WTC #7's collapse

[strk]

Originally posted by Ripsnort
he will if he logs outs and back in as kappa.

Ah, now it makes sense. Kappa banned. Whitehawk talking to kappa, who is whitehawk, who both believe in this Building 7  conspiracy... ah fegetaboutit.

just FYI, Whitehawk is another 52nd, just like Kappa and myself.  

carry on

[Coolridr]

Originally posted by strk
just FYI, Whitehawk is another 52nd, just like Kappa and myself.  

carry on

So you are in with them on this psycho nutjob conspiracy thing?

[strk]

Originally posted by Coolridr
So you are in with them on this psycho nutjob conspiracy thing?

no, we were in the same squad for many years.

[demaw1]

MCGROIN......

 Mcgroin is right, same as a pool , remove the water fast and the whole pool foundation can pop and lose its adhereance to the ground.

  Didnt read much sorry if some one said this already.

[Lazerus]

Hell, I didn't read the entire thread but.....

Originally posted by Frogm4n
Contrails off jets are really chemicals the UN is using to control our minds. Flu shots are really used to make you want to buy more during the holiday season. the space shuttle contains a super-weopon used to create earthquakes from outerspace. And the world trade center was really blown up by our own government.

....and Bush convinced America to invade Iraq only to increase Haliburtan's profits and to make Cheney more money, sacrificing over a thousand lives for monetary gain.


It all makes sense to me now.

[TheDudeDVant]

Eskimo,

Would you be so kind to point out any particular instance of a modern (within the last century) steel frame highrise collapsing due to fire?

[SirLoin]

Oh my..What triggered the Kappa ban?

[Sandman]

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/wtc/collapse.html

[Sandman]

Hmmm... All rantings aside, it appears that the reason WTC7 collapsed is unknown.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/7_World_Trade_Center

If the building was "pulled" by FDNY, what difference does it make?

WTC7 is gone... build a new one and move on.

[TheDudeDVant]

Originally posted by Sandman
Hmmm... All rantings aside, it appears that the reason WTC7 collapsed is unknown.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/7_World_Trade_Center

If the building was "pulled" by FDNY, what difference does it make?

WTC7 is gone... build a new one and move on.

Wow Sandman. Perhaps you say that because your certain there is no cover up of any type here? If so, I do not wrong you for that feeling. It is yours too have.

But we do know that WTC7 was sandwiched inbetween the Verizon building and a Federal building (post office I think) that both received none or very light cosmetic damage. We know that two planes destroyed 7 buildings all of which were part of the WTC complex and a small church I believe. No private buildings were lost or recieved anything more extinsive than lite cosmetic damage. None even shut down or condemned. Take a look at the footprint of WTC7 and the proximity it was to the buildings along it's sides. Take a look at how WTC7 fell.. All these points raised many questions with me.  This is only a small portion of the questions surrounding WTC7 as it is from memory.

[Ohio330]

Hum, all this chatter about building #7 and I don't see anyone
raising the question about WHY, if it was detonated, would
it have been a target in the first place?  What did that building have in it that would have been important to take it down vs.
leaving two buildings practically intact next to it raises an eyebrow
with me.
    Secondly, I don't know why Kappa was demanding proof
that it wasn't a conspiracy when FEMA themselves couldn't
explain why it went down.  If FEMA can't explain why it went
down, that means they also, apparently, don't have
evidence it was TAKEN down either.

[Sandman]

Hmmm... I'm not a firefighter, but it seems to me that the principle goal of the fire department is to contain fires, not save buildings. If WTC7 was burning beyond what they thought they could control and the FDNY considered it a threat to surrounding structures, it makes sense that they would simply take it down.

[SirLoin]

Circumventing language filter

[Sandman]

Originally posted by TheDudeDVant
Wow Sandman. Perhaps you say that because your certain there is no cover up of any type here? If so, I do not wrong you for that feeling. It is yours too have.

I just doubt that the government could manage a cover up of this scale.

[TheDudeDVant]

Originally posted by Ohio330
Hum, all this chatter about building #7 and I don't see anyone
raising the question about WHY, if it was detonated, would
it have been a target in the first place?  What did that building have in it that would have been important to take it down vs.
leaving two buildings practically intact next to it raises an eyebrow
with me.
    Secondly, I don't know why Kappa was demanding proof
that it wasn't a conspiracy when FEMA themselves couldn't
explain why it went down.  If FEMA can't explain why it went
down, that means they also, apparently, don't have
evidence it was TAKEN down either.

Sorry, I dont mean to demand anything. If it was some sort of demand , I would think there would be some pic of a gun in the thread. A question was raised and then the questioner was attacked for being a nutjob/american hater..

FEMA cant explain what happened to #7. They could not explain it when it happened. Funny storry though. What do you think happened to all that 'evidence' that once lay in the form of a ruined building?? Well, they didnt keep it around to study it or investigate where the failure occured. It, along with the ruin from the Towers was shipped to China.. Literally.