« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5]   Go Down

Author Topic: Hey, conservative dudes!  (Read 2126 times)

Offline miko2d

  • Parolee
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3177
Re: Re: Re: Re: Hey, conservative dudes!
« Reply #60 on: February 08, 2004, 01:46:23 PM »
Bodhi: Miko, what flipping dictionary are you getting your meanings from?  Maybe you should be the one to look that word up, specific meaning my arse...  FYI sir-know-it-all Miko, there are 9 seperate definitions to the word liberal with 4 subsets.

 OK, you tell me in what meaning you have used the term liberal when you called me that.
 Was that Not limited to or by established, traditional, orthodox, or authoritarian attitudes, views, or dogmas; free from bigotry?
 Or open to new ideas for progress, and tolerant of the ideas and behavior of others; broad-minded?
 Or maybe Tending to give freely; generous?
 Or (archaic) appropriate for a person of free birth; befitting a lady or gentleman?

 Somehow your statement did not sound like a complement, so I believed it was used with the meaning Of, designating, or characteristic of a political party founded on or associated with principles of social and political liberalism....

 Was I wrong?

Seems to me, that you, with your all superior attitude..

 In all my "superior attiture" I take care to explain myself and address any questions. You, on the other hand, in your arrogant and suprerior attitude, throw around unsubstantiated opinions as it it's a revealed truth of God.
 If I think the show has liberal undertones inserted in it, I presented some justification.
 Charon presented some well-founded points to justify the contrary opinion. You, so far, is just a windbag talking nonsense.

...have gone and decided how yet something else should be viewed.

 All I have "gone and decided" is what I should type on this forum about what I've seen in that show. I am not a US Supreme Court justice or a President and cannot possibly decide how anyone should do anything. I could not even decide that you should read this thread - your own obsession brought you here. You are an idiot if you do not perceive a distinction.
 As for your hyppocricy - compaining of forcing my views on you and then telling me what to do and where to go, I doubt you even know that word, so I would not bother.


Arlo: Ah ... so Andy is a Commie, Barney is gay, Aunt Bea is a bigot and Uncle Charlie is a lesbian.

 What do you think a corrupting show would look like in 1960s? Have all good guys sing "International"? :)

 Today we have the shows wery similar to what you described - and it did not happen all of a sudden. Somewhere there had to be a first step from american values to Sodom and Gomorrah.


  miko
Logged

Offline Arlo

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 24760
Hey, conservative dudes!
« Reply #61 on: February 08, 2004, 02:03:14 PM »
Is "International" metal?
Logged

Offline miko2d

  • Parolee
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3177
Hey, conservative dudes!
« Reply #62 on: February 08, 2004, 02:34:40 PM »
Logged

Offline Arlo

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 24760
Hey, conservative dudes!
« Reply #63 on: February 08, 2004, 02:44:34 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by miko2d
^
http://img.km.ru/sovmusic/mp3/intern.mp3 :)

 miko


Do I really hafta? Is it at least accompanied by cut sceens from the Andy Griffith Show? :)
Logged

Offline wrag

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3499
Hey, conservative dudes!
« Reply #64 on: February 08, 2004, 03:38:48 PM »
Hmmmm........

Movies, television hmmmm...

Thoughts on "Dirty Dancing"

At least 2 felonies were commited and the girl was basically rewarded for lies she told.............
 
Felony 1 an over 18 male having sex with underage female.

Felony 2 an abortion (was illegal at the time the movie took place and a felony)

and mothers who love the film, and watch it with their daughters, seem totally amazed by their daughters later behaviour?


What's the message here?

Hmmmm....

"Jungle to Jungle"

At the very end of the version I saw the father is proud of his son because his son is now a man, seems his son slept with a village/tribal female.  AND of course that's about the time when the parents of the girl show up with the girl in tow and tell the father of the boy how they brought the girl to be with the boy?

How old were these kids?  12, 13, 14?

What's the message here?

"Everyone Loves Raymond"

Ugh come on... kinda tired of comedies that use the dufus male image with an intellegent good wife.

Bash the male, bash the nuclear family, bash people defending themselves bash bash bash ugh tired of watchin this drivel.

NO I Don't have cable.... was at a friends home and they were watchin MTV awards and the 2 girl group sing how males can't have/ain't gettin any of this and at the end a large number of females dancers decked out in what looked like catholic school girl outfits tear off most of their cloths and swap spite with each other big time.... they then cut to popular young male actors who tell everyone just how HOT that was...............

What's the message here???????


I think I find myself tending to agree with Miko on this stuff.
Logged
It's been said we have three brains, one cobbled on top of the next. The stem is first, the reptilian brain; then the mammalian cerebellum; finally the over developed cerebral cortex.  They don't work together in awfully good harmony - hence ax murders, mobs, and socialism.

Offline Shuckins

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3412
Hey, conservative dudes!
« Reply #65 on: February 08, 2004, 04:00:21 PM »
In the spirit of bipartisan camaraderie all liberals and conservative bulletin boarders with common sense and a modicum of brains are herby invited to laugh at Miko!

On the count of three...

One...

Two...

Three...

Bwahahahahahahahahahaha!

You should all feel better now!

Regards, Shuckins
Logged

Offline lazs2

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 24886
Hey, conservative dudes!
« Reply #66 on: February 09, 2004, 08:43:39 AM »
women are plenty bright... they just shouldn't be allowed to vote is all..

lazs
Logged

Offline miko2d

  • Parolee
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3177
Hey, conservative dudes!
« Reply #67 on: February 09, 2004, 10:34:10 AM »
lazs2: women are plenty bright... they just shouldn't be allowed to vote is all..

 "Plenty bright" covers a lot of ground and is applicable to many creatures from nobel laureats to turtles.
 Compared to men, women are not bright. There are certainly some bright women but there are much fewer of them than there are men who are as bright.

 The average intelligence of women is about the same as men but the distribution for men and women around the average is different - women's is narrower than men's. Which means the further you go away from average, the fewer smart (of dumb) women you encounter relative to men.

 So while average intelligence of men and women is about 100 IQ points, there are much fewer women than men above 120 and even fewer above 130. And much fewer women below 80 of course.
 That is why the average SAT scores of women are about the same as scores of men but as you go high enough, you get 6-8 men per every woman beating certain treshhold score.

 miko
Logged

Offline kappa

  • Parolee
  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1330
Hey, conservative dudes!
« Reply #68 on: February 09, 2004, 10:40:13 AM »
Could those test inherit some sort of bias as probably most of them are written by men? If women reason differently than men, couldnt it be said they will test differently?
Logged
- TWBYDHAS

Offline Sandman

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 17620
Hey, conservative dudes!
« Reply #69 on: February 09, 2004, 11:08:23 AM »
Right, wrong... whatever... the perspective is as fascinating as the reactions to it.

Thanx Miko. :)
Logged
sand

Offline miko2d

  • Parolee
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3177
Hey, conservative dudes!
« Reply #70 on: February 09, 2004, 11:24:59 AM »
kappa: Could those test inherit some sort of bias as probably most of them are written by men? If women reason differently than men, couldnt it be said they will test differently?

 A test showing different score for women than men would only be biased if women though the same as men despite disparity in results. More generally, a test biased against women would underpredict women's real-life performance.

 The intelligence tests are scientifically created and calibrated to test for abilities that are fundamental for success in many areas of human endeavor (business, science, technolgy) - math, logic, association and classification, spacio-visual manipulations, etc.

 There is no question that women think "differently" than men in many areas and in those those areas they are inferior.
 In fact there was found a strong corellation between estrogen/testosteron balance and math/spacio-visual abilities in both men and women. There are plenty of other biological differences documented between brains of men and women that could explain the difference in thinking.

 There are no plausible biases that can be offered to explain the difference as an artificial fluke. Women share the same language and culture as men. Women study the same exact subjects. Women in fact have greater motivation and concentration and do better in math and physics and everything else untill subjects get really complex.

 One thing to remember though is that not absolute but relative intelligence that is inherited. A normal woman 2 standard deviations from average would have children with average intelligence also 2 standard deviations from average (setting aside regression to the mean) - same as a man.
 It's just that in men 2 standard deviations correspond to an IQ of 130 while in women it may be only 125.

 So for a man above average marrying a woman as smart as he is means "marrying up" in genetic sense. Especially if she is very feminine (high estrogen/testosteron ratio) - that means her intelligence is more fundamentally genetic rather than a fluke.


Sandman_SBM: Right, wrong... whatever... the perspective is as fascinating as the reactions to it.

 And that's all that matters here. :)

 miko
Logged
Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5]   Go Up
« previous next »