Blah, blah, maslo, blah, orel, blah, blah...
I never said I read it. Watching Kappa cast aspersions under the veil of "being enlightened" was all I had to see.
See, there was this wonderful video of two jetliners crashing into these two really tall buildings. There were phone recordings of actual people calling their loved ones in their last seconds on earth. There were cockpit recordings illustrating the struggle for control. All faked of course.
Kappa has proposed in this thread two main ideas that I can see so far:
1. The towers couldn't have been taken down by the jetliners.
2. Building #7 must have been bombed.
Now you have to ask yourself... who do you think could have done such a thing? Could al Quaida have done it all? Maybe, but... why the distraction and high risk of the airliners? Why not set the bombs and blow them, ie WTC bombing #1? Or does the complexity of rigging for simultaneous explosions necessary for such a neat implosion seem improbable given the exposure to discovery by teams of men necessary to make such a thing impossible?
Well then... who? Our own government? For oil? That's stupid beyond belief. We have no shortage of outlets for oil, and the companies make pretty good money at it, too. Much smarter and safer to use your influence to price fix or create a false shortage to boost profit. Killing 2,400 of your own people to boost profits in such an ostentatious way is not only reckless, it's downright stupid.
Look; the president of the US couldn't even keep a blowjob in his office secret. How could such a complex and convoluted scheme as suggested by Kappa go undetected? It just isn't plausible.
