Author Topic: Whom shall the democrats nominate? (Read 1328 times)

Ripsnort · « **Reply #15 on:** February 17, 2004, 08:41:30 AM »

Horn
I don't mind, and I'm sure my children would agree once adults, to paying for alittle security for the future.

Money isn't everything. Safety is.

1K0N · « **Reply #16 on:** February 17, 2004, 08:45:04 AM »

Blame Bush

Horn · « **Reply #17 on:** February 17, 2004, 08:48:41 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by Eagler
. Be confident, our enemies both abroad and internal, are hoping for his defeat. whose camp does that place you in??..!

The thinking camp. The camp that does not just parrot what he is told by his gov't. Of course, that puts you in the other camp, but you and Rip have long ago determined to let others do your thinking for you.

h

Horn · « **Reply #18 on:** February 17, 2004, 08:51:15 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by Ripsnort

Money isn't everything. Safety is.

In that case, we should put you and yours in a isolated jail cell. You will be very safe there.

h

Ripsnort · « **Reply #19 on:** February 17, 2004, 08:52:07 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by Horn
The thinking camp. The camp that does not just parrot what he is told by his gov't. Of course, that puts you in the other camp, but you and Rip have long ago determined to let others do your thinking for you.

h

how so? I vote the issues. Can you explain why I've voted for democrats in the past since you apparently know me better than me?

Today the issue is the security of the world. Who do you think a barbaric muslim extremist cleric is going to be more fearful of...an democrat contender with no history or GW?

Another one moves off subject (comment on the article HORN!) because they can't argue the point.

Dowding · « **Reply #20 on:** February 17, 2004, 08:58:13 AM »

I should think the Muslim Extremist Cleric will be thanking Bush. He probably won't advertise for help with the cause for several years to come.

Ripsnort · « **Reply #21 on:** February 17, 2004, 09:04:14 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by Dowding
I should think the Muslim Extremist Cleric will be thanking Bush. He probably won't advertise for help with the cause for several years to come.

Yeah, we should have hid in the closet and hoped the bad man went away...

Ripsnort · « **Reply #22 on:** February 17, 2004, 09:06:26 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by 1K0N

Blame Bush

Dowding · « **Reply #23 on:** February 17, 2004, 09:10:32 AM »

No. Which is why I, along with most of the world, supported the action in Afghanistan.

Ripsnort · « **Reply #24 on:** February 17, 2004, 09:19:55 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by Dowding
No. Which is why I, along with most of the world, supported the action in Afghanistan.

Heres the kicker...you would have CONDEMNED the U.S. had we gone in and cleaned up Afghanistan in order to PREVENT 9/11.

Now, we're doing in Iraq what we should have done in Afghanistan.

Hindsite is a wonderful vision, isn't it Dowding?

Refer to Rudes post below for further clarification.

http://www.hitechcreations.com/forums/showthread.php?threadid=108864&referrerid=3203

Dowding · « **Reply #25 on:** February 17, 2004, 09:28:45 AM »

If you knew anything about Al Queda, you'd know that an invasion of Afghanistan prior to Sept. 11th would not have stopped the WTC attacks, any more than the invasion has halted the subsequent bombings (Bali etc).

Ripsnort · « **Reply #26 on:** February 17, 2004, 09:31:21 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by Dowding
If you knew anything about Al Queda, you'd know that an invasion of Afghanistan prior to Sept. 11th would not have stopped Sept. 11th.

Ah, nice quick edit Dowding.

Who gave the okay to go ahead with plans Dowding? Why don't you tell me since you're such an expert on the subject. (I''ll have to laugh, er respond to your post this afternoon)

(And for those at home counting, another poster who cannot argue the point of the original topic)

Nakhui · « **Reply #27 on:** February 17, 2004, 09:34:28 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by Ripsnort
Heres the kicker...you would have CONDEMNED the U.S. had we gone in and cleaned up Afghanistan in order to PREVENT 9/11.

Rip,

You yellow press muckraking Anti-liberal-bed-wetter conservative Bush-loving Slate Reading rabble rouser.

Afghanistan had a direct link to 9/11.

Iraq's ONLY link was OIL... OIL... OIL... Bush/Chenny/OIL OIL OIL....BILLIONS of no bid dollars to Haliburton and BAZILLION dollars to OIL companies.

Look at the damn symbol on Bush's "flight" suit.

What is it?

It's the Golly-geen TEXICO logo!
That's no damn Flight suit either... He was never in the Texas ANG - Those are overalls because he pumped gas at Texico through out Vietnam War!

OIL OIL OIL!! It's in his blood!

Ripsnort · « **Reply #28 on:** February 17, 2004, 09:40:25 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by Nakhui
Rip, you yellow press muckraking ramble rouser!

Afghanistan had a direct cause/effect link to 9/11.

Iraq did not... Ira

You totally missed the point, but its not like I'm surprised.

Dowding · « **Reply #29 on:** February 17, 2004, 09:41:16 AM »

I couldn't give a rat's bellybutton about the Democrat nomination. But just to pretend I do, here goes; Dean looks like a moron and sounds like retard, Kerry is a popularity-seeking cameleon who seems to have a very shaky history in terms of issues. That Edwards fella looks like he should be on a cable evangelist show. But at least he seems honest (!). Your party politics is mistifying. Kind of a like a football match but without the fun. British politics is sadly the same these days.

But someone else mentioned Islamic Clerics and Bush - perhaps you should spit the dummy out at them?

Bin Laden - who survived the invasion of Afghanistan did he not? And it's not a nation state, it's a cell based terrorist organisation. Do you think Bin Laden personally orchestrates all the attacks? And when he dies, he'll have some lieutenant take the reigns.