Author Topic: P-38 Roll Rate  (Read 655 times)

Offline Tequilla

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 56
P-38 Roll Rate
« on: March 18, 2004, 08:11:33 AM »
sorry for posting this already because it is not a bug I believe.
Dale would you be so kind as to revisit the roll rate of the P-38 in AH2.
I fly the 38 exclusively in the MA and the difference is substantial in Ah2.
Thanks in advance

Offline Sabre

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3112
      • Rich Owen
P-38 Roll Rate
« Reply #1 on: March 18, 2004, 10:00:36 AM »
Yep.  First thing I noticed with the P38.  It is markedly inferior to the AH1 version.  My understanding is that the hydraulically operated ailerons really gave it an impressive roll rate, especially at high speed.  Otherwise, the AH2 Lightning is a joy to fly.
Sabre
"The urge to save humanity almost always masks a desire to rule it."

Offline GtoRA2

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8339
P-38 Roll Rate
« Reply #2 on: March 18, 2004, 11:13:56 AM »
Does the AH2 Lighting not have the hydrolic ailerons?

Offline hitech

  • Administrator
  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 12398
      • http://www.hitechcreations.com
P-38 Roll Rate
« Reply #3 on: March 18, 2004, 12:41:00 PM »
Just a simple typo.

HiTech

Offline GtoRA2

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8339
P-38 Roll Rate
« Reply #4 on: March 18, 2004, 04:35:23 PM »
Hitech
 I do not understand? A typo?

Does that mean it was a P-38 J?

Does it mean that there was a minor mistake in the code?

I am confused.

Nothing new really for me though!:D

Offline Batz

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3470
      • http://bellsouthpwp.net/w/o/wotans/4JG53/
P-38 Roll Rate
« Reply #5 on: March 18, 2004, 04:42:35 PM »
The 190a8 and F8 roll rates are a lot different from ah1 and from the ah2 a5 and d9. Is it possible the same typo could be effecting them as well?

Offline Tequilla

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 56
P-38 Roll Rate
« Reply #6 on: March 18, 2004, 08:40:26 PM »
Dale thank you I understand what you typed back as a response now I believe you meant it was a typo in the code thanks for listening:D