Mickey1992: I like how you use "the majority of the population" as an arguement in your original post, but when I dispute it, you throw it out as irrelevant...
Can't you read, man!?
I said the "the states - against the wishes of the majority of their population". Of "their" - the states'!
The USA is a union of the States and not ruled by popular majority.
The majority of US popluation may have no legal right to make a decision concerning the Union or a particular State.
But a majority of a state population may have a legal right - depending on that state's Constitution.
I am not throwing words here but talking about real things. Just because I do not recognise the jurisdiction of some majority it does not mean I do not recongise any majority.
And to further this theme, you argue that "mostly black children are slaughtered", but when you realize that this is not true, you dismiss it and state that it "hardly affects my point".
My point is that once the federal government can decide who has rights inside the state, it may also deny the rights to the people inside the state, including the right to live.
"Children are slaughtered" is the main point and "mostly black" is a minor qualifier. I could have omitted it altogether or said "disporoportionately black" and that would not have changed a damn thing. I only mentioned it because the whole thing supposedely started to benefit blacks - which it didn't, actually.
The federal government decided that 4 million residents of the states posess more rights than the states were willing to grant them. Now the federal government has denied the right to live to millions of humans every decade that the states were willing to grant them.
What's so special about blacks in this respect except they lost more lives than ever were liberated?
but when your arguements are proven to be incorrect...
First, not an argument but a minor sidenote irrelevant to the main flow. But with your inability to grasp complex concepts and separate an insignbificant part from the whole that is understandable confusion.
And how did you prove me incorrect if you did not post any statistics about the black/white abortions? Even the false governmental statistics. I conceded that I might be wrong with the number because I do not care to look it up since it is not the point of my argument, but that does not constitute a proof of your part.
I would even not emphacise the fact that the rate of abortions is disproportionately higher among blacks than among whites.
You want your 50 million of specifically black children dead? OK, So you will have to wait 20 more years for that. Happy?
Therefore I question the validity of your entire arguement.
If you cannot understand what I am talking about in the first place, you can question whatever you damn wish. I am talking about states' rights here and your attention frame is apparently uncapable of holding more than one word in your memory - as illustrated by your confusion about "majority".
I am sorry but in order to discuss things with me, you better be able to hold the whole sentense in your mind (the whole paragraph would be even better). You may wish to upgrade your reading comprehension to at least 3rd grade level or wherever they teach to put words together.
Unless 1992 is the year of your birth, Mickey. If it is, I apploogise. You are typing quite well for a product of the modern school system. Keep it up.
miko
