Author Topic: I'm gonna go out on a limb here and suggest somthing radical (Read 1164 times)

Citabria · « **on:** May 29, 2001, 08:40:00 AM »

after a countries HQ is destroyed sector bars and radar are no longer shown in flight...

but dot radar is still visible from the tower. (assuming its not also destroyed at the individual fields)

this would make the bewildered country less lost and uncoordinated and give us fans of ATC the fleeting oportunity to give and be given vectors to the enemy

NOE raids would be possible during the time HQ was destroyed and ground vehicles would be stealthy since no sector bars are present when HQ destroyed.

just think of it as throwing us NOE/inflightdar/darbar sucks people all a bone without any repercussions because as soon as HQ rebuilds its back to situation normal.

what do you say HiTech?
is it worth a try?

I think it would be quite fun...
even the staunchest defenders of inflight radar would aplaud it because to them radar information from the tower relayed by players is better than no enemy information at all.

thanks.

[This message has been edited by Citabria (edited 05-29-2001).]

popeye · « **Reply #1 on:** May 29, 2001, 11:37:00 AM »

Gets my vote.

Vermillion · « **Reply #2 on:** May 29, 2001, 11:52:00 AM »

Actually I like it as well

------------------
Vermillion
**MOL**, Men of Leisure

DRILL · « **Reply #3 on:** May 29, 2001, 12:03:00 PM »

cit ?? ya been drinking the high octain stuff???... i like it

------------------
DRILL

[This message has been edited by DRILL (edited 05-29-2001).]

SOB · « **Reply #4 on:** May 29, 2001, 12:27:00 PM »

Sounds like a winner to me.

hazed- · « **Reply #5 on:** May 29, 2001, 12:29:00 PM »

like it.Finally those people who can be bothered to fly miles to a HQ will input more to the game than frustration for the country without dar

We could send them off to bomb HQ and all wait for the jabo attack

means coordinateing strikes on different targets? DAMN YES gets my vote too.

P.s. i still think no dar at all below 500ft is my prefered way but if this was implemented id be happy enough and hopefully so will the anti-nondar dweebs

------------------
Hazed
9./JG54

mason22 · « **Reply #6 on:** May 29, 2001, 12:35:00 PM »

wow...like it here.

Swoop · « **Reply #7 on:** May 29, 2001, 12:59:00 PM »

Beefcake for President.

er, I mean, great idea Cit.

Saintaw · « **Reply #8 on:** May 29, 2001, 01:06:00 PM »

Yup, I like it too !

Saw

AKDejaVu · « **Reply #9 on:** May 29, 2001, 01:13:00 PM »

Good idea.

AKDejaVu

Zippatuh · « **Reply #10 on:** May 29, 2001, 01:25:00 PM »

Sounds like a good suggestion.

I also like the no dar below 500 ft.

Zippatuh

Tuomio · « **Reply #11 on:** May 29, 2001, 02:19:00 PM »

Thumbs up from me.

Its good for gameplay and its more realistic than the current one.

Wardog · « **Reply #12 on:** May 29, 2001, 03:03:00 PM »

Should be like that all the time Cit.

Dar should be available from tower or A/C that where so equiped. Would also give HT incentive to model some of the Night Fighters that had it.

Dog out...

DB603 · « **Reply #13 on:** May 29, 2001, 03:06:00 PM »

S!

Similar system is in WarBirds already..Inflight map shows no dots or sector bars whatsoever.Only from tower U can see them.So U need a GCI to guide the defenders to the enemy...

------------------
DB603
3.Lentue
Lentolaivue 34

Ripsnort · « **Reply #14 on:** May 29, 2001, 03:11:00 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by DB603:
S!

Similar system is in WarBirds already..Inflight map shows no dots or sector bars whatsoever.Only from tower U can see them.So U need a GCI to guide the defenders to the enemy...

Yes sir it is, and I've always preferred WB's dar to this dar...but alas, I stay here because I like the abuse.