Author Topic: Looks like she's at it again... (Read 362 times)

texace · « **on:** March 15, 2004, 10:18:19 PM »

Remeber the woman that was charged with the murder of her stillborn son because she refused a C-section?

Local news reported that she recently offered to sell her other son for $5,000 to post bail.

Looks like I was wrong, you guys. Sorry.

moose · « **Reply #1 on:** March 15, 2004, 11:40:32 PM »

how could you be charged with murder for not accepting a c-section?

hell, it could be in your beliefs not to be cut open or whatever. seems kinda shaky to me

Steve · « **Reply #2 on:** March 15, 2004, 11:55:19 PM »

In some Sates there are "Depraved indifference" statutes. Perhaps this applies here.

SOB · « **Reply #3 on:** March 16, 2004, 12:34:22 AM »

You weren't wrong. It should have been her choice to make, which is exactly why the doctor didn't strap her in and force her to do it.

She may very well be a total dip**** though, but I don't know her so I won't comment.

texace · « **Reply #4 on:** March 16, 2004, 01:31:42 AM »

Well, I meant I was wrong about the religious convictions and such about the C-section. Apparently, she had the idea that they were going to cut her from neck to waist and do it that way. She claimed to have had three C-sections before. I still think it's wrong to convict her of murder...but still.

And now the fact that she tried to sell her kid...

SunTracker · « **Reply #5 on:** March 16, 2004, 03:22:45 AM »

This lady is obviously a coke addict, have you seen her picture? Jesus makes people ugly for a reason (so we know they are bad).

Engine · « **Reply #6 on:** March 16, 2004, 03:30:33 AM »

Can't bend the law just to convict *******s.

rookie_spitfire · « **Reply #7 on:** March 16, 2004, 04:51:44 AM »

Didn't the woman have a still born boy and then a daughter which was put up for adoption as soon as she was born????
Or did i read the article wrong???