Hello,
iam right, with the tought, that the M-105P and M-105PF(the curve above looks like the PF-1 or 2) are the same engine, one with emergency power (short duration) and one without?? Similar to the DB605A(1310PS) 1942 and the DM605A(1475PS) 1943??
And what you folks think about the M-107A-curve?? Is it similar to Start/Not(5min) or Steig/Kampf(30min)??
I think its Start/Not or the climbvalues of the Yak9U should be much better, but how would the Steig/Kampf-curve would look like?
If ithe assumption that the M-105PF is the M-105 with Start/Not setting, and if i compare and confer the power different between 5min(?) and 30min(?) settings from this engines, the M-107A Steig/Kampf power should maybe look like this:
M-107A 30min (?)
0m ~ 1350PS
1700m ~ 1420PS
2500m ~ 1315PS
4500m ~ 1360PS
But also with this powersettings the climbratio of the late Yak9´s , with 3200kg, seems to be to pretty poor. The best climb to 5km alt i saw, is 4,8 min but more often i saw 5,2 -5,8 min, how is that possible?? Of course not with the powersetting below!!
On the other hand i wonder how a plane that have a so bad climb can have a Vmax of 565-580km/h close to the ground, at least with 1550PS this seems to be pretty much.
Or had the russian planes terrible propellers, only made for highspeed, that would be the only explanation i know for the strange Speed/Climb/Power-relations(the early Spit1a without constant speed propeller had a similar bad climb in relation to its power and Vmax).
Any constructive comments are welcome!
Greetings, Knegel