Author Topic: running  (Read 933 times)

Offline hawker238

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1563
running
« Reply #30 on: February 23, 2004, 08:55:35 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by mrblack
The 220 was enough for me I think my best was around 23.80 something


That's pretty damn good too.  Takes me like 26 to get around....


edit: I still can't get over the pole vault thing.  That's f*#king high....

Offline mrblack

  • Parolee
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2191
running
« Reply #31 on: February 23, 2004, 08:59:21 PM »
I tried the pole vault once and busted my arse really hard so coach said I should pass on it LOL.

Offline SunTracker

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1367
running
« Reply #32 on: February 23, 2004, 09:01:10 PM »
Roger MrBlack.  I got a better one than that though.  

I was injured in January of 2001 (itb syndrome).  My friend at work asked me to run a mini-marathon with him in April.  Exactly 4 weeks before the half-marathon, I began training.  At the beginning of the training, I was doing 15 miles per week with a long run of 6 miles.  Three weeks later, I was doing 45 miles per week, with a long run of 14 miles.  My time was 1 hour 30 minutes for the mini.

After work tonight, I will dig out my running books and articles and post some evidence.

Offline mrblack

  • Parolee
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2191
running
« Reply #33 on: February 24, 2004, 12:57:19 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by SunTracker
Roger MrBlack.  I got a better one than that though.  

I was injured in January of 2001 (itb syndrome).  My friend at work asked me to run a mini-marathon with him in April.  Exactly 4 weeks before the half-marathon, I began training.  At the beginning of the training, I was doing 15 miles per week with a long run of 6 miles.  Three weeks later, I was doing 45 miles per week, with a long run of 14 miles.  My time was 1 hour 30 minutes for the mini.

After work tonight, I will dig out my running books and articles and post some evidence.


Oh I got a better Idea.
Why dont you squat over a mirror so you can see what we all are seeing when we invision you.:aok

Offline SunTracker

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1367
running
« Reply #34 on: February 24, 2004, 02:37:52 AM »
Stop mixing booze with your meds.

Offline Kieran

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4119
running
« Reply #35 on: February 24, 2004, 06:16:10 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by SunTracker
Negative, you can only change your aerobic capacity by a few percent.

Its also up to genetics how responsive your body is to training.


Ah, the old "It's genetics" argument. We'll disagree for sure, as this is an old argument amongst runners. While it's true you cannot bring yourself to elite level by conditioning alone, you can become very competitive with all but the very best. That covers more than 90% of the people that you'd ever meet.

Offline Nilsen

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 18108
running
« Reply #36 on: February 24, 2004, 06:42:14 AM »
Unless you have some fysical defect, everyone can be trained to be an elite athlete IF you have what it takes "upstairs"

The genetics thing is bull unless as i said its a defect or injury.