proof.. Damn man.. cant you read?? Everyone of my reasons I got from the links I posted way way back.. Read for yourself..

Besides its funny the watermelon you guys will post when you think you wont be replied too.. lol



kappa, you posted this garbage and attempted to back it up with your stupid link to an inbred moron's video, who explained how "we all know" bombs were in the WTC 1 and 2.

Now you look even more stupid than the link.

Offline NUKE

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8599
      • Arizona Greens
WTC #7's collapse
« Reply #159 on: January 30, 2004, 04:25:47 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by kappa
Hey I was gone forabit!

Everyone of my reasons I got from the links I posted way way back..



Oh crap, I'm sorry kappa...you got your opinions  and took your stand based on links from the internet........now I know you are correct .

Offline Kieran

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4119
WTC #7's collapse
« Reply #160 on: January 30, 2004, 04:28:09 PM »
Quote
My reasoning for this conclusion..

The building's owner said it was...
No steel framed building has ever fallen due to fire..
No other credibal evidence is availible..
FEMA is unable to find a creditalbe reason, hence no reason given..
It is documented that people were aware that #7 was about to fall...
Visual evidence...
Footprint evidence...
Location evidence...


1. The building's owner said "yes, I had the building demolished."?  Or did the owner say, "The building imploded."?Show me a quote.

2. Since no steel framed building has ever fallen due to fire it's impossible? Horrible logic. How many steel framed buildings have been hit by airliners? Show the research on the effects of airliner strikes on skyscrapers (one of those points you skipped over).

3. FEMA doesn't have a conclusive reason- not the same as having no idea.

4. Documented how? Because of your nebulous "pull" comment? Let me tell you, your credibility went out the window when you chose to hang on that word...

5. What visual evidence? You mean holes someone supposedly saw?

6. Footprint evidence?

7. Location evidence? You mean the part about the building not being directly struck?

Here's a fact for you... you haven't strung these points together logically at all. It is all based on assumption and a shallow examination of circumstantial evidence. In fact, it's laughable you buy into it at all. In the final analysis you aren't saying "I wonder what happened to building #7?"... you are saying "Why was building #7 blown up?".

Offline Kieran

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4119
WTC #7's collapse
« Reply #161 on: January 30, 2004, 04:29:48 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by kappa
Besides its funny the watermelon you guys will post when you think you wont be replied too.. lol


Omigosh, now you're going to go Mr.Black on us.

Offline kappa

  • Parolee
  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1330
WTC #7's collapse
« Reply #162 on: January 30, 2004, 04:32:07 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by NUKE
kappa, you posted this garbage and attempted to back it up with your stupid link to an inbred moron's video, who explained how "we all know" bombs were in the WTC 1 and 2.

Now you look even more stupid than the link.


I first watched the video today.. Although it connected a few more dots for me, it was not what sent me down the road I find myself on...

Who looks more stupid, me with my reasonings or you just arguing with nothing?? Come on man.. Tell me how I'm wrong.. Tell me how FEMA has no answer to why #7 fell.. Tell me how the Federal post building on one side and the Verizon building on the other side were not damaged.. Tell me how and why people (including tom brokov{sp} and dan rathers) both while watching the building fall concluded it was well placed charges and said so on TV... Tell me how and why firefighters, police, news media, and other safety people knew #7 was about to fall and cleared the area.. Tell me how the building fell into a perfect form of itself (i.e. didnt fall over or tumble)... Tell me why the building looks like a demolition..  Tell me why the building caught fire?? Tell me why a steel framed building in an unprecedented act fell due to fire..  Come'on man.. I have reasonings.. you have nothing.... Come up with something or go away... You serve no one.. You really believe there is no conspiracy and I think thats great!! Now help prove that instead of the worthless circle jerk arguments you are placing before me....
- TWBYDHAS

Offline kappa

  • Parolee
  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1330
WTC #7's collapse
« Reply #163 on: January 30, 2004, 04:44:30 PM »
1. Had you spent half as much time reading it instead of being ignorant while arguing with me, you'd not have to ask me these questions.. ..

2.Again.. A slight amount of reading might have stopped this ignorant statement.. #7 was not hit by a plane.. Fires inside #7 building were very small and reported to have been able to be extinquished by the buildings local fire protection...

3.Again, a light amount of reading.. I quoted FEMA saying they have no conclusive reasoning..

4. Again, read.. Read how all radio communications that day were gathered up for 'national security' reasons.. Very few articals are around.. but they are around..

5. Again, abit of reading.. Had you read some of my post you might have actually watched the video of #7 falling.. pretty damning video..

6. Footprint evidence as to how the building fell.. On itself and only covered the area of its original footprint.. Just like an implosion..

7. Again, abit of reading.. #7 was squeezed inbetween 2 buildings that recieved very slight damage..

Perhaps you might get a clue as to why your a waste of my time as you come and argue with nothing more than a desire to argue..
- TWBYDHAS

Offline kappa

  • Parolee
  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1330
WTC #7's collapse
« Reply #164 on: January 30, 2004, 04:48:03 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Kieran
Omigosh, now you're going to go Mr.Black on us.


still waiting on the qustions and facts of statements you were referring to i was dodging??
- TWBYDHAS